OldManStan
Rookie
I fear that Nadal will withdraw due to injury.
Couldn't have said it better!Nick takes the first set, Nadal's arm falls off so he takes a break. Nick fights with his box and blows it in 5
Nadal has already surpassed Fed. I don’t get the point of rooting against Nadal if you’re a Fed fan anymore.
Fixed.@threehandedbackhand please add 'Nadal withdraws' in the poll. That's the most likely outcome atm.
Saw extended highlights and Nadal looks like he will be fine for the semis. No way, he doesn't play. Think he wins in 4.
Yeah, the issue is that Federer had to cope with the absolute peak version of both, or semi declined versions. Current Nadal and current Djokovic are feasting in an absolute wasteland of a weak era, where the only two players who dared to defy both (Thiem and Medviedev) got injured in the process.Dude, that's not healthy.
I'm not a fan of Djokodal and I can be as salty as they come, but I never once proclaimed such a strong hate for either of them.
Nadal didn't sound too upbeat in the presser
frigging sore losersDamn… but lol at all the betting losers
I like Nadal and am rooting for him. But can also say as a Federer fan that Nadal has absolutely not in any way, shape, or form passed fed.
22 > 20. That's one way he passed him lol
There are definitely other ways that he hasn't passed him but there is at least one way he passed him.
It'd be wise for Rafa to withdraw from the semifinal and send Nick into the final.Nadal didn’t sound like he would play. Kyrgios is getting a bye most likely.
When has Nadal not been injured?These two are so unpredictable right now. Kyrgios is very inconsistent; especially when he tanks service games. Tanking anything against Nadal is a big mistake. Nadal is now injured, which makes his level of play questionable. I don't even know how to call this one.
Nadal in 5. But anything could happen here, including a Nadal withdrawal.
I don’t view things like that at all. 14 of them are on clay. FOURTEEN.
Nadal has already surpassed Fed. I don’t get the point of rooting against Nadal if you’re a Fed fan anymore.
It’s got worse, so it’s obviously something they need to know definitively whether continuing to play will cause more problems long term or not. Not rocket science.Here we go with the scan. I am sure they knew if he was taped up all this time what he had.
I'd LMAO if he does and defeats Djo in the finalIt’s going to be a ****show here on TTW when Kyrgios gets through to the final
Why is clay so bad? Why are clay titles always seen as denouncement for Nadal while bunch of HC titles are not seen the same way for Fedovic?I don’t view things like that at all. 14 of them are on clay. FOURTEEN.
Clay is a surface and was around before HC. It's a more legitimate surface as tennis was started on grass, another natural surface.I don’t view things like that at all. 14 of them are on clay. FOURTEEN.
There are 2 slams with hard. So Novak/Fed have an advantage excelling in that surface.Clay is a surface and was around before HC. It's a more legitimate surface as tennis was started on grass, another natural surface.
Federer never won one injured.He also missed like 10 slams with them? lol
What if they never changed from grass for all the slams???There are 2 slams with hard. So Novak/Fed have an advantage excelling in that surface.
There's only 1 slam on clay, so Nadal starts with a handicap.
Still he has MOST slams. What if there were 2 clay slams, instead of 2 Hardcourt slams?
Big mistake. This Argy prefers Nadal 100%.No es casualidad que los argentinos odien tanto a Nadal, incluso prefieren al payaso de Djokovic.
![]()
You bet your house on it?Nadal didn’t sound like he would play. Kyrgios is getting a bye most likely.
No es así en foros de habla hispana como punto de break, donde muchos de tus compatriotas prefieren el serbio.Big mistake. This Argy prefers Nadal 100%.
But uses sarcasm with everybody, as they inspire me much.
Calm down, please. There are lots of other players that provide a more fulfilling hatred experience.I f-ing hate Nadal, I hate him since 2007.
What part of I Ha-Te Na-Dal don't you understand?
Cada uno tiene la libre elección de gustarle el jugador que quiera. Soy chileno y soy hincha a muerte de Roger, y no me gusta Garín que es chileno.No es así en foros de habla hispana como punto de break, donde muchos de tus compatriotas prefieren el serbio.
![]()
I don't know your favourite team in Argentina, but I'm a Universidad de Chile fan, and I'd never want Colo Colo or U Católica to win titles.Calm down, please. There are lots of other players that provide a more fulfilling hatred experience.
Then you should be unhappy most of the time lolI f-ing hate Nadal, I hate him since 2007.
What part of I Ha-Te Na-Dal don't you understand?
True. I'm curious about that one. Nadal would have adapted and maybe Fed would have most slams.What if they never changed from grass for all the slams???
Porque me gusta hablar más de un idioma.Cada uno tiene la libre elección de gustarle el jugador que quiera. Soy chileno y soy hincha a muerte de Roger, y no me gusta Garín que es chileno.
And why you're speaking in Spanish in this forum, BTW?
Why is clay so bad? Why are clay titles always seen as denouncement for Nadal while bunch of HC titles are not seen the same way for Fedovic?
He passed him on the most important metric. That’s what matters the most.22 > 20. That's one way he passed him lol
There are definitely other ways that he hasn't passed him but there is at least one way he passed him.
True. But there's still dominance of HC in slams, so any one good on HC will have more slams.It’s not bad. I was just implying that Federer was the more dominant player on TWO surfaces, whereas Nadal was dominant on mainly one.
Federer never won one injured.
He passed him on the most important metric. That’s what matters the most.
That one.Not sure what point you're trying to make lol
So if an injured Nadal can win slams but an injured Federer can't, what is your point?