Tennis_Freak99
Legend
Oh my god
Definitely. It's what Federer said, your game might be enough to beat one of them from time to time (especially their old versions), but it probably won't be enough to beat one of the others at the same tournament. It's part of what made it so hard for the other players to win anything when they were all in their prime.
Of the younger players, Thiem looks like the most capable of beating multiple declined Big 3, at least.
But in Grand Slams all of the young guys lose to Nadal and Djokovic most of the time. Thiem had the best Slam wins against less declined versions of them.Thiem? I don't know. He has decent h2h against them, because he plays a big game. In a M1000, I think he can smoke all three. But in the Slams, their creativity is on full display, 9 times out of 10, and that's just a bit much for him, imo.
Thought Novak was done and sent into oblivionWhat a gorgeous match point. Congrats to the best player in the world.
37 Masters.
But in Grand Slams all of the young guys lose to Nadal and Djokovic most of the time. Thiem had the best Slam wins against less declined versions of them.
Called it. Medvedev crumbles under pressure when matches get close. He has to win them in straight sets or max 4 sets if it's best of 5.I think it's either Djokovic in 3 or Medvedev in 2. Djokovic seems very likely to drop a set, given the way he's been playing this tournament, but Medvedev is worse in the big moments so if it's 1 set all, Djokovic takes it.
I might be wrong but that's how I see it.
still hurts you guys so muchHere come the boobs!