Big_Dangerous
Talk Tennis Guru
Didn't the event used to be sponsored by Barclays for a number of years before switching to Nitto in the last few years.Nadal-Tsitsipas 6:7(4), 6:4, 7:5
Didn't the event used to be sponsored by Barclays for a number of years before switching to Nitto in the last few years.Nadal-Tsitsipas 6:7(4), 6:4, 7:5
That was probably the best match on grass he has ever played in his career. His serving/returning combo, movement and controlled agression was insane. Yea that crowd was not on the level of the one in the USO final.Djokovic played so damm well in the Wimbeldon 2015 final though regardless. Nearly every return was at Rogers feet. The crowd was a lot better than USO 2015 one in the same year.
Let’s hope he is “willing to die” next match he is playing
Why? Strategically it makes sense to leave something in the tank for the semi rather than waste it all on a match that has no impact on him.
Tanktankpas
He played a great match in the 2014 final vs Roger as well only to top it in the 2015 one.That was probably the best match on grass he has ever played in his career. His serving/returning combo, movement and controlled agression was insane. Yea that crowd was not on the level of the one in the USO final.
This is the biggest problem with the WTF and round-robin format tournaments in general. There needs to be a better incentive structure which dissuades players from tanking a match.Why? Strategically it makes sense to leave something in the tank for the semi rather than waste it all on a match that has no impact on him.
for me its more of an excuse.Why? Strategically it makes sense to leave something in the tank for the semi rather than waste it all on a match that has no impact on him.
Oh yes!Did they loudly cheer Tsits' double faults and stuff like that today though...
i want thiem to winLet’s hope he is “willing to die” next match he is playing![]()
The Tanking Games:Why? Strategically it makes sense to leave something in the tank for the semi rather than waste it all on a match that has no impact on him.
Oh be nice!
Seems to have worked perfectly.for me its more of an excuse.
Why, because he doesn't parrot the same generic, canned stock responses to media questions?I mean, it was a mostly dead rubber to Tsitsipas. Of course he wouldn't put in unneeded extra effort that could hurt his chances in the later rounds.
However, he should listen to wise man Daniil's teachings and learn to shut the f*** up. Guy's a walking PR disaster.