2021 Roland Garros - Men's Singles - General Discussion

Winner?


  • Total voters
    164
  • Poll closed .

reef58

Semi-Pro
He had extremely tough physical battles against Schwartzman in slams. A match doesn't have to be 5 sets in order to be tough. Last year's semifinal was just 40 minutes shorter than Djokovic's 5 set win over Tsitsipas.

Butt picking takes up time man
 

ACE of Hearts

Bionic Poster
I like my Nordic neighbour Mikael Ymer, but I have absolutely no interest in seeing him get whooped by Humbalito. Human backboard, no weapons.

get it together Jannik

Sure but i don’t see much of a chance by Jannik against rafaelito but we shall see .I feel a night match could be a disaster for him.
 

Sysyphus

Talk Tennis Guru
Sure but i don’t see much of a chance by Jannik against rafaelito but we shall see .I feel a night match could be a disaster for him.

99.9% chance Jannik gets the same treatment as everyone else Rafaello plays at RG of course, but he at least has the weapons to potentially make it interesting. Saw that last year. With Ymer, there's not even the 0.1%, outside of scenarios involving Bull getting hit by a meteor or something of the sort -- and perhaps not even then.
 

Cortana

Legend
fogbkg7.png
 

skip1969

G.O.A.T.
Lol, what's wrong with underhanded serves?
I just think that as a top-tier professional tennis player, there are a myriad of options available to you if your opponent is returning from the bleachers. A kick serve, a slice, a short, angled serve . . . I mean, any well-placed serve can put you in the driving seat when someone stands way back. Serving underhanded means you're either to dense or too afraid to try any of those things. You're simply looking to catch your opponent out.

For a club player, maybe. If your shoulder is injured, okay. But, in my view it makes a pro look silly. Reminds me of moonballing, back in the day. Sure, it was technically a legit tactic. But once you started doing it, the crowd would jeer and give you stick because they see it as a cowardly, last-ditch tactic employed because you can't win the honest way.

But yes, I get it. Do anything to win.
 
I just think that as a top-tier professional tennis player, there are a myriad of options available to you if your opponent is returning from the bleachers. A kick serve, a slice, a short, angled serve . . . I mean, any well-placed serve can put you in the driving seat when someone stands way back. Serving underhanded means you're either to dense or too afraid to try any of those things. You're simply looking to catch your opponent out.

For a club player, maybe. If your shoulder is injured, okay. But, in my view it makes a pro look silly. Reminds me of moonballing, back in the day. Sure, it was technically a legit tactic. But once you started doing it, the crowd would jeer and give you stick because they see it as a cowardly, last-ditch tactic employed because you can't win the honest way.

But yes, I get it. Do anything to win.
I've disagreed on this forever. As long as it's a legal shot, why not implement it as a regular part of your arsenal? I know some guys have been using it in recent years, but they'll do it max once or twice in a match. I, however, would like to see someone have the balls to use it on 10/15/20% of their serves, just to keep the backboard returners honest. I'm aware of the stigma, but I wish it'd just go away. Does anyone have a problem with pitchers throwing change-ups or curveballs? After all, they too have infinite options with their fastballs, splitters and sliders...
 
N

Nuclear Warhead Sinner

Guest
100 cameras filming the match and they can't review the call because of "tradition". Clown world. Absolute clown world we live in. Joke of a civilization.
 
N

Nuclear Warhead Sinner

Guest
Ymer redlining like Mario on shrooms. Despite that, Sinner holds. ATG in the making, folks.
 
Top