The Green Mile
Bionic Poster
What a fun point lol
Ominous form. I’m about to go strong rulingDjokovic playing great. Clean striking, focused... Looking much better than in the first round..
He used to do so consistently obviously. Although I like seeing Novak continue to play decent tennis and win at this stage, the problem with dominating at the end of your career with a slightly lower level of play that doesn't really resemble your prime form is that that's the way that people then remember you (unlike a guy like Safin for example who had a really brief peak and is remembered as this mythical beast with unmatched level of play at his best). It's really unfortunate that people honestly think of a guy that beat BOAT level players in Fedal many times playing an extremely proactive brand of tennis as some type of pusher. Obviously part of that is intellectual dishonesty from Fedal fans trying to push a narrative but there are people who genuinely believe that also.Novak has actually been enjoyable to watch today. No seriously, he has. Coming to net quite a bit, hitting angled FHs, nice passing shots, throwing in lots of droppers and short slices
If only he played like this all of the time
Novak has Kokkinakis on a string and has embarrassed him many times with all sorts of shots and points. It's like watching Fed play with some of his opponents at times.
Totally agreed.He used to do so consistently obviously. Although I like seeing Novak continue to play decent tennis and win at this stage, the problem with dominating at the end of your career with a lower level of play that doesn't really resemble your prime form is that that's the way that people then remember you (unlike a guy like Safin who had a really brief peak and is remembered as this mythical beast with unmatched level of play at his best). It's really unfortunate that people honestly think of a guy that beat BOAT level players in Fedal many times playing an extremely proactive brand of tennis tennis as a pusher.
Novak is not a pusher but he wins a lot of points by doing exactly that- pushing. That doesn't mean he can't play more aggressive, he just chooses not to.Totally agreed.
I do think that, aside from some high profile matches where he was not aggressive enough, the idea of Novak as pusher is one of the most obvious tells that the person you're speaking to doesn't really understand tennis. And that's OK, people see what they want to see.
That's pretty generous given Nadal's performances at Wimbledon.I'm not usually one for early winner predictions, but who seriously beats Novak here? I give Rafa about a 25% chance.
He is striking the ball just beautifully, isn't it!?Clinical by Novak. Showing why he won 6 Wimbledon titles and is favorite for the 7th.
We know you're his no 1 fan.Clinical by Novak. Showing why he won 6 Wimbledon titles and is favorite for the 7th.
Grassovic is so much more fun to watch than Clayovic these days when he's feeling it. Shame he played so nervous (or whatever the reason was) last year because I really enjoy watching him when he's playing like this. I just hope he keeps it up.
In fairness his opponent is hopeless, so it’s not hard.This is top level tennis by Novak... Clinical...
Not really. Not at all.We know you're his no 1 fan.
True. You can see why Djokovic has won this thing so many times by watching this match.
Yes, but mostly because Djokovic is this good...In fairness his opponent is hopeless, so it’s not hard.
We all can definitely see why Djokovic has won this thing so many times.
He’s much better than the clay season but he was doing pretty well before QF at RG. Diego maybe had a hand in that given that his form has been very low this year.Grassovic is so much more fun to watch than Clayovic these days when he's feeling it. Shame he played so nervous (or whatever the reason was) last year because I really enjoy watching him when he's playing like this. I just hope he keeps it up.
What should we call Federer's movement on this surface if Djokovic's is extraordinary?Djokovic's movement on this surface is just extraordinary.
Federer clearly better.Does Novak move better on grass than Fed? I know it's crazy to think. Fed is a better grasscourt player vs Novak because of better serve and net play.
However, just from the baseline and movement at the back, I've NEVER seen anyone move like Novak does on grass.
Novak is sauntering out there like it's clay. Even Nadal on grass doesn't move as fluidly.
Fed's is more gracious, Djokovic's slightly more effective. Overall in the same tier, for sure.What should we call Federer's movement on this surface if Djokovic's is extraordinary?
Not in my opinion. Fed is MORE offensive, better serve, better net play etc.Federer clearly better.
Does Novak move better on grass than Fed? I know it's crazy to think.
This is not a bad point imo. He chooses to play conservatively (that has been the case since 2011 anyway) if he doesn't need to be aggressive (it totally depends on the type of opponent he's playing). But he hits with greater depth and with more pace (while being in that pusher mode) than your regular pusher on Tour, and is a great ball-striker whose technique rarely breaks and all that makes him extremely difficult to handle.Novak is not a pusher but he wins a lot of points by doing exactly that- pushing. That doesn't mean he can't play more aggressive, he just chooses not to.
I think I will wait to see him play an opponent with a ranking above 80 something who has a game to offer on grass. In ten years Kokkinakis has rarely got past qualies at any slam and rarely manages an appearance at a Masters, in all of which he loses and only occasionally manages to win a single match. There is a huge gulf between them in terms of ability.Yes, but mostly because Djokovic is this good...
You're the one who said Djokovic's serve is as good as Sampras, aren't you? LolNot in my opinion. Fed is MORE offensive, better serve, better net play etc.
However movement from the back laterally and forwards/backwards - Novak is moving better than Fed IMO.
Hell, better than anyone on grass. Even Pete and Borg.
Sure Pete and Fed had bigger weapons than Novak - but pure baseline strength on grass and movement - Novak has to be the best.
No.Does Novak move better on grass than Fed? I know it's crazy to think. Fed is a better grasscourt player vs Novak because of better serve and net play.
However, just from the baseline and movement at the back, I've NEVER seen anyone move like Novak does on grass.
Novak is sauntering out there like it's clay. Even Nadal on grass doesn't move as fluidly.
You're spitting facts today TennisFan3.Not in my opinion. Fed is MORE offensive, better serve, better net play etc.
However movement from the back laterally and forwards/backwards - Novak is moving better than Fed IMO.
Hell, better than anyone on grass. Even Pete and Borg.
Sure Pete and Fed had bigger weapons than Novak - but pure baseline strength on grass and movement - Novak has to be the best.
Does Novak move better on grass than Fed? I know it's crazy to think. Fed is a better grasscourt player vs Novak because of better serve and net play.
However, just from the baseline and movement at the back, I've NEVER seen anyone move like Novak does on grass.
Novak is sauntering out there like it's clay. Even Nadal on grass doesn't move as fluidly.
The most complicated draw of all time!Kecmanovic, Opelka could snatch a set, Carlos is a little bit of an enigma on the grass still and can getter better as the tournament progresses (battle with Otte could be interesting though), and I think it's gonna be either Norrie or Tiafoe in the SF.