Sinner though as I said has been my favorite for a SF showdown with Daniil since the draw came out.
he might never get an easier road to a Slam SF. He’s looking ready to take the next step and the Tsitsipas QF is a perfect test to see if he’s for real.
he doesnt have the weapons. and when he tries weapons, he over hits or UE, has to keep redlining, and will get exhausted. You need easy power, big shots, at this level to win grand slams , either a serve, forehand , or a big backhand and he has neither.
he doesnt have the weapons. and when he tries weapons, he over hits or UE, has to keep redlining, and will get exhausted. You need easy power, big shots, at this level to win grand slams , either a serve, forehand , or a big backhand and he has neither.
will be solid top 20-25 player however. which is more than enough for a respectable career, could get to $3-5m net worth in endorsement potential in australia due to his clean image.
Sinner too good, he's actually grand slam material in a few years if he works on his game and the others retire/get old. Could win a few slams, and his game is tailor made for all surfaces.
As written before I liked the Minaur playbook against Sinner. Went for more but over three sets he fell out of the wrong side of the margin. Has to play much more on the edge then one of the biggest gun on tour. From both wings too.