That’s what folks pay good money for and wanna see. At this rate one will crash and burn by the third set if it makes it that far.Not sure how I feel about Draper PCB match so far. Points dragging on way too long.
Not sure how I feel about Draper PCB match so far. Points dragging on way too long.
How does a big guy like Draper not have a big forehand? Yikes, every time he hits it down the line, PCB just casually goes over there and returns it.
Long rallies where both guys are making more errors than winners.That’s what folks pay good money for and wanna see. At this rate one will crash and burn by the third set if it makes it that far.
Sometimes it be’s that way.Long rallies where both guys are making more errors than winners.
The good tennis as Nadal would call it I guess.
Pathetic Choke Boy strikes again with a UE and DF from 30-30. I’m barely watching this but it seems like Draper is going to be a top 25 player very very soon.
29 polls votes. 1 correct vote.
3.5%. That seems about right for TTW. You’d do better throwing darts than relying on TTW collective wisdom.
Lmao29 polls votes. 1 correct vote.
3.5%. That seems about right for TTW. You’d do better throwing darts than relying on TTW collective wisdom.
So this is the most Useless semifinals boring TV watch ever or what ??
Ah I meant I was being lazy and not looking up Rafas backhand to see if Toni is telling Felix to be more compact with his swing.It's not lazy. The kid works very hard, the problem is he is not working the right way, in my opinion.
A tournament directors dream semis:
PCB v Evans
Her Cats v Rude
Let’s go PCB!
A tournament directors dream semis:
PCB v Evans
Her Cats v Rude
Let’s go PCB!
The way PCB is playing right now, even Djokovic, Nadal or Zverev would've been in troubles if they'd played this tournament. This is the 2nd tournament in his life he shows this level of tennis (the 1st one was the Tokyo OG). Draper didn't even play a bad match today, but he was dismantled.
I have never been a fan of this player but if he wins the whole thing he will deserve it 100%. Fair is fair. And tbh I hope he wins it.
The way PCB is playing right now, even Djokovic, Nadal or Zverev would've been in troubles if they'd played this tournament. This is the 2nd tournament in his life he shows this level of tennis (the 1st one was the Tokyo OG). Draper didn't even play a bad match today, but he was dismantled.
I have never been a fan of this player but if he wins the whole thing he will deserve it 100%. Fair is fair. And tbh I hope he wins it.
And that's why Nadal and Djokovic owned him.Berd didn't need speed. He simply planted himself and opened the court up with his powerful blows.
Shapovalov ------ 100% no slam ----- the guy won one small title and he's 23 or st already, mindless bomber and a whiner, classic underachieverFully agree. Same with Shapovalov, Hurkacz, Berrettini, Rune, Dimitrov, Rublev, Khachanov....all of them super talented, they'll linger around the Top 50/30 for like....forever. But you just know they are never going to win a major.
The problem is, most people take "never win a slam" dead literally and that means if you have a cupcake draw like Medvedev did last year (with a completely gassed Djokovic in the final, which was a virtual non-contest), one of them could fluke a slam win. That's what I always worry will happen when we say X player will "never win a slam".Shapovalov ------ 100% no slam ----- the guy won one small title and he's 23 or st already, mindless bomber and a whiner, classic underachiever
Hurkacz --------- he might actually do it, because he is more clutch than the others, Wimbledon for example
Berrettini -------- he keeps showing very good consistency but he doesn't have that slam vibe, seems like someone who'd lose a close final
Rune ------------ I can't predict this kid, he is a nutcase, probably will win a slam just because his generation is so bad
Dimitrov -------- of course not, I never considered him a potential slam winner, he was the same case as FAA, too scared of winning, improved but not enough
Rublev ---------- one-dimensional basher, just like Ferrer he has a certain ceiling and that ceiling is below slams, plus he's non-clutch at slams
Khachanov ------ powerful but not brilliant, never struck me as slam material
There are numerous players who went far often in slams yet never won one.There's "slam aura" and then there's just "I think he has the skills to possibly take advantage of the right draw and nab a Slam." I thought FAA might be the latter - never destined to win, no concrete aura, but possible. Especially after his decent run at Slams from Wimbledon 2021 to AO 2022. Now I'm less sure.
Where is the evidence of the "no"?Yes...but also no.
The problem is, most people take "never win a slam" dead literally and that means if you have a cupcake draw like Medvedev did last year (with a completely gassed Djokovic in the final, which was a virtual non-contest), one of them could fluke a slam win. That's what I always worry will happen when we say X player will "never win a slam".
You argument has an extreme flaw: Medvedev already had two runs into slam finals - and followed his slam triumph with another run at AO.The problem is, most people take "never win a slam" dead literally and that means if you have a cupcake draw like Medvedev did last year (with a completely gassed Djokovic in the final, which was a virtual non-contest), one of them could fluke a slam win. That's what I always worry will happen when we say X player will "never win a slam".
Shapovalov ------ 100% no slam ----- the guy won one small title and he's 23 or st already, mindless bomber and a whiner, classic underachiever
Hurkacz --------- he might actually do it, because he is more clutch than the others, Wimbledon for example
Berrettini -------- he keeps showing very good consistency but he doesn't have that slam vibe, seems like someone who'd lose a close final
Rune ------------ I can't predict this kid, he is a nutcase, probably will win a slam just because his generation is so bad
Dimitrov -------- of course not, I never considered him a potential slam winner, he was the same case as FAA, too scared of winning, improved but not enough
Rublev ---------- one-dimensional basher, just like Ferrer he has a certain ceiling and that ceiling is below slams, plus he's non-clutch at slams
Khachanov ------ powerful but not brilliant, never struck me as slam material
Shapo can lose 7 straight matches better than winning them.Dimitrov might be a case of age but broken draws are going to be commonplace so considering Isner, Anderson, Agut, Querrey, Berdych making Slam Semis in their 30s I'd say Dimitrov can absolutely luck out. On the other side with Shapovalov, he's still got his prime years left with a higher ceiling. Of course it's about winning 7 matches in a row but in both Shap & Grigor's case the Covid seasons did them no favors.
I remain hopefully especially of Shap but let's see.
As some have said, somebody has to win these Slams from 2025-2030 even if they're not legends of years passed.