2020 US Open General Discussion (ATP)

MrFancypants

New User
It looks to me like he was trying to send the ball to the ball kids so they could collect it and put it on the other side of the net. The best move is to just take the second serve ball out of your pocket and leave it on the ground. The ball kids will scoop it up and take care of it. Players should stop trying to do the ball kids' job for them.

I figure most of us have hit a ball in anger. This did not look like that.
 

Carax

Hall of Fame
Last week at the US Open?

I was reading the article about Novak's default on ESPN and it said:

" 'In accordance with the Grand Slam rulebook, following his actions of intentionally hitting a ball dangerously or recklessly within the court or hitting a ball with negligent disregard of the consequences, the U.S. Open tournament referee defaulted Novak Djokovic from the 2020 U.S. Open,' the U.S. Tennis Association announced."


So, in addition to USTA and ATP rules, there are Grand Slam/ITF rules. So, if Bedene did it at the tournament before the USO, maybe that's why. If it was at the USO, I don't know.
That makes a lot of sense. Bedene hit the cameraman during the Western and Southern Open.
 

MrFancypants

New User
Not really, but it doesn't need to be out of anger. It was certainly hit "recklessly" per the rule since he hit it without even looking where he was hitting it.
Seems excessive.

So how many balls are hit "recklessly" according to that definition in a typical match?
 

BlueB

Legend
Honestly I would love that outcome, because this tournament is so crazy that it almost seems unfair for anyone to win it. Might as well end up in the hands of veterans who seem deserving of an award.

"And the award for most injured Canadian goes to ..." / "And the award for best comeback of 2020 goes to ..."
Oh yeah, best comeback - I'd love Coric to take it too!

Sent from my SM-G965W using Tapatalk
 

bluetrain4

G.O.A.T.
Seems excessive.

So how many balls are hit "recklessly" according to that definition in a typical match?

A lot, but most don't hit lines people which is the reason he was defaulted.

I get the argument that it's "excessive" but it's the rules. We can complain and nit pick, but they did it by the book.
 

cucio

Legend
The difference is Edberg was serving in match play and Djokovic hit the lineswomen outside of match play.

Exactly. Edberg's case was a freak accident, a one in a billion chance, but during match play everyone on the court knows balls are flying fast and knows to be prepared. In that situation the player can't be blamed, unless they clearly hit the ball on purpose towards someone.

But outside match play people relax and players shouldn't be hitting towards the back as hard and high as Nole did. It's a sensible rule: even if serious harm is extremely unlikely, no one likes being smacked in the face by a ball when not paying attention. Maybe the punishment assigned on the rule book could be milder, but every professional should be aware of this and be mindful of other people on the court.

Forget about points and money, the real loss for Novak is missing a clear shot at another slam, maybe two. Our loss, too. Things are already bleak, losing the #1 for the competition sucks.
 

mike danny

Bionic Poster
How on earth player like Thompson got into 4R?
cakewalk-idiom-meaning.png
 

MrFancypants

New User
A lot, but most don't hit lines people which is the reason he was defaulted.

I get the argument that it's "excessive" but it's the rules. We can complain and nit pick, but they did it by the book.
Serious question, if they roll a ball back and don’t look where it’s going and it taps a shoe is that reckless? Is DQ by the book?

This was not intentional. This was mostly peaceful.
 

bluetrain4

G.O.A.T.
Agree that umpires did the correct thing based on rules. No discussion there as rules say that intent does not matter.
If this is independent from intent, there was room for an Edberg disqualification in 1983, which did not happen. No intent that time too, and worse outcome.

The rules may not have been the same. Even if they were, Edberg was never a candidate for disqualification under these today's rules. The linesman was hit by an Edberg serve or overhead - an actual tennis shot from the point - thus not reckless at all. Edberg was not swatting a ball away in anger. Think of all the times we see linespeople duck a serve by turning their head one way or the other. Basically this linesperson didn't see it coming or couldn't move in time. It was not a Shapovalov or Djokovic situation.
 

Sudacafan

Bionic Poster
The rules may not have been the same. Even if they were, Edberg was never a candidate for disqualification under these today's rules. The linesman was hit by an Edberg serve or overhead - an actual tennis shot from the point - thus not reckless at all. Edberg was not swatting a ball away in anger. Think of all the times we see linespeople duck a serve by turning their head one way or the other. Basically this linesperson didn't see it coming or couldn't move in time. It was not a Shapovalov or Djokovic situation.
Agree. The important factor here that did Djokovic in was reckless behavior, more important than the issue of intention. That should get more emphasis.
 

MrFancypants

New User
Please be serious
I appreciate it’s frustrating.

what’s not serious about that? You hit a ball backward in the course of play. if you can perform an action that occurs during the course of regular play, and you can perform that action with no malice, at what point is it reckless?
 

Mkiske

Semi-Pro
It is important to learn from this episode and change the behavior on the court and focus only on the game.
 

Sudacafan

Bionic Poster
I totally agree.

Something always happens in Flushing Meadows with Novak. Now it's cool off, reflect, change and then think about clay.
Entering 2021, Novak‘s number of USO trophies will seem insufficient for him as the dominant hardcourt player of his era.
 

James P

G.O.A.T.
OOP Tomorrow (09/07/20 4R Bottom)

Ashe:
12:00 PM EST WTA
02:00 PM EST Auger-Aliassime/Thiem
07:00 PM EST Tiafoe/Medvedev
Followed By WTA

Armstrong:
11:00 AM EST Pospisil/De Minaur
Followed By WTA
Followed By Berrettini/Rublev
05:00 PM EST WTA
 

Meles

Bionic Poster
OOP Tomorrow (09/07/20 4R Bottom)

Ashe:
12:00 PM EST WTA
02:00 PM EST Auger-Aliassime/Thiem
07:00 PM EST Tiafoe/Medvedev
Followed By WTA

Armstrong:
11:00 AM EST Pospisil/De Minaur
Followed By WTA
Followed By Berrettini/Rublev
05:00 PM EST WTA
I can see why they flipped Mad weed with tim(mighty show/foe primetime), but probably enhances their opponents' chances.:confused:
 

James P

G.O.A.T.
3 Next Gen'rs on top w/ a Lost Gen'r
2 guaranteed Next Gen'rs on bottom
5 possibly 6 Next Gen'rs in the QFs this year
 

73west

Semi-Pro
The rules may not have been the same. Even if they were, Edberg was never a candidate for disqualification under these today's rules. The linesman was hit by an Edberg serve or overhead - an actual tennis shot from the point - thus not reckless at all. Edberg was not swatting a ball away in anger. Think of all the times we see linespeople duck a serve by turning their head one way or the other. Basically this linesperson didn't see it coming or couldn't move in time. It was not a Shapovalov or Djokovic situation.

Some of these comparisons are stretching so far to try to find some inconsistency.
As you said, Edberg's was *in play*.The rule isn't just that "intent" doesn't matter, it's that players are not supposed to recklessly disregard safety. No one ever accused Edberg of that.
The Federer clip someone posted - again, that is something that is *not* reckless and that is done all the time. Ball comes back, redirect it to a ballboy. 99.99% of the time, the ballboy puts a hand up, catches it, a few fans applaud the seamlessness of it. It was not reckless.

It feels like some people are pedantically trying to find some similarity between two wildly dissimilar circumstances.

The rule is pretty simple and it's for a simple reason. You shouldn't just knock the ball around recklessly because you could accidentally hit and injure someone. Just like Djokovic did.
 

Nostradamus

Bionic Poster

WOW,,, why is nobody talking about Berrentini and Rublev. both of these guys are extremely dangerous and can beat anyone left in the draw. Especially Berrentini was very close last year, and could have won last year.
 

D-Lite

Hall of Fame

WOW,,, why is nobody talking about Berrentini and Rublev. both of these guys are extremely dangerous and can beat anyone left in the draw. Especially Berrentini was very close last year, and could have won last year.
I think Berrettini will take it in 4 sets - he has some huge weapons. Rublev was playing well before the lockdown, and he will be Matteo's first big test, and likewise Matteo will be his, but I think Berrettini is primed for a bigger result this USO.
 
Top