No doubt. I am just impressed by the level Djokovic is showing here, no matter the opponent...I think I will wait to see him play an opponent with a ranking above 80 something who has a game to offer on grass. In ten years Kokkinakis has rarely got past qualies at any slam and rarely manages an appearance at a Masters, in all of which he loses and only occasionally manages to win a single match. There is a huge gulf between them in terms of ability.
r u serious?That's pretty generous given Nadal's performances at Wimbledon.
The current Novak is far better than 2018 Wimbledon Novak. The serve is far better for one and so is the net play.
LolPoor Alcaraz might not get his match done today. R2 late match on court 2 at the mercy of weather and light. Might have to play consecutive days, disastrous for the Spaniard.
Federer footwork was better for sure, but pure speed wise I think Djokovic is slightly better. Remember Federer was having problem running to his forehand side almost throughout his whole career.Federer is the smoothest mover on the grass though. We have to give him that. His footwork is sublime. Djokovic is extremely fluid and limber, and just gets to everything but footwork is not as good. Two different types of movement but equally effective.
I know man. Fed's explosiveness is a sight to watch. Much more entertaining.Federer's movement at his peak was feather-light though. And his first step was devastatingly explosive.
Na pivo?Idemo.
Sa @TripleATeam.Na pivo?
That was a joke Sir. It was clearly meant to be seen that way.You're the one who said Djokovic's serve is as good as Sampras, aren't you? Lol
Federer footwork was better for sure, but pure speed wise I think Djokovic is slightly better. Remember Federer was having problem running to his forehand side almost throughout his whole career.![]()
I remember very well that many were saying that when he won against Kevin Anderson at Wimbledon. It was early in the tournament, 2nd or 3rd I think.That was a joke Sir. It was clearly meant to be seen that way.
I said the opponents were making Novak look like he was serving like Sampras.
No one in their right mind would say Novak's serve is as good as Sampras. It isn't even close to as good as Fed's.
Iznenadićete se kad vidite da sam stara žena.
I know man. Fed's explosiveness is a sight to watch. Much more entertaining.
But just in terms of effectiveness, Novak defends like a gazelle on grass.
The dude is effortlessly reaching balls and sliding like clay. Just stretching and effortlessly going from defense to offense.
With Fed you could attack his backhand and push him back. What do you do with Novak?
Ja sam mlada žena i lepo su me prihvatili, tako da opušteno.Iznenadićete se kad vidite da sam stara žena.
The Kokk suffered a premature withdrawal.Kokkinakis bending over at the net to give Novak MP is the perfect summation of this match.
As someone who couldn’t stand Fed, I was always in awe of his footwork. Just light and effortless.You are over-exaggerating Djokovic's movement compared to ponytail, 05/06/07 Federer IMO.
Offensive Movement wise, Peak Fed is much ahead IMO.
Djokovic's other strengths like Backhand Aggression , never conceding the central position due to unbearable depth and Return of Serve are up there with anyone's weapons.
But still , footwork and Movement especially belong to peak Fed. His footwork was so light at times that it felt he was barely running, almost walking on the grass.
Brutal level from the Earth's Mightiest Warrior.![]()
Exactly man this is how information works.
Novak plays bad - I say he played bad, worried about his form
Novak plays better - I give him credit for playing well and like his chances
Nadal plays bad - I say he played bad, worried about his form
Nadal will have to play better to get credit from me.
I know that's just reactionary. Bottom line is Novak is NOT an elite Top tier server. Nowhere near Sampras. Not even as good as Fed.I remember very well that many were saying that when he won against Kevin Anderson at Wimbledon. It was early in the tournament, 2nd or 3rd I think.
It was good that Joker took on the Kokk so prematurely.As someone who couldn’t stand Fed, I was always in awe of his footwork. Just light and effortless.
On topic, good win for Novak. Much better today.
Zezam se, ali sjajno. U ponedeljak ćemo se pravo svi upoznati. Jednu star da ćete morati oprostiti je moj naglasak, jer živeo sam 20 godina u Americi.Ja sam mlada žena i lepo su me prihvatili, tako da opušteno.
Kad su oprostili meni niški naglasak, oprostiće i tebi američki. Samo opuštenoZezam se, ali sjajno. U ponedeljak ćemo se pravo svi upoznati. Jednu star da ćete morati oprostiti je moj naglasak, jer živeo sam 20 godina u Americi.
Upoznaćeš i @GoldenMasters. Nije nešto aktivan.Zezam se, ali sjajno. U ponedeljak ćemo se pravo svi upoznati. Jednu star da ćete morati oprostiti je moj naglasak, jer živeo sam 20 godina u Americi.
Neah, Fed is more effective. The footwork makes a huge difference because Fed is quite fast in terms of footspeed too.Federer is the smoothest mover on the grass though. We have to give him that. His footwork is sublime. Djokovic is extremely fluid and limber, and just gets to everything but footwork is not as good. Two different types of movement but equally effective.
Neah, Fed is more effective. The footwork makes a huge difference because Fed is quite fast in terms of footspeed too.
2006-2008 Ned is also a better grass mover. That explains why he peaked so early here even though he is a claycourter.
Calling him "a claycourter" at this point is sacrilege.Neah, Fed is more effective. The footwork makes a huge difference because Fed is quite fast in terms of footspeed too.
2006-2008 Ned is also a better grass mover. That explains why he peaked so early here even though he is a claycourter.
Well I am talking about prime-peak anyway.I don't know about more effective but definitely smoother and lighter on his feet. Different. I don't think Federer or Nadal maintained a top level of speed as long as Djokovic has either. That's where he's the clear winner. As for who was faster at their peaks, we're threading the needle. The difference is pretty small and can be argued in any direction.
This was about 2006-2008, my badCalling him "a claycourter" at this point is sacrilege.
![]()
Well I am talking about prime-peak anyway.
Novak is definitely the fastest of the 3 in his old age, yet Fed could move and defend quite impressively even at near 38 during Wimby 19.
Nadal's footwork was way off during that 2012-2014 stretch, even if his speed wasn't bad otherwise and it made a huge difference.
Clay and grass reward great footwork more than HCs imo
Oh, did the match already happen? Just checked in the scores.
Yep it's over. Djokovic looked great today.
Grass definitely rewards precise movement over sliding.All 3 are different but in the comparison with Federer and Djokovic, it's hard for me to say Federer was a more effective mover. I think Federer is a better grass court player but movement wise I think they are equally effective. Federer has the best footwork and able to take those small steps to get to more shots than most other players and still be able to remain offensive, but then Djokovic will slide on grass and have enough balance to hit an aggressive shot when other players wouldn't dare try that.
I think you can actually be kind of sloppy on clay with your footwork but you need good balance and be able to master the slide. On grass, mastering the movement is harder. It's easiest to move on hardcourt though, so I totally agree on that.
As a whole, please compare the level from Monday to today, on a scale of 1 to 10. 10 being Djokovic in God mode.
Monday - 4
Today - 8.5
He was probably close to a 9 today honestly.
Grass definitely rewards precise movement over sliding.
Generally speaking Fed relies on balance and anticipation, Novak on flexibility and great reach and Nadal on raw footspeed and explosive footwork.
First is clearly best for grass, 2nd for HCs and 3rd for clay. It's quite fitting to why each have a specific best surface
Backhand was sick today. Forehand penetrating power, that was completely non-existent in the 1st round, was there. Serve was good. Didn't hit many aces because Kokk got a racket on so many. Return and movement were great. Net play was also great. Solid 8.5-8.7.Whoa....
Monday - 4
Today - 8.5
He was probably close to a 9 today honestly.
Agreed with the caveat that this is a 8.5 and close to as well as 35 yr old Djokovic can play.Backhand was sick today. Forehand penetrating power, that was completely non-existent in the 1st round, was there. Serve was good. Didn't hit many aces because Kokk got a racket on so many. Return and movement were great. Net play was also great. Solid 8.5-8.7.