Power Player
Bionic Poster
I think the vcp H is YYs prostock release honestly. Soft feel, huge classic weighting. Its a demanding frame that probably has amazing feel to it. Essentially yonexs take on the blade pro.
I think the vcp H is YYs prostock release honestly. Soft feel, huge classic weighting. Its a demanding frame that probably has amazing feel to it. Essentially yonexs take on the blade pro.
What exactly is the aim? Has Yonex intentionally designed a 340+ SW?What is strange is that it appears that Yonex is aiming for an average swingweight in the 340s in this frame. It’s not only massive in its own right for a retail racquet but it’s more than 10 points higher than the swingweight of the last couple versions of this frame. It’s a huge bump. It may make the frame very difficult to play with, even for people like me who played with one of those older versions of this racquet.
TW still says that the swingweight they list is based only on two samples. So the average listed swingweight might change after they do their normal ten racquet measurement. That said, if the average stays in the mid 340s, then yes, I think we can safely say that Yonex has intentionally decided to substantially raise the swingweight on this particular frame.What exactly is the aim? Has Yonex intentionally designed a 340+ SW?
This guy gets it. Well said.I completely agree. What follows is not directed at @Power Player ... as I said I agree with you.
Many on these boards complain of wanting Pro Stock racquets offered to retail customers (I amongst them). Well, here it is. Now, back up all the talk, step up, and try it. Then decide. Ask for lower SW offerings from the racquets available (if it's too much for you), or find a way to make it work. The only thing that is not Pro Stock about this racquet is that it is already 330g unstrung, so in some sense, it's good to go from the start without the need to mod it up.
I bought myself the BP 16x19 (308g, 313SW, 325mm balance (unstrung - from memory), and after mods... 343g, 324SW, 305mm balance (Unstrung)). It plays fantastic. It's stable, has an excellent sweet zone/spot, great control AND power, is excellent on offense and defense, and I can play with it for hours.
I don't see any problems here. Yonex has clearly laid it out for all of us. For those that complain about wanting Pro Stock specs and racquets... they gave us the 330g version, for those that want to create their own specs... the 310g, for those that want a tighter stringbed... the 97D, and for those that want a Gravity competitor but prefer Yonex... the 100 with a 63RA. It's all covered.
There is a full spectrum available. Pick the one that suits you and get on with it. Not all racquets are supposed to suit all people. I think it's great they are giving us a wide range to satisfy all levels and requirements.
Understood. Just not sure why a manufacturer would avoid sharing the intended spec. I suppose it’s just a really difficult component to control.TW still says that the swingweight they list is based only on two samples. So the average listed swingweight might change after they do their normal ten racquet measurement. That said, if the average stays in the mid 340s, then yes, I think we can safely say that Yonex has intentionally decided to substantially raise the swingweight on this particular frame.
That’s an interesting theory…simply about where are their priorities across the line…personally I feel that the answer to the high SW for the 330g might be much more mundane. perhaps in previous versions they'd go and make a perfect 330g, then a layer or two less of carbon fibre to get a 310g. so both duel g and vcore pro 97 310g felt slightly light and flimsy (duel g) to me, but 330s were perfect as is.
now, after concluding that 310g should be their focus, they are maybe engineering and making a perfect 310 or 320, then add a layer or two to get to 330g, and the racquet is then a bit off, too heavy in the head.
or they are compensating for the extra flex in the throat with more SW and mass to the head...
in manufacturing things tend to be simpler than we as consumers imagine..
It’s funny how much a TW playtest can impact perception, but I also heard Michelle repeatedly talking about it as being too hefty and was like, woah, if she’s struggling, this must be really heavy in the hand.I hope the early H racquets are just a mistake and will have a SW closer to 330...
I've used the 330 going back to the vcore tour version and anything over 340 for sw will be too much. If Michelle, who plays with the RF 97, says it's too hard to swing then I think that's sure going to limit the players that will be able to or want to use it.
Feel like I should pipe in here and offer a little more than what you can see/hear in the videosWe also have an upcoming podcast (with Troy! and Mark and Brittany) that takes a deeper dive into this line and we go into depth about some of this stuff that has been brought up...
With that said, this is from Troy:
"I wasn't able to make this review, as I was working the TW Store at the WTA tournament in San Jose. I did play with it, and liked it, but the swingweight on our testers was a bit high. If I were to consider switching to something like this, I would be using the TW MRT services to try and find one with a swingweight more in my spec range of about 300-305 unstrung. I also really enjoyed the 97D in stock form, great feel." He also said, "If I were in the market for one of these, I would be contacting the TW racquet experts, and making and MRT request to search for the lowest swingweight option in a given batch, or closest to 301-302 unstrung, which is pretty much what I used with the older version of the VCORE Pro 97 330, and my Six One 95 18x20's over the years. I would likely just go Super Grap on the stock grip, and call it good."
In the podcast (coming soon but you might have to wait for that a couple weeks, sorry!!), Troy talks about hoping to find racquets with a bit of a lower swingweight and going from there once we have more racquets in stock. Unfortunately, sometimes during these playtests we only have one or two frames to hit and our specs at the moment (which are subject to change) reflect the hitters we have.
And from me, this new version seems to be the Vcore Pro 97 330 I have struggled the most with, but that might 100% be a me problem! The past year or so has been a challenge for all of us in different ways and I definitely haven't been lifting as heavy as I might have been before (don't get me wrong, I'm still in the gym and working out as much if not more but guess it is time to start piling on the weight! Got a nice heavy leg sesh in yesterday!). Also, it is worth remembering that I've never been the die-hard Yonex fan that some of the other playtesters are and I have been hitting the RF97 consistently for several years now (although I have been craving some hitting sessions with my racquet of choice and my go-to string set up, sometimes we are testing so much weeks go by before you get to hit what you call 'home' and I've been all over the place with testing strings and a bunch of racquets that aren't mine). And lastly, yes, I have hitters of my RF up in the 340s in terms of swingweight as well and I go through phases where that is the only racquet I want to swing; but I'd say as of this moment, the racquets in the 335-339 SW range have been the ones I've been gravitating toward most often.
All those excuses aside, we will be excited to get more racquets in stock and we will obviously be speccing more once we have more to spec and go from there!and as always, DEMO DEMO DEMO!
Hope that helps a bit,
Michelle, TW
This is really helpful. Thanks for including Troy's thoughts, as well as elaborating your own. I'm looking forward to the podcast.Feel like I should pipe in here and offer a little more than what you can see/hear in the videosWe also have an upcoming podcast (with Troy! and Mark and Brittany) that takes a deeper dive into this line and we go into depth about some of this stuff that has been brought up...
With that said, this is from Troy:
"I wasn't able to make this review, as I was working the TW Store at the WTA tournament in San Jose. I did play with it, and liked it, but the swingweight on our testers was a bit high. If I were to consider switching to something like this, I would be using the TW MRT services to try and find one with a swingweight more in my spec range of about 300-305 unstrung. I also really enjoyed the 97D in stock form, great feel." He also said, "If I were in the market for one of these, I would be contacting the TW racquet experts, and making and MRT request to search for the lowest swingweight option in a given batch, or closest to 301-302 unstrung, which is pretty much what I used with the older version of the VCORE Pro 97 330, and my Six One 95 18x20's over the years. I would likely just go Super Grap on the stock grip, and call it good."
In the podcast (coming soon but you might have to wait for that a couple weeks, sorry!!), Troy talks about hoping to find racquets with a bit of a lower swingweight and going from there once we have more racquets in stock. Unfortunately, sometimes during these playtests we only have one or two frames to hit and our specs at the moment (which are subject to change) reflect the hitters we have.
And from me, this new version seems to be the Vcore Pro 97 330 I have struggled the most with, but that might 100% be a me problem! The past year or so has been a challenge for all of us in different ways and I definitely haven't been lifting as heavy as I might have been before (don't get me wrong, I'm still in the gym and working out as much if not more but guess it is time to start piling on the weight! Got a nice heavy leg sesh in yesterday!). Also, it is worth remembering that I've never been the die-hard Yonex fan that some of the other playtesters are and I have been hitting the RF97 consistently for several years now (although I have been craving some hitting sessions with my racquet of choice and my go-to string set up, sometimes we are testing so much weeks go by before you get to hit what you call 'home' and I've been all over the place with testing strings and a bunch of racquets that aren't mine). And lastly, yes, I have hitters of my RF up in the 340s in terms of swingweight as well and I go through phases where that is the only racquet I want to swing; but I'd say as of this moment, the racquets in the 335-339 SW range have been the ones I've been gravitating toward most often.
All those excuses aside, we will be excited to get more racquets in stock and we will obviously be speccing more once we have more to spec and go from there!and as always, DEMO DEMO DEMO!
Hope that helps a bit,
Michelle, TW
The one I demoed had less pop than my stock VC95s. I wouldn’t have been surprised if it was in the low 310 or below.My 310 had a strung sw of 308…. Measured with head 3-in-1 unit
The one I demoed had less pop than my stock VC95s. I wouldn’t have been surprised if it was in the low 310 or below.
Also, the type and gauge of strings you use + a 4g dampener can greatly affect the swingweight - especially if you are close to the most you can handle.
My VC95 was 320sw with 1.25 PolyTour Air installed and dropped to 313.5 when replaced with Solinco Confidential 1.15 (both measured on a Gosen electronic machine).
My navy VCP 330g was too much for me with 1.30 Cyclone Tour. With an 18g poly hybrid, the lightest dampener I could find (Tourna Sampras - you could also go rubber band), and a leather grip to lower the balance point, its much more manageable.
Was it dramatically less pop? I guess if the SW was that low, it was. That's not enough juice.
I'll be interested in how that works out for me. The VC95 has really impressed me and may be tough to beat. I am looking for control, but not so much that I get exhausted. The VC95 has a really nice balance there, but my stock SW is ~325.
Yes, but imo both the ‘18 and ‘21 VCore 95 are better rackets than all VCP97. The DG97 might edge out the ‘18 VC95 for the first place on my list, but I never got to play them s/s.
The new VCP97 is a nice frame, but imo it’s a step in the wrong direction for that line. When it comes to feel, the Prestige MP+ f.inst. is in another league. The low stiffness ratings have no significant relevance due to the dampening tech that robs the frame of most of its feel, again imho.
I stopped using a dampener a while back, and I think you’re absolutely right reg the ‘21 VCore 95; a dampener and a dead stringbed would make that frame way too muted.Yeah good to know. I think the Vc95 is pretty muted but I love the feel of it. Its just enough to reward hammering the sweetspot with nice feel.
I was thinking maybe starting with Lynx Tour in the VCp97 since that is a crisp string. And I don’t use a dampener. Maybe that will open up the feel a little. I am just guessing since I haven’t used the frame, but it seems like we have similar taste since the 21 VC95 has really wowwed me.
To me the handle dampening tech in the new yonex makes using a dampener not needed. I am not sure I would enjoy the feel of the VC95 if it had a dampener in it. I had a similar revelation with the Blade v7. Used a sampras O damp in it because thats all I haveused for years and years but once I finally removed it, the frame felt much better.
I stopped using a dampener a while back, and I think you’re absolutely right reg the ‘21 VCore 95; a dampener and a dead stringbed would make that frame way too muted.
Sounds like a non-dead string setup ;-)I use a 21 Vcore 95 with the beefy Yonex dampener and a hybrid strung at 45 lbs (breaks in to 40 lbs after an hour or two).
Sounds like a non-dead string setup ;-)
I like a lively poly at lower tensions, but f.inst. the ptp/pts hybrid i had in one of my vc95 was pretty dead to my amazement (40/44).
True, diadem solstice power is fairly crisp, evolution is a bit muted, very unique monofilament polyamide.
I agree about the dampener. I feel better everytime I take it off or put just Tourna rubber.Have you tried no damp? That YY dampener is a feel rapist imo, lol. I don't think I could do it - would probably feel like the latest Pure strike to me.
I played the VC95 without a dampener the other day. The feel was quite nice. But I just can't get used to the sound without the dampener.Have you tried no damp? That YY dampener is a feel rapist imo, lol. I don't think I could do it - would probably feel like the latest Pure strike to me.
I played the VC95 without a dampener the other day. The feel was quite nice. But I just can't get used to the sound without the dampener.
Your guidance has rarely lead me in the wrong direction in the past. Once it stops raining here, I'll give both the 100 and the 95 another go without the dampener and see what I think.I used to say the same thing but you can. I never notice the sound now after a 5 min warmup.
Your guidance has rarely lead me in the wrong direction in the past. Once it stops raining here, I'll give both the 100 and the 95 another go without the dampener and see what I think.
#64 rubber band is the best dampener
I have used it ever since I first saw Aggasi use one
I saw a guy that had taken a 1/2" wide strip of memory foam and weaved it across the bottom part of the stringbed.i dont like dampeners that work too well either. never understood how the ppl w worms do it. feel like i cant tell where the ball is going if the dampener is too effective
Me too, still to this day.I have used it ever since I first saw Aggasi use one
Me too, still to this day.
That’s what she said?Once you get a taste of a longer gun, you'll never go back.
I'll admit, I used it, and I would hit it maybe 2 out of 100 shots, (overheads) frustrated me so much I decided to not use a dampener on my 95.Have you tried no damp? That YY dampener is a feel rapist imo, lol. I don't think I could do it - would probably feel like the latest Pure strike to me.
Apologies -what does “BP” stand for?I completely agree. What follows is not directed at @Power Player ... as I said I agree with you.
Many on these boards complain of wanting Pro Stock racquets offered to retail customers (I amongst them). Well, here it is. Now, back up all the talk, step up, and try it. Then decide. Ask for lower SW offerings from the racquets available (if it's too much for you), or find a way to make it work. The only thing that is not Pro Stock about this racquet is that it is already 330g unstrung, so in some sense, it's good to go from the start without the need to mod it up.
I bought myself the BP 16x19 (308g, 313SW, 325mm balance (unstrung - from memory), and after mods... 343g, 324SW, 305mm balance (Unstrung)). It plays fantastic. It's stable, has an excellent sweet zone/spot, great control AND power, is excellent on offense and defense, and I can play with it for hours.
I don't see any problems here. Yonex has clearly laid it out for all of us. For those that complain about wanting Pro Stock specs and racquets... they gave us the 330g version, for those that want to create their own specs... the 310g, for those that want a tighter stringbed... the 97D, and for those that want a Gravity competitor but prefer Yonex... the 100 with a 63RA. It's all covered.
There is a full spectrum available. Pick the one that suits you and get on with it. Not all racquets are supposed to suit all people. I think it's great they are giving us a wide range to satisfy all levels and requirements.
Blade ProApologies -what does “BP” stand for?
Are you sure the one listed with higher twistweight isn’t the 2019 (green) one? I remember that that one had a slight bump up from the 2018 (blue) one.Looks like the twistweights may be up for the new VCore Pros - I may be wrong there, they have the 2018 310 listed at 13.49 and the new 310 is 13.81 If that is the case it should have a little more built in stability than the prior ones.
Are you sure the one listed with higher twistweight isn’t the 2019 (green) one? I remember that that one had a slight bump up from the 2018 (blue) one.
Apologies -what does “BP” stand for?