2022 Italian Open ATP M1000 - Rome: May 8 - 15

Who triumphs in Rome?


  • Total voters
    38
  • Poll closed .
Not really excited about the Shapo - Ruud affair, so going to catch some sleep until Nole and FAA encounter starts..
 
Stop trolling.
You mean like this?
I see that self-awareness is not something you possess or even desire.
On a thread about Putintseva you wanted only to discuss me.

And on several other threads. Any time you find my name, you reply with a troll post i.e. non-tennis related and you want to discuss me instead of Djokovic, Nadal, Sampras...

Trust me, TTW isn't about me, as much as I tend to fascinate you...

TTW is about tennis.

Now if you can, answer why you believe Sinner isn't a home favourite in Rome?
 
Last edited:
You mean like this?

On a thread about Putintseva you wanted only to discuss me.

And on several other threads. Any time you find my name, you reply with a troll post i.e. non-tennis related and you want to discuss me instead of Djokovic, Nadal, Sampras...

Trust me, TTW isn't about me, as much as I tend to fascinate you...

TTW is about tennis.

Now if you can, answer why you believe Sinner isn't a home favourite in Rome?

Even though you only post background noise, it's still noise. Be quiet please.
 
Shapo - Nadal: exciting match
Shapo - Ruud: boring match
Could I conclude that I can’t find exciting any activity involving Ruud?
 
You may call them flaws but they are also what give him that special pop: he has unique, truly extreme mechanics on his groundstrokes and also on his serve, very complex and with almost no margin for error. So it's logical forhim to lose control more than most. Then, of course, there is the mental part.
The mental part may originate precisely on that.
His technique is complex and error prone, which causes him to be mentally insecure, as he can’t always rely on his consistency.
 
The mental part may originate precisely on that.
His technique is complex and error prone, which causes him to be mentally insecure, as he can’t always rely on his consistency.
So it might be a vicious cycle.

The technique leads to errors which makes him insecure, and the insecurity leads to executing the technique less well hence more errors.

OK, maybe not a cycle but a no-win situation.

Somebody joked he doesn't need to jump off the ground on every point. That's crazy too. I believe his tennis is geared to be spectacular but self-defeating in terms of big titles and major success.
 
Despite the scoreline indicating that the first set was exciting and tight, I derived very little enjoyment from watching it.

Two average returners.

Shapomugalov once again.
 
TB chronology:

0-0 Ruud: unret 1st serve
0-1 Shapovalov: DF (roflmao)
0-2 Shapovalov: unret 2nd serve (weak miss)
2-1 Ruud: unret 1st serve
3-1 Ruud: 1st serve, neutral rally ends with a kinda semi-unforced mishit BH by Ruud
2-3 Shapovalov: 1st serve s&v winner
3-3 Shapovalov: unret 1st serve
3-4 Ruud: 2nd serve, rally ends with Shaps netted FH
4-4 Ruud: unret 1st serve
4-5 Shapovalov: 1st serve+FH
5-5 Shapovalov: 2nd serve, rally ends with a FH inside-out winner by Shap
5-6 Ruud: unret 1st serve
6-6 Ruud: 1st serve, Ruud attacks and finishes at net eventually
6-7 Shapovalov: 2nd serve + strong DTL FH to force Ruud into error
7-7 Shapovalov: 1st serve, rally ends with a lucky dead netcord FH winner for Ruud
8-7 Ruud: unret 1st serve

Close stuff and Ruud got fortunate with the net cord but he was the better player thanks to getting more 1st serves in (7/8 in the TB, only 4/8 for Chapeau) so the result was logical.
 
Shapo return stats would lead one to believe he's playing Isner out there. It's too bad, because he's not playing terribly otherwise.
 
Back
Top