He does get attacked all the time, the answer isn't though to do the same thing to other players, it's to remain as fair as possible, not only in your analysis but your choice of words. Believe it not but I get into arguments with Fed and Djokovic fans a fair bit time for calling them out on it, though I don't imagine you would ever step in on someone else unfairly attacking Federer or Djokovic
There's sensitive and there's just imagining things.
As regards to my original post, I've looked at Nadal draws and said "he's got a good draw, he should do well" or "he's playing well but not had anyone good yet so we'll see" I don't think I've ever gone out of my way to post several times on how he has "a weak azz draw" unless directly responding to someone saying that about Federer or Djokovic when Nadal's draw was as weak or weaker. There is no need for it unless you dislike a certain player and want to display that dislike. I don't dislike any of these players, they're all incredible and basically good guys despite obvious flaws. Fans can be annoying but that's a different topic. Don't get me wrong, EVERY fan base does it. Every time there is a draw fed fans complain about Nadal's draw, Nadal fans complain about Fed's or Djokovic's ... I've several times posted a topic before a slam asking people to select who is a tough draw before the draw is made, and no one ever responds. You're not worse than a large amount of Fed fans but you're not being any better either, and if you're going to call people on their behaviour towards Nadal then your own behaviour towards other players should match up to that. Do unto players as you would have their fans do unto yours