Im(moral) Winner
G.O.A.T.
We gonna see if Djokovic still cares about masters or will Thiem expose him.
Would not be surprised by this.Inbefore thiem plays **** and lose after peaking against Fedr![]()
Inbefore thiem plays **** and lose after peaking against Fedr![]()
Earth's Mightiest Warrior, it's time to step up if you want RG.
Listen TTW mods, I was here first with this thread.
Felt like joining the bandwagon with a "twist".What happened to the glorious avatar of PCB?![]()
Sh*T and loseFast and loose?
Sh*T and lose
We gonna see if Djokovic still cares about masters or will Thiem expose him.
ExactlyDjo deosn't care.....if he doesn't win.
Agreed. I'm picking Dom in three, but if Djoker comes out gangbusters, forget it.Thiem has to beat Novak tomorrow to make a statement ahead of RG.
Basically, it's a win-win for Novak fans.Djo deosn't care.....if he doesn't win.
Would not look good for Thiem if he lost to Djokovic.Agreed. I'm picking Dom in three, but if Djoker comes out gangbusters, forget it.
Would not look good for Thiem if he lost to Djokovic.
It would look bad because if he can't beat even Djokovic on his weakest surface, then he has no claim as a RG contender.Thiem losing to the current dominant World #1, the holder of the last 3 slams and quite possibly one of the greatest players ever. How is that bad?
Everyone starts out as an underdog against Djokovic.
All that being said, Djokovic doesn't really care about smaller tournaments, so Thiem beating Djokovic tomorrow wouldn't say much for Paris.
It would look bad because if he can't beat even Djokovic on his weakest surface, then he has no claim as a RG contender.
At this stage of their careers, Djokovic is a player Thiem MUST beat on clay if he wants to be taken seriously as the second best behind Nadal.
In the past 2 years Thiem has been better than Djoker on clay and it's not even close. Djoker has no right to be called the second best behind Rafa on clay at the moment.I don't disagree. But Thiem is NOT second best behind Nadal. That is Djokovic.
Thiem won't be mentioned in the same breath as Djokovic, even on clay, unless he actually wins RG.
Djokovic has won RG, beaten Nadal at RG and pushed the Spaniard close to the brink a bunch of times. Thiem is just overrated at this point, until he actually wins a slam.
Thiem never took a set off Nadal at RG, which I heared about a hundred times. Djokovic bad spells on clay coincided with him losing everywhere. Now he's won the last 3 Slams. Thiem just almost lost to a 37 year old in his first clay tournie in 3 years.In the past 2 years Thiem has been better than Djoker on clay and it's not even close. Djoker has no right to be called the second best behind Rafa on clay at the moment.
I don't put too much importance on Djoker's win over Nadal at RG That was the worst ever Nadal on clay. Thiem has faced better versions of Nadal at RG these past 2 years. And Djoker has only pushed Rafa once at RG. All their other encounters were no better than the Fedal RG matches.
So I stand by what I said that if Thiem doesn't beat Djoker tomorrow, it will be a bad look on him. Especially after he struggled to put away a near 38 year old Fed today.
Your last sentence pretty much emphasized why Thiem has to beat Djoker tomorrow to make a statement ahead of RG.Thiem never took a set off Nadal at RG, which I heared about a hundred times. Djokovic bad spells on clay coincided with him losing everywhere. Now he's won the last 3 Slams. Thiem just almost lost to a 37 year old in his first clay tournie in 3 years.
This is the truth. I love it how some think the Rome 2017 SF will happen again.Would not look good for Thiem if he lost to Djokovic.
Djokovic in 2. Djokovic will raise his game and won't give Thiem any chance.
LULZ. Frauderistas. Madrid plays very fast and is well suited to Fed's game. I love the struggles to beat Federer and all the other nonsense.Your last sentence pretty much emphasized why Thiem has to beat Djoker tomorrow to make a statement ahead of RG.
Fed is almost 38 and he is not a contender for RG. Thiem has to beat Djoker to send a message, not Fed.LULZ. Frauderistas. Madrid plays very fast and is well suited to Fed's game. I love the struggles to beat Federer and all the other nonsense.Thiem beat a red hot Federer in form from Miami and very game on clay in Madrid as he's no dummy who think's Nadal is going to dominate this year on clay. The Real Madrid final already happened for this year.
![]()
Odds reflect the betting market which is always going to favor Big 3 headliners due to popularity effect.odds almost 50-50
bit surprising to me but I ain't mad. Don't be shocked to see either man win, whether in two or three.
Going up against a player with a guy named "El Vampiro" pulling the levers does sound troubling for the weak of stamina.I wouldn't underestimate Thiem here, especially this Massu'd Thiem.
At the moment, I have Thiem second after Nadal, and Djokovic third on clay.
Going up against a player with a guy named "El Vampiro" pulling the levers does sound troubling for the weak of stamina.![]()
Djoko is no spring chicken on clay eitherFed is almost 38 and he is not a contender for RG. Thiem has to beat Djoker to send a message, not Fed.
Hopefully, Nadal and Thiem come through to Madrid final. The high altitude conditions do result in some good kick like RG, so Madrid would give a peak at whether the El Vampiro'd Thiem has a solution from the ground for Nadal at his heaviest. Given the closeness of their 2017 Final, this betterer Thiem would have to be favored in final as Nadal showing decline once again from his 2017 resurgence to peakish levels.Well so far Thiem has been the man to beat on clay for me, even though I still give the edge to Nadal at RG.