It's intentional. If he simply kept his head down and then lost straight up he wouldn't have any excuses for the L.
Instead he creates a circus and then blames the circus for the loss.
It's all about protecting his own ego.
But is that a reason for a warning? Kyrgios threw the racquet, and then looked at Bernardes as if he was scared of a warning, which he didn't get for racquet abuse, but then gets for talking to the audience? It feels very strange to me. Given that it was the same umpire who gave him a point penalty in IW in a tie-break... you'd think it'd be different. At least it seamed that way when there wasn't a penalty for the racquet abuse; I thought Bernardes was trying to manage the situation and then it escalated like hell.Kyrgios was not happy with music, walkie-talkie sound from Bernardes (stupid mistake by the umpire). Then he (according to Bernardes) talked about him (Bernardes) with someone in the crowd.
Nick has a career in WWE if he ever wants it. He knows how to play with a crowd. lolThis is fun though right? That's why we watch Nick. And occasionally he absolutely blows the best players in the world off the court. But ultimately, it's all entertainment
Pro tennis players are not known for their exciting personalities last time I checkedHe's too predictable, so its not fun, because we've seen it all before. He has a one-dimensional personality.
Sinner is a man, while his opponent is a nancy boySinner is a pro. His face just says 'whatever.'
But most players have a full range of responses to situations, whereas Kyrgios only has one response - anger, so very predictable.Pro tennis players are not known for their exciting personalities last time I checked
e.bay.comWhy are spectators so happy when a player gives them a smashed racquet? What do they do with them?
Why are spectators so happy when a player gives them a smashed racquet? What do they do with them?
I’ve often thought that. I don’t want your rubbish would be my response.Why are spectators so happy when a player gives them a smashed racquet? What do they do with them?
Kyrgios is also very apathetic at times. He’s not always angryBut most players have a full range of responses to situations, whereas Kyrgios only has one response - anger, so very predictable.
Still have one hanging on a hookWhy are spectators so happy when a player gives them a smashed racquet? What do they do with them?
Whose was it?Still have one hanging on a hook
As Mayweather said, “I don’t care if you’re watching to see me lose, as long as you’re watching”Whatever Nick is doing it works. I'm only watching to see if he gets defaulted.
Had a poppin' fresh gripI’ve often thought that. I don’t want your rubbish would be my response.
He’s the biggest attraction in tennis besides the big 3. He’ll get all the WCs he wantsKyrgios doesn't deserve a WC ever.
Gentlemen, I know you’re against me, but please some respect.
what an idiot!
Sadly, me too.Whatever Nick is doing it works. I'm only watching to see if he gets defaulted.
He does the “you didn’t really beat me, I just didn’t care” act often when pushed by a non elite player. Fortunately, it counts all the same.Kyrgios is also very apathetic at times. He’s not always angry
Ex-partnerWhose was it?
I mean....Kyrgios doesn't deserve a WC ever.
Kyrgios is also very apathetic at times. He’s not always angry
I like your dog bro.I mean....
The purpose of WC is for tournaments to bring in players that the fans want to see.
... so unfortunately based on that Nick is going to get WC's whenever he wants.
ok... that's what i suspected when i checked the stats and saw 3-1 with a 0% BP conversion rate for both playersGame penalty now lol, what an arse
GuiltyWhatever Nick is doing it works. I'm only watching to see if he gets defaulted.
I'll let him know.I like your dog bro.
I'll let him know.
Can’t see the match, what’s going on?
It’s your standard Nick Kyrgios match, a beautiful mess.Can’t see the match, what’s going on?