You weren’t alone but if you insist, here’s my take:
There is too much to lose by losing on purpose…a chance at 1000 points instead of settling for 360, a chance at €700K more in prize money AND an opportunity to avenge his three losses to Alcaraz on top of maintaining his winning consistency vs Zed on clay. I don’t think you considered that when you trolled that foundationless proposition, did you? Have you competed at world class level athletics? Do you personally know what it’s like to have pride in this type of competition? I’m thinking not if that trashy thought pattern exists inside your head.
But go ahead and be oversensitive when someone calls you out for insinuating there would be a stronger motivation to lose when there’s that much to gain.
I deal in logic maybe you should get back in touch with the concept.