2020 Australian open final :- [5] Dominic Thiem v/s [2] Novak Djokovic

Match Result prediction poll


  • Total voters
    212
  • Poll closed .

AceSalvo

Legend
He went 5 sets with #3 on the GOAT list after beating Nadal in the Quarters. That’s a solid tournament. Only really choked at the end of the fourth, which was the set Djoker stopped hitting UE after UE after UE (choking in his own right for 2 sets). 5th set was Novak playing like Novak should. Good final and great tournament for Thiem

Thiem was choking and nervous in the first set of his 4th GS final. Such a shame he could not hold his own serve.

Losing WTF final and this final shows he is lacking self belief to win the big titles.

Lets not start sugar coating Thiem's losses.
 

zvelf

Hall of Fame
Eff off Djokovic. I don't think I have ever hated a player more than this guy and I know it's completely irrational. Time after time he is the source of bitter disappointment. Beating Federer continually and now scuppering my bet. Had quite a lot of money on Thiem to win at the start as I really fancied him for the win. Was looking good at 2-1 up but of course that annoying fekker slams the door on it.

I could see putting a little money on Thiem but putting a lot of money on the line against the most successful Australian Open champion ever? Not smart.
 

DSH

Talk Tennis Guru
Thiem was choking and nervous in the first set of his 4th GS final. Such a shame he could not hold his own serve.

Losing WTF final and this final shows he is lacking self belief to win the big titles.

Lets.nit start sugar coating Thiem loss.


It is his 3rd. GS Final.
8-B
 
Last edited:

jss

New User
Noticing a pattern to Djokovic championship matches. He starts off good, inexplicably implodes and starts losing games, then a few sets later he flips a switch and its back to buddha mode, cant lose wont lose. The end of the match is always him in complete control. Is it tactics? Is it tennis IQ where hes just the best at figuring out opponents? Or is he just sandbagging to make it more interesting?

Personally I prefer that if hes gonna win with such domination, he should just play the entire match like that. That way I can go to sleep sooner.
Or, is he doing that to throw off his opponent?
In my opinioin, you should win by playing better tennis.
 

Doctor/Lawyer Red Devil

Talk Tennis Guru
The match is on Tim's racquet and his game bears more than a passing resemblance to Stan's. So the Molefam might just have those smirks wiped off their faces come Sunday...

Tim might be young, dumb and fulla rum and it'll probably get messy, but eventually he'll wind up the old DTL-OHBH-and-IO-FH-****-machine-gun and slaminal his way up and over the Nolan Heights.
You'll be fake kissing Timmy's tushie eventually like you did with your "longtime favorite" slaminal. But not today... Today it's Smirkovic time. :)
 

mightyjeditribble

Hall of Fame
Well done to Novak for toughing out another victory. Thiem got quite close, however. The last two GS finals have been won by the big 3 in 5-set victories.

Change is coming. The only question is when will the younger generation break through and win a title? I still think it should be this year.

(Sent from my mobile phone, apologies for typos!)
 

Sephiroth

Hall of Fame
This is why talent doesn't mean jack **** it's the thing between the ears that counts the most in ANY sport. He toughed out this victory, yeah Thiem was wild at a few shots but that's on him being impatient, Djokovic kept his **** under control and came up with the serving goods at the key moments in that last set.

Do what you gotta do to get the W even if your form is inconsistent.
 
When will AO end this scheduling nightmare? It should always have been equal days off for both parties after a slam SF. At the end of the day, the long matches Thiem had (before the final) caught up with him as he choked.
Novak shows why he is a champion and deservedly gets #17. This loss will badly sting for Dominic. 0-3 in slam finals and sometimes it becomes an insurmountable mental block.

On to Paris for RG. Draw will be critical. Whichever of Nadal or Djokovic gets Thiem in their half will have a Lopsided tough draw and could possibly lose the championship.
Will it be #18 for Novak at RG or #20 for Nadal at RG ? That might well decide the GOAT race..

Meanwhile NOT having new slam winners CANNOT be good for Tennis - an endless loop of fossils (no offense to Nadal/Fed/Djoko) ruling the sport. Tennis needs a NEW champion. FAST...
Thiem played 4 days consecutively in RG, including the final. That's a scheduling nightmare. Novak played many AO finals with one less day rest, so it's all good. I would say today it was Novak fighting himself more than fighting Thiem. It really shouldn't be this close among them on HC.
 

Raul_SJ

G.O.A.T.
Whichever of Nadal or Djokovic gets Thiem in their half will have a Lopsided tough draw and could possibly lose the championship.
Will it be #18 for Novak at RG or #20 for Nadal at RG ? That might well decide the GOAT race..

Djoker is clearly the world's #1 and should be seeded #1 at the French. Don't care how many times Rafa has won.
The French need to change their seeding system if they're going to seed Rafa #1; seeding should be based strictly on ranking.
 

marc45

G.O.A.T.





@christophclarey

Djokovic tells Aussie TV that he had no specific injury, just felt very low on energy and a bit dizzy during points. Was told he was dehydrated by medical staff. Started feeling better in 4th set
 

caesar66

Professional
Thiem was choking and nervous in the first set of his 4th GS final. Such a shame he could not hold his own serve.

Losing WTF final and this final shows he is lacking self belief to win the big titles.

Lets not start sugar coating Thiem's losses.

Not sugar coating it-should have closed it in the fourth and couldn’t contend with Novak when he bounced back. I just think characterizing the whole match as a choke-fest is painting with an equally broad brush.
 

TennisFan3

Talk Tennis Guru
Djoker is clearly the world's #1 and should be seeded #1 at the French. Don't care how many times Rafa has won.
The French need to change their seeding system if they're going to seed Rafa #1; seeding should be based strictly on ranking.
It does not matter who is seeded 1 or 2.
Point is that Djokovic and Nadal will be in opposite half as they are top 2 seeds.
One of them will get Thiem in the SF. Whoever gets Thiem will be at a significant disadvantage.
 

Raul_SJ

G.O.A.T.
It does not matter who is seeded 1 or 2.
Point is that Djokovic and Nadal will be in opposite half as they are top 2 seeds.
One of them will get Thiem in the SF. Whoever gets Thiem will be at a significant disadvantage.

It matters because Thiem will very likely be #3, especially if Fed skips the clay season.
 

TennisFan3

Talk Tennis Guru
It matters because Thiem will very likely be #3, especially if Fed skips the clay season.
Huh? That is what I am saying. Thiem will be #3 or #4 and one of Nadal or Djokovic will play Thiem in the SF. Whoever plays Thiem will be at a disadvantage. The other SF with Fed or Medvedev vs Novak or Nadal will be easier.
 

Raul_SJ

G.O.A.T.
Huh? That is what I am saying. Thiem will be #3 or #4 and one of Nadal or Djokovic will play Thiem in the SF. Whoever plays Thiem will be at a disadvantage. The other SF with Fed or Medvedev vs Novak or Nadal will be easier.

I am saying that Thiem will almost certainly be seeded #3.
Therefore it is critical that Djoker be seeded #1 at the French, so that Thiem is in Rafa's half of the draw.
But I think the French create their own seedings and can choose to ignore the rankings and seed Rafa #1 based on his past wins. That is a bad policy, IMO; seedings should be based on current rankings. Ranking points should be rewarded with higher seeds.
 

TennisFan3

Talk Tennis Guru
I am saying that Thiem will almost certainly be seeded #3.
Therefore it is critical that Djoker be seeded #1 at the French, so that Thiem is in Rafa's half of the draw.
But I think the French create their own seedings and can choose to ignore the rankings and seed Rafa #1 based on his past wins. That is a bad policy, IMO; seedings should be based on current rankings.

Do you know how tennis draw works?

It could be #1 vs #4 or #1 vs #3.

#3 can be with #1 seed or the #2 seed. The halfs are NOT fixed.
 

Jezza94

Rookie
Congrats to Nole on slam #17 and his 8th Australian Open. He's the King of Melbourne!

Commiserations to Thiem. He was very good today but fell short in the end.

The biggest thrill of the night was seeing my original favourite player, Marat Safin presenting the trophy to Nole. Safin was Djokovic's first opponent at Slam level and at the AO in 2005, in which Safin beat him 6-0 6-2 6-1.

images

Australian Open 2005 (1st Round)

20DnwrzyBFOXpbZKoe9iCNeh4ox2iN-KKmX0FcybMRmImnP4qC_8BC5MztcfP7OUmdzlBCGwOcYUaDRwZVDHY0ZCwWoBt4du1zFH4vg

Australian Open 2020 (Safin presenting Djokovic with the trophy)
 

Raul_SJ

G.O.A.T.
Do you know how tennis draw works?

It could be #1 vs #4 or #1 vs #3.

#3 can be with #1 seed or the #2 seed. The halfs are NOT fixed.

:unsure: Then the seedings rule needs to change so that #3 is always be in the bottom half..

Rafa was seeded #1 at the Australian Open. Djoker was seeded #2. Fed was seeded #3.
#1 Rafa and #2 Djoker were in seperate halves and guaranteed not to meet until the Finals.
#2 Djoker and #3 Fed were guaranteed to meet in the SF because #3 should always be in the second half.

Likewise, if the seedings at French are #1 Djoker, #2 Rafa and #3 Thiem, #2 Rafa and #3 Thiem will meet in the SF.
 

Mainad

Bionic Poster
The biggest thrill of the night was seeing my original favourite player, Marat Safin presenting the trophy to Nole. Safin was Djokovic's first opponent at Slam level and at the AO in 2005, in which Safin beat him 6-0 6-2 6-1.

images

Australian Open 2005 (1st Round)

20DnwrzyBFOXpbZKoe9iCNeh4ox2iN-KKmX0FcybMRmImnP4qC_8BC5MztcfP7OUmdzlBCGwOcYUaDRwZVDHY0ZCwWoBt4du1zFH4vg

Australian Open 2020 (Safin presenting Djokovic with the trophy)

"Haven't we met before?" :p
 
D

Deleted member 629564

Guest
The biggest thrill of the night was seeing my original favourite player, Marat Safin presenting the trophy to Nole. Safin was Djokovic's first opponent at Slam level and at the AO in 2005, in which Safin beat him 6-0 6-2 6-1.

(time travel to the 2005 press conference)
- Marat, that was quick, 21 games. Can you imagine you've just defeated the man who will win all his eight AO finals in the next 15 years?
- (laughing) You're funny guy.
 
Top