AnOctorokForDinner
Talk Tennis Guru
What is Sasaschka pizzd aboot?
Two stupid points from Zverev!![]()
We expect nothing else (from you)Medvedev tanked the first game with some stupid errors and Zverev never let him come back. Expect a 6-0 in the second set.
Which is another proof that this tournament is a joke. Djokovic didn't deserve a Rome final by any means this year (pathetic choke from Del Potro, very close match against Schwartzman where he looked vulnerable) and yet he was fighting for the title until the last point. On the other hand here you actually get punished for winning close matches? ROFL.Fed’s 4-2 in sets, Thiem’s 4-3, Nadal’s 4-4. He wouldn’t advance even if he were in the other group if he had that same record. Sounds fair to me.
And actually he could still advance top of his group if Zverev loses despite having a worse record than either player in the other group (not to mention Tsitsipas), so this format has actually been quite forgiving for Nadal.
If he won USO, we'd be wondering if he is a one Slam wonder/fluke. Now we are wondering if he is just an ordinary fluke.It’s amazing how the narratives change (sometimes rightfully sometimes not) based on winning and losing close matches. If Med had won USO this would all be immaterial but now we are forced to wonder if he’s a fluke .
Lmao touché . Federer the mental midget with 20 slams after all. Apt pointIf he won USO, we'd be wondering if he is a one Slam wonder/fluke. Now we are wondering if he is just an ordinary fluke.
If Djokovic didn't deserve to reach the Rome final after saving match point, why does Nadal deserve to reach the semis here given that he's also played a match where he had to save match point?Which is another proof that this tournament is a joke. Djokovic didn't deserve a Rome final by any means this year (pathetic choke from Del Potro, very close match against Schwartzman where he looked vulnerable) and yet he was fighting for the title until the last point. On the other hand here you actually get punished for winning close matches? ROFL.
That's what I tell cops whenever I get pulled over. It's yet to workBrad Gilbert's sitting at courtside and says the speed gun is juiced. "Nobody can hit a 132 MPH serve out wide as Zverev did. The speed gun is way off."
It's so sad that a champion like Nadal has a fan like you.As I said, Nadal should have tanked today. Why did he play for 3 hours, wasted so much energy? For nothing. Just for NOTHING. He should have tanked the second set 6-1 after losing that tie break.
I say they were in the same situation. But Djokovic had the chance to keep fighting, Nadal can't do it now.If Djokovic didn't deserve to reach the Rome final after saving match point, why does Nadal deserve to reach the semis here given that he's also played a match where he had to save match point?
No. Loss against Tsitsimug would SUCK.As I said, Nadal should have tanked today. Why did he play for 3 hours, wasted so much energy? For nothing. Just for NOTHING. He should have tanked the second set 6-1 after losing that tie break.
I find it pretty fair that the more dominant guy gets rewarded compared to the one who struggled.Which is another proof that this tournament is a joke. Djokovic didn't deserve a Rome final by any means this year (pathetic choke from Del Potro, very close match against Schwartzman where he looked vulnerable) and yet he was fighting for the title until the last point. On the other hand here you actually get punished for winning close matches? ROFL.
Because he lost a match.I say they were in the same situation. But Djokovic had the chance to keep fighting, Nadal can't do it now.
And I explained why.I say they were in the same situation. But Djokovic had the chance to keep fighting, Nadal can't do it now.
Then he should've performed better in his opening match. Whichever way you look at it he only has himself to blame.I say they were in the same situation. But Djokovic had the chance to keep fighting, Nadal can't do it now.
That's what I tell cops whenever I get pulled over. It's yet to work![]()
Tsitsipas and Zverev lost too. They get the advantage because they won their matches easier. In other tournaments you will not see that.Because he lost a match.
Idk how the 'play every point like it's your last' and 'never say die' Rafa has a fan ready to throw in the towel before the warm-ups have even ended lolIt's so sad that a champion like Nadal has a fan like you.
How is that not fair? If you are more dominant, it means you are better. I don't see what's the problem here.Tsitsipas and Zverev lost too. They get the advantage because they won their matches easier. In other tournaments you will not see that.
You compared this to Djokovic in Rome though. He won all matches before the final there.Tsitsipas and Zverev lost too. They get the advantage because they won their matches easier. In other tournaments you will not see that.
In slams you can have a walkover in every match. Should they be taken out of the calendar too?Tsitsipas and Zverev lost too. They get the advantage because they won their matches easier. In other tournaments you will not see that.
Who is it acceptable for Nadal to lose to here in your opinion?No. Loss against Tsitsimug would SUCK.
If a bag of gold fell on Strongrules head and made him rich, he’d tell you how much his head hurt instead of being happy about his new riches.
LMAO!If a bag of gold fell on Strongrules head and made him rich, he’d tell you how much his head hurt instead of being happy about his new riches.
Lmfao I am dying . Perfect supplement to the original content . Well played
A loss to Zverev was ok, Sascha is a nice guy and Nadal didn’t really have a feud with him at any point. Tsitsipas and Medvedev on the other hand are two of Nadal’s main rivals this season and he better keep their confidence low going into 2020.Who is it acceptable for Nadal to lose to here in your opinion?
Hi, Queen of Bridesmaids,@Sudacafan
I noticed you liked this post. Are you a Zed hater too? What else is new around here?
Also, misuse of the 'like' feature. Tsk, tsk.
Not really he was pretty dreadful in all matches besides Djokovic .Funniest thing is that Federer fans would be totally MAD if Federer didn't get out of his group with 2 wins.