Novak could've potentially gained 1,980 points during the Sunshine swing.
Instead he walks away with an extra 115...
I have a feeling Federer will get his chance to take #1 once again some time between Wimbledon and the next Australian Open. Maybe he doesn’t even need to win a Slam if he takes all other tournaments seriously.Novak need not worry about ranking points really. Nadal will also lose a lot and there is no one else even close or threatening to take the spot.
Tick tock, he’ll be 32 for his next shot of Slamovic to see if these slumps are just for the “minors.”WUT!?
Do we have to wait for a Slam to see an "in-form" Novak?
In both of his final losses he played without much fight despite (big) titles being involved (and the chance of equaling Roger at the YEC) so I'm not surprised the same happening in IW & Miami despite happening in the earlier stages.No you commented on me saying Novak would gain points this year at the sunshine double and that didn't turn out to be true. You are using tournaments like Paris and WTF to make a point that you saw it coming but he gained about 1400 points in those tournaments and didn't lose in the 3rd and 4th rounds. That's what I disagree with in regards to what you are saying. Losing in the final of Paris and WTF is not the same as his results in these last two tournaments.
Fed won't end the year #1, Novak will easily pass him during the clay season. And Rafa's missing too much time as well. Zverev actually would've had a better chance with all the tournaments he enters, except he's been terrible.Fairly confident predicting he won't be world no 1 by the time London comes around. Federer will even overtake him in the Race to London if he wins this tournament and he's been garbage.
Tanking in the Masters events might seem like what he's doing and it might seem like a good strategy, even. But it isn't what he's doing and it's not a good strategy. You can only raise your game to high energy levels if you have it in the locker - throwing away these events would have the opposite effect. He doesn't have to enter them, so why would he do so only to lose? His game has gone, like it seems to have done any other time he's put a run of slams together.
Genius has spoken again.
I still think he is pretty safe for a while. Nadal obviously has a lot to defend on clay, then deep runs at the last two Slams and Canada title, Zverev has to do well during the spring just to be in contention soon. There isn't just pressure on Djokovic to do well in terms of the number one ranking.
YepEventually, such losses will happen to Novak in the slams as well, just like they happened to Fedr starting from 2010 and got even worse starting from 2014.
he had a wild honeymoon back then but nowReminiscent of Canada-Cinci 2014 anyone?
No tanking is pushing it. No top player tanks.
It's just that he played at half his usual intensity. He didn't dig deep, didn't raise his game etc etc.
Who cares about Miami basically, when there is bigger fish to fry for Novak.
In both of his final losses he played without much fight despite (big) titles being involved (and the chance of equaling Roger at the YEC) so I'm not surprised the same happening in IW & Miami despite happening in the earlier stages.
Probably tweeted that while he was flipping his bottles and arguing with yet another umpire.
Fedr needs to use this opportunity to kickstart his career. He seems the most talented among the Next Gen.That could be true. Still, not making quarters at either Sunshine Masters...that’s unexpected for a guy that likes to dominate the tour.
Still, opens the door for some fresh blood to make progress.
He lost today cause I tweeted to novak that he wins too much, and he listened to me. I will also tell him he needs to lose French open and Wimbledon so Rafa and Roger can win one major this year
Or maybe you've used up your influence for the year. (Hopefully)He lost today cause I tweeted to novak that he wins too much, and he listened to me. I will also tell him he needs to lose French open and Wimbledon so Rafa and Roger can win one major this year
He needs gurufilsWUT!?
Do we have to wait for a Slam to see an "in-form" Novak?
He lost today cause I tweeted to novak that he wins too much, and he listened to me. I will also tell him he needs to lose French open and Wimbledon so Rafa and Roger can win one major this year
You just want to see my cry!He needs gurufils
I still think he is pretty safe for a while. Nadal obviously has a lot to defend on clay, then deep runs at the last two Slams and Canada title, Zverev has to do well during the spring just to be in contention soon. There isn't just pressure on Djokovic to do well in terms of the number one ranking.
If you actually read the posts, the consensus is that this tournament is now pretty open and up for grabs.you guys are already giving the mighty fed the title in Miami I think he might get taken out tonight and I hope I'm right
Novak should play his best til US open. RAFA has to win French this year or we are at risk of him retiring with all the injuries going on. and roger has to win Wimbledon so he can put his major record out of reachOr maybe you've used up your influence for the year. (Hopefully)
He needs gurufils
Fairly confident predicting he won't be world no 1 by the time London comes around. Federer will even overtake him in the Race to London if he wins this tournament and he's been garbage.
Tanking in the Masters events might seem like what he's doing and it might seem like a good strategy, even. But it isn't what he's doing and it's not a good strategy. You can only raise your game to high energy levels if you have it in the locker - throwing away these events would have the opposite effect. He doesn't have to enter them, so why would he do so only to lose? His game has gone, like it seems to have done any other time he's put a run of slams together.
And both are injuried nowSvitolina is the real Guru behind the Guru. Monfils has played some pretty inspired tennis at times this season already
I guess nobody knows until the slams come around how much harder Novak will be to beat because so far he's found the extra gear even besides the fact that it's BO5, but honestly, this is how it starts. I know this might sound like wishful thinking or whatever you want to call it, coming from a Federer fan and all, but from my own experience this is how it started for Federer. The more people that beat you in the Masters and the smaller events the less feared you become. The locker room is watching at all times. And they start stepping out on court believing they can beat you.
Medvedev said it at the AO. Now he didn't win, but he basically said yeah he's good, but he's not as good as he used to be, and Medvedev might've won the set he did because he had that attitude.
I'm not marking Djoker's demise here let's be clear. He'll be fine in the long run, but I do wonder where the motivation comes from now as far as slams go. 2018 was the comeback tour that proved he wasn't done, and he wanted so badly to prove that. Then it carried over into the USO, and he won the AO on his best surface. Great wins all, but I wonder if another NCYGS will be enough to motivate him or the slam race is enough to motivate him. Both things I'm not entirely convinced of since Djokovic himself knows how far away 5 slams actually is, and he has won RG before so it's not like he's going for the career slam.
And the main reason I say that I'm not sure the slam race entirely motivates Novak is because of what happened after RG 2016 when everybody including myself thought that the slam race would actually motivate him, but it didn't.
At any rate, I guess we'll see on the clay, but I don't like the look of unmotivated Novak right now, though to be fair, I wouldn't be smashing the panic button.
Just my 2 cents.
I think it's a great post overall. But I really sense that as a Fed fan, you're HOPING That Novak doesn't win more slams. So this post seems to be more of a wishful thinking. (I don't mean this in an unkind fashion).
The problem is that if Novak wins 2 (or more) of the remaining 3 slams this year, he would be very likely to get the slam record before he retires. In fact, many people might start calling him GOAT even earlier.
You're comparing Fed's decline to Novak's. Novak is the champion at 3 consecutive slams and hasn't EVEN lost a set in the final of these 3 slams. That's an insane record.
No one can challenge Novak at the slams. Not Fed. Not Nadal. Not Delpo. They didn't even win a set.
In Fed's time. he would still lose to Nadal or be pushed hard in slams. He was pushed by Nadal as early as 2006/2007. Novak just seems unbeatable. As he gets closer to the business end of the slams he even stops losing sets.
I'm not saying Novak is as good as peak Fed. I'm just saying the field is weak. We have a grandpa Fed. A crippled Nadal. And a useless next gen. That's about it.
So I won't pencil in Novak's decline until we see him losing in slams. Last time I checked that was almost a year ago. At this time, he's the undisputed #1 and favorite at all slams. And IMO a very real threat to Fed's slam record and the putative GOAT title.
Svitolina is the real Guru behind the Guru. Monfils has played some pretty inspired tennis at times this season already
Understand where you're coming from. I get it, but I think the no one can challenge Novak at slams narrative isn't exactly true. Yes, he's won the last 3 and played very well in all of them, but that was kind of the point of my other post. I'm wondering how long that lasts because I'm wondering where the motivation comes from. The way you sound here, meaning no offence of course, is like you think Novak will win the CYGS because no one can challenge him, but it might not be the top players that beat him as we witnessed during his first fall.
The smart money is on Novak not winning the CYGS, and tbh the smart money is probably on 2 slams or less even in this field. Now if he wins 3 slams this year, all power to him, I'm simply saying it's probably not a smart bet right now. My guess (and I could be wrong as I have been many times before) is 1 more slam for Novak this year, either at RG or the USO.
Maybe a better time for my above post is after he actually loses at a slam, whenever that may be. So again, I understand where you're coming from, fair enough.
I agree once again. If I were a betting man, I would bet against Novak winning CYGS. There is a reason it hasn't been done since Laver did it. It's a very hard thing to do obviously.
And yes, he might not even get 2 slams this year, because there have been few years with one player winning 3 slams in a year.
Still, it is my opinion, that we cannot expect his decline until we see it. I think both of us are speculating at this point. You might be 100% right and this might be the descent for Novak. But you might be wrong as well, if Novak ends up winning one (or both) F.O and Wimbledon. Let's just see.
All in all, I just think that early losses in the Sunshine double shouldn't change much w.r,t Novak's chances at the slams - even at the F.O. I think people are under-estimating the psychological impact of the straight set drubbing that Novak gave to Nadal at the AO. Basically that match eliminates Nadal as a rival for Novak in general.
best meme so far
Yeah I guess my post is probably a little too early, and could definitely be interpreted as a knee jerk or jumping the gun so to speak. Just trying to predict the future and probably failing horribly.
I'd sure love that, and I hope you're right! But, he's still over 6000 pts behind.... that's a lot to make up!I have a feeling Federer will get his chance to take #1 once again some time between Wimbledon and the next Australian Open. Maybe he doesn’t even need to win a Slam if he takes all other tournaments seriously.
Or you might be right. And then at the end of the UsOpen if Novak hasn't done much, everyone will be quoting your post as prescient.
Agree on your thinking re: Novak, but Roger will never be world number 1 again, ever. Let’s just get that out of the way right now...
I agree with your prediction that Nadal will be number one at the end of the year. Careful as Fed is in his dietary, exercise & rest regimen to protect his body, his age is slowly catching up with him; Djokovic's recurring homesickness and respiratory problems rise up often enough to be a problem, and he does look bored much of the time. Nadal is still a fierce, dedicated tornado. And who else is even close? Tsitsipas isn't quite ready yet.I don't think Fed will either, I'm making the point that Novak has lost so much ground that a poor Fed will be ahead of him in the yearly standings. Nadal will be number one at the end of the year.
Agree on your thinking re: Novak, but Roger will never be world number 1 again, ever. Let’s just get that out of the way right now...