I was telling you jokers that
Bull was vulnerable this season and Tsits had a real shot at RG, but you didn't listen. And shortly before the final I said
it'd be a lot more competitive than was expected and called a 5-setter, but you still didn't listen.
When will you clowns realize I'm right about everything I pay attention to and you should be honored that I share my genius and wisdom free of charge? In that generous spirit I'll set y'all straight for good: this Rafa was nothing special,
winning just over 60% of his games this CC season which usually
ain't enough vs. another elite dirtballer. Of course Nadal is Nadal and you still can't slack off against him at RG, but anyone who saw the 2nd half of the SF should know he can no longer keep it up 100% for the whole duration of a match himself. This may strike you as far-fetched but even peak Pistol and Murray would've had a good chance of beating him that day.
What Novak does deserve credit for: 1) keeping himself ready for his worst Slam almost every year and 2) being the first FO champ since '93 Bruguera to down not one but two fellow members of the 60% Club in Rafa and Tsits who didn't quite build on his strong start to the season but still ended up with 60.3% (2nd only to Novak's 61.5%).
One more thing:
You clearly lifted this from one of those mostly useless "analytics" sites (I'm guessing UTS) because these #s are just combined carbon copies of the ATP's SG/RG%s with no TBs. Also '15 Rafa won an extra 64.6% outside the regular CC season, which if separated does bring his seasonal GW% down to 58.3%, but the difference between this and his actual 60.7% is almost negligible because, as i noted earlier, neither provides enough cushion against another strong FO contender. The fact of the matter is that either '15 or '21 Rafa would be vulnerable to
select former runners-up having their best season(s), let alone actual champs.
Guess I still should be pleased that more of you are paying attention to GW%s on clay, but not so much about the motivations.