2023 Miami Open ATP Masters 1000 Quarter final :- Carlos Alcaraz Garfia (Spain) [1] versus Taylor Harry Fritz (United States of America) [9]

win prediction poll


  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Hypersonic speed like we've never seen on a tennis court - shots that would be clean winners against anyone else, and he's there in a flash, perfectly planted on his feet, smacking it back even harder than it got there.

Inhuman strength and power throughout his upper and lower body, supernatural reflexes, lightning-quick injury recovery time.

6 foot tall and easily serving 140 mph bombs, at 19.

Fresh as a daisy and faster than ever after 4 or 5 hours at max intensity.

Nothing to see here, folks!
 
Sorry but the running from one side of the court over and over and over reminds me so much of young Rafa.
 
yes but we all know that doesn't translate to him having the highest potential peak (although he could, but we don't know that).

Nadal peaked much earlier than Fed but Fed still had the much higher peak on anything other than clay
Sure injuries can derail achievements for great talented players.

Fed was the second best FO clay court player losing only to Nadal.
5 finals!!! - 4x runner up and 1-time winner over Soderling.
Let's stop underplaying Fed's greatness on clay.

Djokovic - 6 finals; 4 runner-ups and 2 wins is the 2nd best now by a close margin.
 
Last edited:
Hypersonic speed like we've never seen on a tennis court - shots that would be clean winners against anyone else, and he's there in a flash, perfectly planted on his feet, smacking it back even harder than it got there.

Inhuman strength and power throughout his upper and lower body, supernatural reflexes, lightning-quick injury recovery time.

6 foot tall and easily serving 140 mph bombs, at 19.

Fresh as a daisy and faster than ever after 4 or 5 hours at max intensity.

Nothing to see here, folks!
Yeah he also must be taking some pills for those drop shots and tennis IQ
 
I have a feeling the big 2 would get bagelled and breadsticked by the current Alcaraz in the upcoming matches they will have in the future.
Alcaraz is on fire right now, but there's no chance he bagels current Djokovic. That serve & return combo is still way too strong to get broken more than twice in a single set.

Nadal we have no idea about though. We don't know what kind of shape he's in.
 
But why did you even expect it? Carlos is in a completely different dimension from Fritz. Taylor actually played well tonight, but he's not in the league of Carlos.
I agree, Taylor played a good game, it's just that the opponent was far better.

Taylor is one of my favorite player, I watch lots of his matches, and today he was playing good, and a lot of times
was playing all or nothing, because with top players you have to raise your level.
Trouble is that Taylor is not good enough.

Taylor is top 10, whereas Alcaraz is #1, we have to face the facts.
 
Hypersonic speed like we've never seen on a tennis court - shots that would be clean winners against anyone else, and he's there in a flash, perfectly planted on his feet, smacking it back even harder than it got there.

Inhuman strength and power throughout his upper and lower body, supernatural reflexes, lightning-quick injury recovery time.

6 foot tall and easily serving 140 mph bombs, at 19.

Fresh as a daisy and faster than ever after 4 or 5 hours at max intensity.

Nothing to see here, folks!
Yes, and don't forget his nipples, that drive you nuts, right?
 
Yeah he also must be taking some pills for those drop shots and tennis IQ
I haven't seen some level of "tennis IQ" that stands out compared to other highly ranked players. And as much as that is a real thing, it's still not the most complicated sport in terms of tactics. The guy is super fit and not afraid to go for crazy shots (which he seems to be hitting more often than not lately). Let's not make it into something more than it is.

Alcaraz is on fire right now, but there's no chance he bagels current Djokovic. That serve & return combo is still way too strong to get broken more than twice in a single set.

Nadal we have no idea about though. We don't know what kind of shape he's in.
It's almost like people forget that a hobbled Nadal beat an in-form Alcaraz at Indian Wells, just last year.
 
Last edited:
I haven't seen some level of "tennis IQ" that stands out compared to other highly ranked players. And as much as that is a real thing, it's still not the most complicated sport in terms of tactics. The gun is super fit and not afraid to go for crazy shots (which he seems to be hitting more often than not lately). Let's not make it into something more than it is.


It's almost like people forget that a hobbled Nadal beat an in-form Alcaraz at Indian Wells just last year.
If you think that then im sorry but you dont know a lot about tennis, tennis iq is about the intelligence and quickness making decisions depending where you stand on the court, if you think alcaraz is just power, then you aint got a clue
 
LOL what can I say... I'm an idealist and long for a clean and honest world. Certain signs are so obvious to anyone who knows their sht, but most people have no interest in seeing them. And I guess THAT is what really drives me nuts... the suspension of disbelief.
Did you watch the kid at 15? I did, he played just the same, and was beating 30 years old at challengers, was he under heavy doping then?
 
LOL what can I say... I'm an idealist and long for a clean and honest world. Certain signs are so obvious to anyone who knows their sht, but most people have no interest in seeing them. And I guess THAT is what really drives me nuts... the suspension of disbelief.
What is obvious is that you don't know anything at all about that murky business.

If you knew something, you'd know that nobody under 22 yo would take the staff you are insinuating.. because that produces
stunt growth, doctors can give him or anyone under 22 other things but not what you are insinuating.

When you say that kind of things, you come across like an ignoramus, and only other ignoramus like you will agree.

Do yourself a favor, do some research before posting that kind of accusations.
 
Remember that Sinner hasn't won a single masters 1000, nor a slam, and let alone being #1.

The comparison is not good, you can do better than that.
Honestly, some of these ridiculous comments are the reason why there is push back on Alcaraz.

Maybe you didn't notice that Sinner beat Alcaraz twice last year, including at win at Wimbledon? Maybe you forgot that their epic USO match was super tight, and easily could have gone the other way?
If you think that then im sorry but you dont know a lot about tennis, tennis iq is about the intelligence and quickness making decisions depending where you stand on the court, if you think alcaraz is just power, then you aint got a clue
Yeah, he gets into a position where there is a tiny window for a potentially amazing shot, and he goes for it. Everybody sees that. But some people don't think that makes him some sort of genius, he's just got guts and the skills to frequently pull it off.

A lot of the other "amazing" points he plays involve amazing gets. He's great at chasing balls down. But that doesn't take brains either. My dog is REALLY good at chasing balls down.
 
Honestly, some of these ridiculous comments are the reason why there is push back on Alcaraz.

Maybe you didn't notice that Sinner beat Alcaraz twice last year, including at win at Wimbledon? Maybe you forgot that their epic USO match was super tight, and easily could have gone the other way?

Yeah, he gets into a position where there is a tiny window for a potentially amazing shot, and he goes for it. Everybody sees that. But some people don't think that makes him some sort of genius, he's just got guts and the skills to frequently pull it off.

A lot of the other "amazing" points he plays involve amazing gets. He's great at chasing balls down. But that doesn't take brains either. My dog is REALLY good at chasing balls down.
Its not about brains, its about intuition, do you play tennis man?? I would say you dont play a lot
 
Back
Top