nounforcederrors
Hall of Fame
A three-setter coming up, Halep-Bouzkova?
Lets hope not... that could go on forever at this rateA three-setter coming up, Halep-Bouzkova?
Well, Bouzkova's looking very sharp, 3-0 already.Lets hope not... that could go on forever at this rate
True she has come out playing quite well. The first two games or so were pretty long and I was anticipating a real grinder... hopefully Bouzkova can keep up her level. Nice to see a youngster that isn't a ball bashing robot.Well, Bouzkova's looking very sharp, 3-0 already.
RIP VaidisovaI just find it fascinating how the Czech Republic turns out so many good womens tennis players.
Unless Bouzkova takes a page from the Halep playbook on how to beat Serena - make her run for dropshots, make her run side to side, make her run, period.Bouzkova takes the first set 6-4 on the Wimbledon champ.
This could be very good for Serena.
Really?! ... Do you have any data to back that up?Defending champ retires hmmm. She does that alot after dropping a set.
It is quite unusual for Simona to retire. So often, she gets taped up and/or PT and soldiers thru her injuries. She did not seem to be getting to some shots that she normally would. And just a little bit off on the strokes, esp her Fh... enuff to rack up the UEs.Halep retired.... I hope it's just out of precaution and nothing serious.
Jabeur last year in Beijing and against Makarova in Washington as well. Just seems very strange, seemed fine.Really?! ... Do you have any data to back that up?
Don't believe that is the reason that Simona retired. That is not her MO. She's played injured in the past after losing the first set. No doubt either too painful or too risky for her to continue. That makes more sense given her past history with injuriesBouzkova just to much for Halep to play, after close 1st set and had to retire or else blow out score!
What the heck happened?? I left to take a call and it was over with RE!? Did Halep look injured?
Jabeur last year in Beijing and against Makarova in Washington as well. Just seems very strange, seemed fine.
After losing a set? 3 times in 2 years?Is that "a lot" to you for a player that plays as many matches as she does and at the level that she does? It's common sense that if you are injured you usually can't play to full capacity and most likely you lose.
After losing a set? 3 times in 2 years?
I just had a look and since the start of 2018, Pliskova hasn't retired once (she plays alot of matches too) Svitolina hasn't either (and she's had quite a few injuries of late), Barty's done it once. So yeah i'd say it's weird. And it was also the fact she looked fine, fought back from 0-4 down and smoked Kuznetsova in the last match. I'm sure we'll see her in Cincy all fine and well..
Not true with regards to Simona. She has played injured quite a few times after dropping a set.Defending champ retires hmmm. She does that alot after dropping a set.
Jabeur last year in Beijing and against Makarova in Washington as well. Just seems very strange, seemed fine.
I just find it fascinating how the Czech Republic turns out so many good womens tennis players.
i hope it will happen. that would be a juicy matchWonder how motivated Andreescu knowing she has a chance to meet Serena in final.
Halep retired.... I hope it's just out of precaution and nothing serious.
Looks like she didn't pull out (yet) from Cincy.Probably jittery about being fresh for the U.S. Open, so she bailed. Not the first time a player retired from an event to preserve themselves when a major is on the horizon.
The way I have it is nobody beats Serena in a GS final and expect to beat her ever again.Nobody beats Serena 3 times in a row![]()
Nope, not weird and not a real pattern. I looked at it further. She's not a quitter. It makes no sense for her to quit after losing a set (esp with only a 1-break differential) in a QF match w/o good reason. Why would she? She had called out the trainer (twice?) in her previous match. The TC match commentator mentioned her Achilles tendon issue several times during the QF match with Marie.After losing a set? 3 times in 2 years?
I just had a look and since the start of 2018, Pliskova hasn't retired once (she plays alot of matches too) Svitolina hasn't either (and she's had quite a few injuries of late), Barty's done it once. So yeah i'd say it's weird. And it was also the fact she looked fine, fought back from 0-4 down and smoked Kuznetsova in the last match. I'm sure we'll see her in Cincy all fine and well..
She sacrificed Connecticut last year but it didn't help. By the end of Cincy last year she had already beat up her body too much (Achilles injury and a herniated disc in her back).Looks like she didn't pull out (yet) from Cincy.
In what was the shortest press conference I've ever seen (less than 1min) she eluded that she realized during the match that she was not fit to battle Serena in the SF even if she would win the match and she decided to retire.
I hope she manages the situation wisely to preserve her chance for another YE#1. If she needs to sacrifice Cincy as well she should.
Probably jittery about being fresh for the U.S. Open, so she bailed. Not the first time a player retired from an event to preserve themselves when a major is on the horizon.
Is that "a lot" to you for a player that plays as many matches as she does and at the level that she does? It's common sense that if you are injured you usually can't play to full capacity and most likely you lose.
The way I have it is nobody beats Serena in a GS final and expect to beat her ever again.
Ask Sharapova if you don't believe me!
Yeah, well, it was all expected.
Osaka's false dawn was always going to end in tears, nobody can possibly challenge Serena and escape completely unscathed.
The psychological damage started rather insidiously in that very first Slam final, where she won but probably felt like she lost in the end.
She managed to carry on her good form and positive attitude into the Australian Open, but the now well established pattern of bad decision-making as a female teenage tennis player, exacerbated by the pressure that was put on her that she would be the "new Serena", ultimately finished her off.
A sigh of relief even before there is any need to be worried for the most extreme Serena fans, who are pretty much a mirror image of the most extreme examples of Federer fandom in the men's game: you see, records (especially the quantitive kind, because this is a consumer society) are now everything in this game, and because they're everything, obsessive fans obsessively identify themselves with them, while the player they support is just an empty vessel that represents "the greatest", which they choose to identify with.
I have engaged with Serena and/or Federer fans who openly admit that they'd immediately take option #1 if the choice was between:
1) Their player never wins another tournament, but with the assurance that their rivals will never surpass their records.
2) Their player continues to win tournaments, but one or a few of their rivals (in the present or the near future) will eventually surpass their records.
It is very difficult to continue loving this sport when the trend is to magnify personality cults rather than promoting a genuine love for the game itself.
Yeah, well, it was all expected.
Osaka's false dawn was always going to end in tears, nobody can possibly challenge Serena and escape completely unscathed.
The psychological damage started rather insidiously in that very first Slam final, where she won but probably felt like she lost in the end.
She managed to carry on her good form and positive attitude into the Australian Open, but the now well established pattern of bad decision-making as a female teenage tennis player, exacerbated by the pressure that was put on her that she would be the "new Serena", ultimately finished her off.
A sigh of relief even before there is any need to be worried for the most extreme Serena fans, who are pretty much a mirror image of the most extreme examples of Federer fandom in the men's game: you see, records (especially the quantitive kind, because this is a consumer society) are now everything in this game, and because they're everything, obsessive fans obsessively identify themselves with them, while the player they support is just an empty vessel that represents "the greatest", which they choose to identify with.
I have engaged with Serena and/or Federer fans who openly admit that they'd immediately take option #1 if the choice was between:
1) Their player never wins another tournament, but with the assurance that their rivals will never surpass their records.
2) Their player continues to win tournaments, but one or a few of their rivals (in the present or the near future) will eventually surpass their records.
It is very difficult to continue loving this sport when the trend is to magnify personality cults rather than promoting a genuine love for the game itself.
Ostapenko is a strange case. Her very 1st WTA title (2017) was a slam event. But she has only added 1 minor title for a grand total of 2. Osaka has fared better but is still rather odd. A total of 3 titles -- all but 1 of them is a slam title. Will Jelena and Naomi be the WTA versions of Stan Wawrinka?I too see the sudden success of the young female players, especially if they come from a developed country and they are reasonably good looking, as being a burden rather than help for their long term professional tennis career. There are few examples in the recent history that illustrate that. They instantly turn into a marketing vehicle first and tennis players second. I think a steady and progressive raise to the the top, winning multiple smaller tournaments first over a period of time, running deep in multiple bigger tournaments, holding or improving the position year over year for few years, sets up the player for a longer, more successful career most likely.
The meteoric raise after winning one big tournament/GS, becoming a "star" overnight, getting all of a sudden a lot of attention from media and sponsors is often followed by just as sudden drop the next year and from there, much harder to climb back up because now they have the pressure from the same media and sponsors to deal with. When personality, character, education, entourage are thrown in the mix, things get even more complicated.....
It's hard to say where Osaka will be in 5 years from now but looking back at Ostapenko, Bouchard, and even Muguruza to a certain extent, the prospect is not very good. Bouchard didn't even win anything big and she became "a tennis star" just because she reached one GS final and 2 SF within a 6 month window when she was 19-20 yo. All of the sudden everyone jumped into the "next big thing" wagon.... Look where she is now tennis wise.... Same with Ostapenko..... she is back if not lower than where she started before RG17.
Osaka might be an exception as she seems to have a good personality at least, which is helpful, but perhaps by the end of the next season will have more hints where her tennis is going. She was lucky indeed that she carried the momentum to win a second GS within that window which makes a difference but still.... only time will tell how she will evolve from here.
And screamingBoth kenin & andreescu abusing the net![]()