ericykchan
Rookie
So few people played with the 100, I am quite surprised...
Apparently i am the only one who likes V-square, but i have used Cylcone 18 in my 18x20 with good results, why not try 18 or 19 v-square if you are looking for some spin. Hyper-G has never worked for me as it hurts my arm, but V-square and cyclone doesn't.
I do, I played with 97d, and was buying the new one for sure but I could demo both 97d and 100 and playing was very pleasant with 100, nowadays I am playing quite more on clay and was very forgiving in long rallies and surprisingly, for me, a very good control and stability. I never expected to play a 100 but I feel so good with this one. In the near future I will try a leather grip and a bit of lead tape on the frame.So few people played with the 100, I am quite surprised...
So few people played with the 100, I am quite surprised...
What did you use as crosses?I really like the Lynx Tour mains in the 310 version. Really like. The control is there and the stiffer, more crispy feel is a perfect accent to the frame. I don't feel like it is muted at all and instead really has a explosive sweet spot.
More importantly I am starting to gel with this racquet more now and hitting the shots I need to set up my patterns. This frame has some rather nice power to it and the spin I can generate is really heavy. I really think this is a perfect frame for a V7 Blade fan who wants something a little faster to swing, with a more HL balance.
got a pair of the vCore Pro D in a trade
Serial numbers are pretty far off so I wonder if it has anything to do with the strung specs.
336g 319mm 321SW
338g 320mm 328SW
Hoping that just a touch of lead on the lighter one will bring balance and SW to match.
At least it wasn't as far off from my vCore 95s were. I'll hit with it for a little bit with the strings and then I'll cut out and do some bare frame matching.
What did you use as crosses?
I really like the Lynx Tour mains in the 310 version. Really like. The control is there and the stiffer, more crispy feel is a perfect accent to the frame. I don't feel like it is muted at all and instead really has a explosive sweet spot.
Anyone tried gut/poly on the new VCP 97 310?97HD and probably the new 97D are perfect candidates for gut/poly. Maybe go with a bit of a crisper poly though for the crosses. Something like gut/poly tour pro is still good, but I think it's a bit muted for that frame.
I like the vs gut/rpm hybrid. Can get it in a single pack which is kinda convenient too.
Anyone tried gut/poly on the new VCP 97 310?
My 97H feels great with gut mains/poly crosses. It really improves the feel compared to full poly IMO. I imagine it would be even better in the 310 since it's a less powerful frame.
got a pair of the vCore Pro D in a trade
Serial numbers are pretty far off so I wonder if it has anything to do with the strung specs.
336g 319mm 321SW
338g 320mm 328SW
Hoping that just a touch of lead on the lighter one will bring balance and SW to match.
At least it wasn't as far off from my vCore 95s were. I'll hit with it for a little bit with the strings and then I'll cut out and do some bare frame matching.
with gut/poly or syngut/poly - do the strings move around at all or do they stay in place?
This frame has some rather nice power to it and the spin I can generate is re I really think this is a perfect frame for a V7 Blade fan who wants something a little faster to swing, with a more HL balance.
For a One-handed backhand definitely try the VCP 97 or the Vcore 95Hi all, i'm currently using Ezone 98 Tour. But sometimes i'm having issue with my one-handed backhand (i think because the balance) and sometimes it feels heavy on the swingweight. I'd really like to try the VCP 97, what do you guys think? considering in my country we cannot demo the racket. Thanks
really think this is a perfect frame for a V7 Blade fan who wants something a little faster to swing, with a more HL balance.
Same string (Black Pearl Rough) so i really didn't think it would alter specs...but just stated that is what I got when measuring it. Just a touch of lead should fix itStrung with what?
hit with the 97D for about 45 minutes so far with the string it came with (black pearl rough). I really enjoyed the flex, feel, plow of the racquet and it swung fairly fast. I let one of the college players who is down to one eZone 98 of the previous model and he likes it. Might be a good replacement but will really give it a go after an upcoming tournament.
I am the guy who adds leather to almost every racquet. I wonder how it would affect this particular racquet. I have yet to hit serves and volleys with it. I do like it stock ATM. I might even copy the specs onto my vCore 95...but not sure. Really nice racquet.
Now another thing I'm thinking of is how the 310 version plays. Yes...16m/18m...but if I get the 310 I have some room to customize. Add leather and touches of lead with out making the racquet too heavy. hhhhmmmm
I'm pretty soon, as soon as I get on court with my 97D.Anyone familiar with the 360+ Prestige MP that has hit with the 97D?
9.0 mixed?Made the wholesale switch to VCP100 last month, Lux/gut hybrid. Went undefeated in our 9.0 sectional and headed to Nationals next month. Coming from Pure Aero and EZone 100+, love the 63RA and balance. Not quite as good on serves but control and comfort exceptional everywhere else. Not a "power" racquet but at 9-all in a third set match tiebreak when everything is on the line, power is overrated. A lot of guys with Pure Drive 107's and other widebodies went home lol.
thanks. will look for your feedbackI'm pretty soon, as soon as I get on court with my 97D.
M55+. Going to Orlando.9.0 mixed?
I found the prestige mp to be very low powered. Great feel though.Anyone familiar with the 360+ Prestige MP that has hit with the 97D?
Conclusion: I'm buying more, you may or may not want to depending on $$$$ and rack-aholic level. I'm switching from Vcore 95 (2021) to the D.
Quality control:
Let's put the rumors of changing quality control of Yonex to bed, look at this selection I got from TW using their matching service:
#1: W:324.27g Bal:31.1cm SW:292
#2: W:324.38g Bal:31.1cm SW:292
#3: W:324.22g Bal:31.1cm SW:292
I love my HD’s, but the tweaks they made for the D are exactly what I would have asked. Do you have any comments regarding the change from 20 mm (HD) to 21 mm (D) beam?VCP D review, I'll go in reverse from conclusion to details that you may or may not care about.
Conclusion: I'm buying more, you may or may not want to depending on $$$$ and rack-aholic level. I'm switching from Vcore 95 (2021) to the D.
The D is almost an HD clone.
HD versus D: A 5% bump in power, an interesting feel of balance with the extended "throat", if you liked the HD get the D, it is an improvement, but not to the extent you will win more matches just by making the switch. I also like the color on the D more than the HD, don't judge me, but I do.
Playtime about 30 hours now over a few weeks.
Strings: Full natural gut 50lbs, will order my second one with a gut/poly hybrid, any suggestions are welcome.
Previous rackets: Vcore HD for 2 years, Vcore 95 (2020) 1 year, Vcore 95 (2021) 8 months. VCP 330, Head speed Pro, Prestige MP, DR 98 plus, Pure Strike Tour, various years ago.
How it compares/plays:
Forehand is the key for me: Switching from the 95 to the D I found the qualities I enjoyed with the HD. The 95 is awesome, amazing racket and if you have a more semi-western/western forehand maybe better to allow for more whip like action, for me the small decrease in weight encouraged me to whip/wrist/ be lazy with my forehand, kind of a bad habit. I am enjoying the difference with the D because it forces me to prepare early and takes my forehand form on a more linear path and the ball I personally produce is heavier. By heavier, it doesn't look faster or more impressive but the result is opponents are miss-hitting my forehand because of the penetration and power of the topspin, it's a little different than the 95 result I get which is more wrist manufactured topspin. That's my own technique issue, not the racket, so the 95 is certainly great if you have a certain type of forehand.
For my one-handed backhand: both are great, D and 95, but the D can give me a slightly heavier boom to the flatter one hander I hit. Slices are easier to get deep and penetrating, but I need to prepare early and not just slap at it like I can with the 95.
Serves: are a little heavier and less "crafty" than the 95.
Volleys: really are great with both the 95 and D.
The only adjustment I needed some time on was the overhead, prepare earlier with the D because I can't just muscle flick it with bad form like I could with the 95.
Quality control:
Let's put the rumors of changing quality control of Yonex to bed, look at this selection I got from TW using their matching service:
#1: W:324.27g Bal:31.1cm SW:292
#2: W:324.38g Bal:31.1cm SW:292
#3: W:324.22g Bal:31.1cm SW:292
To really decide if you want this over the HD I would ask yourself if you want slightly more power, you might demo it to feel the slight difference with whatever they did with the throat, and if you like the color (yes, I'm serious). If you love your HD and aren't the racket-holic like most, you are probably not missing anything revolutionary.
I think the D and HD benefit me with a mix of semi-western/eastern hybrid forehand, long arms/long strokes (6'4"), and my serve is hard, flat, and then I have a few versions of lefty knuckleball and small kick serve. I think the 95 or other rackets might be better for a pure kick serve style and other rackets besides the HD, D, and 95 "might" be better for 2 handed bachands.
VCP H: One final note, I played with the VCP 330 for awhile. I think some might gravitate toward that or the new VCP H because of the open pattern. I've had both the VCP HD and 330 overlayed on each other, there is almost not difference in the sweet spot on the spacing of the strings. Now, the weight difference is real. I'm going to venture out on a limb having not hit the VCP H yet, that it is too heavy, it's different than the 330, unlike the D which is about the same as the HD. I found almost no spin difference in the rackets, so I would be cautious using the super heavy new H. I'm not even demo-ing it, curious to hear the reviews though.
I like the extra weight. It helps me get out of my bad habits with my forehand, the weight pulls my arm into place as I swing so to speak as opposed to me veering off course and being able to flick topspin with my arm. The difference in weight isn't huge, but that is the result. I do think I could play with the 310 and win 90% of the same matches I would win with the D, but for me I like it. Also, the tighter pattern is something I enjoy more even though I mentioned the difference is slight, I think the pattern on the HD an D hits the ball at a trajectory I am more familiar with.Thanks for the detailed review. I'm currently playing with Vcore 95 (2021) and looking forward to switching to the Vcore Pro, either 310 or D. What is your opinion of 310? Why did you prefer the D, considering that 95 and 310 are of the exactly same weight?
It looks like all the reports about quality control are concerning either 310 (low SW) and H (high SW), but not D. I'm just speculating here, but maybe D was the original development model, and 310 and H adjustments?
I think that is where the extra 5% power comes from, it is very very slight, but it is there in my opinion.I love my HD’s, but the tweaks they made for the D are exactly what I would have asked. Do you have any comments regarding the change from 20 mm (HD) to 21 mm (D) beam?
Appreciate the detailed review as one of my current racquets is also the HD. I have been monitoring this thread closely as I was trying to decide between the new 310 and the D without the benefit of demos.VCP D review, I'll go in reverse from conclusion to details that you may or may not care about.
Conclusion: I'm buying more, you may or may not want to depending on $$$$ and rack-aholic level. I'm switching from Vcore 95 (2021) to the D.
The D is almost an HD clone.
HD versus D: A 5% bump in power, an interesting feel of balance with the extended "throat", if you liked the HD get the D, it is an improvement, but not to the extent you will win more matches just by making the switch. I also like the color on the D more than the HD, don't judge me, but I do.
Playtime about 30 hours now over a few weeks.
Strings: Full natural gut 50lbs, will order my second one with a gut/poly hybrid, any suggestions are welcome.
Previous rackets: Vcore HD for 2 years, Vcore 95 (2020) 1 year, Vcore 95 (2021) 8 months. VCP 330, Head speed Pro, Prestige MP, DR 98 plus, Pure Strike Tour, various years ago.
How it compares/plays:
Forehand is the key for me: Switching from the 95 to the D I found the qualities I enjoyed with the HD. The 95 is awesome, amazing racket and if you have a more semi-western/western forehand maybe better to allow for more whip like action, for me the small decrease in weight encouraged me to whip/wrist/ be lazy with my forehand, kind of a bad habit. I am enjoying the difference with the D because it forces me to prepare early and takes my forehand form on a more linear path and the ball I personally produce is heavier. By heavier, it doesn't look faster or more impressive but the result is opponents are miss-hitting my forehand because of the penetration and power of the topspin, it's a little different than the 95 result I get which is more wrist manufactured topspin. That's my own technique issue, not the racket, so the 95 is certainly great if you have a certain type of forehand.
For my one-handed backhand: both are great, D and 95, but the D can give me a slightly heavier boom to the flatter one hander I hit. Slices are easier to get deep and penetrating, but I need to prepare early and not just slap at it like I can with the 95.
Serves: are a little heavier and less "crafty" than the 95.
Volleys: really are great with both the 95 and D.
The only adjustment I needed some time on was the overhead, prepare earlier with the D because I can't just muscle flick it with bad form like I could with the 95.
Quality control:
Let's put the rumors of changing quality control of Yonex to bed, look at this selection I got from TW using their matching service:
#1: W:324.27g Bal:31.1cm SW:292
#2: W:324.38g Bal:31.1cm SW:292
#3: W:324.22g Bal:31.1cm SW:292
To really decide if you want this over the HD I would ask yourself if you want slightly more power, you might demo it to feel the slight difference with whatever they did with the throat, and if you like the color (yes, I'm serious). If you love your HD and aren't the racket-holic like most, you are probably not missing anything revolutionary.
I think the D and HD benefit me with a mix of semi-western/eastern hybrid forehand, long arms/long strokes (6'4"), and my serve is hard, flat, and then I have a few versions of lefty knuckleball and small kick serve. I think the 95 or other rackets might be better for a pure kick serve style and other rackets besides the HD, D, and 95 "might" be better for 2 handed bachands.
VCP H: One final note, I played with the VCP 330 for awhile. I think some might gravitate toward that or the new VCP H because of the open pattern. I've had both the VCP HD and 330 overlayed on each other, there is almost not difference in the sweet spot on the spacing of the strings. Now, the weight difference is real. I'm going to venture out on a limb having not hit the VCP H yet, that it is too heavy, it's different than the 330, unlike the D which is about the same as the HD. I found almost no spin difference in the rackets, so I would be cautious using the super heavy new H. I'm not even demo-ing it, curious to hear the reviews though.
Way to go!M55+. Going to Orlando.
Quoting myselfCurious to hear from anybody who has tested the new VC100 (Red & Blue) vs. the new VCP100 (Purple & Green)? On paper they look very similar but how different do they play?
I think that is where the extra 5% power comes from, it is very very slight, but it is there in my opinion.
There is something there that is different and I think it is the throat situation they changed and the stiffness, it is slightly more "normal" feeling than "soft" the D to the HD. Precision seems to be the same for me, I had no issues at all with that changing. Personally, I think they added some power through stiffness and therefore removed some of the softness of the HD, which I don't think that extreme softness was necessary in the HD. I remember serving first serves sometimes with the HD and thinking I really need to hit the $@#$ out of the ball, come on, hit it, to get the full oomph. The D seems to not need that. All of these changes are very small, more a tweak than a change for me, but all good.Thanks for the review @FuzzyYellowBalls
When it comes to the feel, is there a difference between the HD and the D (I'm not talking power)? If you have hit with the 360+ PMP, how does the D compare when it comes to feel and precision?
Cheers
I'll do that next. Vs rpm most likely.Anyone tried gut/poly on the new VCP 97 310?
Poly Tour Pro is very comfortable but super low powered. Probably not a good string for the VCP 310.I'll do that next. Vs rpm most likely.
In my brief few outings with 310version it felt that the stick could benefit from that little bit of extra zing gut mains provides.
As a reference my 310gr version is stock and currently strung with ptp 125 black
Do you play the D without added weights and with original grip? I had to add weight to my HD for stability and power…I like the extra weight. It helps me get out of my bad habits with my forehand, the weight pulls my arm into place as I swing so to speak as opposed to me veering off course and being able to flick topspin with my arm. The difference in weight isn't huge, but that is the result. I do think I could play with the 310 and win 90% of the same matches I would win with the D, but for me I like it. Also, the tighter pattern is something I enjoy more even though I mentioned the difference is slight, I think the pattern on the HD an D hits the ball at a trajectory I am more familiar with.
It seems the new 310 is closer now to the D in weight, so it might be better for more players, maybe even me, but I'm done testing for now.
And btw did you receive a racquet as part of a promotion/nice review deal?