Well Rafa normally beats Thiem by keeping the ball in play and keeping the shots deep, waiting for Theim to be overly aggressive and star making errors. Rafa at a high level will just be more consistent in the rallies and handle the pressure points better. Thiem will come our swinging but will lose focus and concentration the longer and more intense the match becomes. The wins against Fed & Novak were 2 out of 3 and Thiem still has to prove himself in the slams outside the French. I assume this will be a day match which will be better for Rafa..
Good post.
The way for Nadal to beat Thiem is to be aggressive. That is how he won in Paris last year as well. Thiem is younger than Nadal and can easily outlast him. If Nadal needs to win, he has to do it in 3 or 4 sets.
There is no way he is outlasting Thiem in 5. Thiem has more experience now in decisive sets, plus he has waaay more stamina.
What I'm saying is that Nadal will just need to play far far better and basically outhit and outsmart Thiem. And quickly..
The court suits neither, IMO.
This surface suits Thiem much more than it does Nadal. Thiem benefits from the slower conditions in that he gets time to set up his shots. The way to beat Thiem is to take time away from him. You can't beat him from pace or run him ragged.
But if you make the ball hurry up to Thiem, so that he doesn't have enough time to set up his big shots, he becomes a UFE machine. You get him out of position, and you make him late for his big groundies.
On this court, Nadal's spin does NOT penetrate like other hardcourts. Darren Cahill in ESPN spend a lot of time talking about it. He said it's a myth that Nadal prefers slower courts. He wants a court where there is bounce and allows his spin to jump up. That is why hotter conditions are better for his game. He said that Nadal's forehand doesn't jump up on this court as much so Rafa cannot push his opponents back as he does in the UsOpen. Darren also said that the heavier fluffier balls here also don't suit Nadal and even do not suit Federer.