Rozroz
G.O.A.T.
still he would have done exactly the sameCarlos had to say that, he is just trying to be a good sportsman
still he would have done exactly the sameCarlos had to say that, he is just trying to be a good sportsman
It’s weird. I think he’s on something.Once again Alcaraz's fitness lets him down. For a 20 year old who should be at the height of his fitness to lose that particular battle to a guy 16 years his senior is worrying. It's the 1 big question mark I have over his future career!!!
Does anyone else wonder if Carlos is taking something that caused this? I have never seen a player get debilitating full body cramps after 2 sets of tennis. That’s in 50 years of watching tennis.
My guess would be diuretics to flush banned substances out of his system quicker before drug tests.Is he taking diuretics to mask the use of other banned substances? Why cramp twice in two different tough matches within 3 months after two sets when he is a fit 20-year old.
6 Medications That Cause Leg Cramps
May 09, 2024 - If you’re worried about medications that cause leg cramps, this article focuses on six common medication-related causes.www.bassmedicalgroup.com
What does Dr. Cotorro have to say?
Except Carlos was done after 2 sets, didn’t get a chance to get worn out. I don’t think Novak had much to do with this particular incident. It’s something going on with Carlos’ body.Rope-a-dope Ali vs Foreman.........exactly.
I agree. The problem is something going on inside Carlos’ body that made him full body cramp. He was not fatigued. I suspect he is taking something that caused it. Legal/illegal I don’t know.It's amusing hearing commentators say that Djokovic caused the cramps. As if this is fantasy game where you can cast a "induce cramps" power
Don't get me wrong Djokovic was doing a great job moving Alcaraz around, but Alcaraz has played 5 setters like that before.
Well when you cramp, it comes from a lack of conditioning.....no ?Except Carlos was done after 2 sets, didn’t get a chance to get worn out. I don’t think Novak had much to do with this particular incident. It’s something going on with Carlos’ body.
The man has turned this sport to a science.I did note during the rallies that Djokovic’s technique on groundstrokes seems just so solid and reliable. Unbreakable. He would really lean into his shots to add power without needing the crazy racquet head speed that Alcaraz goes for on his forehand — which seems more volatile and prone to breaking down in extended rallies.
In some sense it was a victory for the old methods as well as the older player.
Note Alcaraz has a tinier frame at only 5'10.5. that is small for a tennis athlete in modern standards. Djokovic is 6'2, taller and fitter than federer, and has an even more relaxed playing style.I did note during the rallies that Djokovic’s technique on groundstrokes seems just so solid and reliable. Unbreakable. He would really lean into his shots to add power without needing the crazy racquet head speed that Alcaraz goes for on his forehand — which seems more volatile and prone to breaking down in extended rallies.
In some sense it was a victory for the old methods as well as the older player.
I had it once during a tennis match on an extremely hot day, hands, legs and finally everything cramped, it wad a terrifying experience, Carlitos wasn‘t near that, because at sone point you just fall on a ground and wail. And I‘m a man in his late 40s not particularly in a good physical condition. On the other hand, I was told it‘s not only nutrition and conditions that causes that, it‘s also mental. I‘m as sure the whole hype and Ferrero‘s expectations played their role too.Does anyone else wonder if Carlos is taking something that caused this? I have never seen a player get debilitating full body cramps after 2 sets of tennis. That’s in 50 years of watching tennis.
Boxers of his generation they all are cramping big time…Djokovic knows the time-tested rule: you fight a boxer, and box a fighter. Alcaraz got an important lesson today. He is a fantastically gifted fighter, but to fulfill his potential he’s going to have to learn to outsmart maybe the best boxer ever to play the game. And the boxers of his own generation (e.g., Rune).
STFU, man. Always going on about Alcaraz's supposed doping. You are Italian. Enough said.Alcaraz has claimed that his "amazing physical transformation" was made possible by carbohydrates. These two big, long, juicy baguettes should be right up his alley.
Cramporaz ->advantage Djoker. Match over.
- Slow clay -> advantage Raz
- Heavy balls this edition -> advantage Raz
- Peaking Alcaraz -> advantage Raz
- Off form Djokovic -> advantage Raz
- 16 years age gap -> advantage Raz
- Day conditions = Heatstrokovic -> advantage Raz
I expect two routine sets for Alcaraz and another close one.
Djokovic would need to start bashing the ball, play like he has nothing to lose and pray for the best just to win a set but that's all he can hope for in my opinion.
Karl in 3. It could be in 4 only if Djokovic goes nuclear for one set.
I'll be watching but sadly I don't see how this can be a close one.
Wasn’t crampingDoes anyone else wonder if Carlos is taking something that caused this? I have never seen a player get debilitating full body cramps after 2 sets of tennis. That’s in 50 years of watching tennis.
I know 06 was a while ago but you were definitely around and watching when it struck.No changing of the guard for at least another year. Worst era of all time with Wimbledone coming right now.
The Novak Derangement Syndrome is a sight to see. Right up there with Trump Derangement Syndrome!
2 GOATs hated by small minded individuals who, angry at their own life failures, attempt to tear down high achieving alpha males.
STAY MAD.
Djoker would have won with or without the typical PED induced injuries all the Spaniards seem to have.
Cramp in the arm?Well when you cramp, it comes from a lack of conditioning.....no ?
Carlos thought he would dig himself out of it with shot wizardry.
His "super coach" Ferrero, has a lot to answer for here imho.
And leg...Cramp in the arm?
Yep always projection from dopes like him.STFU, man. Always going on about Alcaraz's supposed doping. You are Italian. Enough said.
Italian athletes responsible for most anti-doping rule violations
Italian athletes were responsible for comfortably the most confirmed anti-doping rule violations in 2017, according to new statistics made public by t...www.insidethegames.biz
Italians top WADA’s Prohibited Association List - Sports Integrity Initiative
One hundred and sixty one people from 30 countries feature on the latest version of the Prohibited Association List, published by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) on 10 April. The List, which is updated on 10 January, 10 April, 10 July and 10 October each year, features the names of Athlete...www.sportsintegrityinitiative.com
Says the player that celebrates every point like he won Wimbledon, fist pumps, grunts at the loudest volumes and yells VAMOS at the top of his lungs. This is the most absurd argument I have ever heard. Nobody celebrates more than Carlos. Its the main reason I cant stand watching him...most players wait for a big moment (like Novak). He does it on every point...absolutely disgusting behavior by novak in this final. No wonder eveyrone hates him. and this is why he will never be loved as one of the greates
"Everyone hates him". Its fun watching his success make you so uncomfortable. You see tennis as a popularity contest. "And the award for the most elegant is...." Last time I checked, the classiest player doesnt get any extra points for their Emily Post perfect posture and matching Laura Ashley outfit. The most popular player doesnt get to hit against a lower net or without any sun in their eyes. The better player is decided on the court. Anything else is just white noise. It is also fodder for those that can not accept the results on the court. The only way for some to try and win is to tear down the accomplishments of others with words in an attempt to change the narrative. "Oh, it doesnt matter if he wins 100 Slams...he is still a jerk". Sadly for you, its the other way around.absolutely disgusting behavior by novak in this final. No wonder eveyrone hates him. and this is why he will never be loved as one of the greates
Sorry guys, I don't post on weekends. Just wanted to quote myself here, in case anyone forgot...Honestly, this really does seem crazy. Sometimes I'm amazed at how good/accurate bookmakers can be, but sometimes they are way off.
I would never count Djokovic out in a big slam match, especially now that he is rounding into form and relatively fresh. I'm not a fan of his, but the guy is on another level, and then another level beyond that under pressure. There is no way he gets beaten easily, and I honestly don't see how he gets beaten at all.
Have you ever seen him live?
ROFL at the statement above. Watching Djokovic playing tennis should be a privilege for tennis fans. His athletic ability is one of the best I've ever seen. His ability to turn defence to offence is truly remarkable. His mental strength is out of this world.
Before venting your frustrations out irrationally and before you call him a d*per or some sh*t, please watch the video. Alcaraz isn't complaining. The player has said nothing.Says the player that celebrates every point like he won Wimbledon, fist pumps, grunts at the loudest volumes and yells VAMOS at the top of his lungs. This is the most absurd argument I have ever heard. Nobody celebrates more than Carlos. Its the main reason I cant stand watching him...most players wait for a big moment (like Novak). He does it on every point...
Most people have forgotten about this, but it's a very good point. I don't love Alcaraz, but his sportsmanship in that moment was impressive. He could easily have said it was a different type of injury, because we know they have no way of verifying (hence all the fake MTO's we see in the sport, including the one from Novak in this same match). That was good of Alcaraz, and there is no way we could have expected the same from his opponent, or half the guys and gals on the tour.No. And honestly props to Carlos. He probably could have invented some leg injury to get a real medical timeout and not forfeit the game, but he didn’t.
Lots of talk about Novak's celebrating once Alcaraz was cramping, and I'm definitely in the camp that thought it was ridiculous. I did see that interview where Alcaraz said it was OK, but I can't help but think he is just trying to be a good sport and not complaining after losing a match.The roar when Alcaraz missed the drop shot at deuce was just bush league.
Well, I have played sports in my life, and at a pretty high level (not tennis, but other sports). And let me tell you, there are ways of winning where you can play your heart out and still be a good winner. You can still win with class.Yes???? This ain’t make a wish fella, we’re playing to win. You’ve clearly never played sports in your life.
Every time I think that the Federer nuts are pretty annoying, and the Nadal freaks even more annoying... they get completely blown away by the Djokovic fans. It's like he is a magnet for the absolute worst, and most insecure, people.People wonder why many don't like the Djoko-bro fanbase
That's fine. But you can do it quietly, and with class.Whenever you play competitive tennis and your opponent is injured, sadly you have to figuratively put old yella down with no mercy.
Comparing athletes from different sports is pretty much impossible. Especially an individual athlete like a tennis player, whereas many other great athletes play team sports. So this statement is pretty ridiculous.The true GOAT. No one compares in any sport. It’s over. He’s on a planet of his own
Are you even a tennis fan? The only match worth watching for 6 months? So the entire AO was a waste of time? That Sinner v Alcaraz semi-final in Miami wasn't worth watching?What a pathetic match and pathetic effort from Alcaraz. How can any tennis fan be happy with having to wait 6 months for the only match worth watching in the sport ending up like this. This is honestly a disgrace to the sport. Alcaraz is absolutely fine all tournament but then no shows the only match that’s of any value or importance. This sport is seriously ****ed.
THIS! Lot's of people commenting on his fitness, which is certainly worth discussing, but what about his style of play? Maybe he shouldn't be killing himself to chase down 4 shots in a row at 40-15 or 0-40?Djokovic ran him around like a headless chicken........
It goes to show that maybe, in a B05, you don't chase down every ball to do Harlem Globetrotter type shots.
Well, Novak was running less. And yes, that is because he was playing the points better, or smarter, but the fact is that Alcaraz was doing more running/work than Djokovic. People keep making comments about a 20 year old vs a 36 year old, as if they were competing in a perfectly equal event. It's not. There are more efficient ways to play tennis, and more energy consuming ways. So it's not apples to apples.He managed his body better, that’s how he was too good. Cramping, wear-and-tear – that’s all part of the game. Novak had fewer physical issues than Alcaraz did, that’s a skill in itself (even if, yes, there is luck involved).
Huh? If anything I would think both Alcaraz and Djokovic can be suspected of it. Novak's performances and behavior are just too abnormal for it not to be suspected. And then when you consider his personality, he is absolutely the type of person that would dope without hesitation. If you know anything about Lance Armstrong, you can see the obvious similarities there. (And while pretty much everyone in cycling was doping when Lance doped, he has been the most open about it and we have a window into his mentality at the time. Sooooo many similarities to Novak).Funny how a certain poster picks and chooses who he calls out for juicing.
Haaaaa, what? Can you even formulate an argument? If Italians are known for doping, couldn't/wouldn't that imply that an Italian would be well placed to recognize it? Try using some logic before you attempt to insult someone (or an entire nation).STFU, man. Always going on about Alcaraz's supposed doping. You are Italian. Enough said.
Wow, I'm not even sure how to respond to a post like this. Reading through most of these threads, some comments seemed so ridiculous that I was sure they were sarcastic, and then I realized that some of them might not have been sarcastic at all... which is a little worrying.The Novak Derangement Syndrome is a sight to see. Right up there with Trump Derangement Syndrome!
2 GOATs hated by small minded individuals who, angry at their own life failures, attempt to tear down high achieving alpha males.
STAY MAD.
Djoker would have won with or without the typical PED induced injuries all the Spaniards seem to have.
You know I actually thought about not responding just because this post is so stupid and ridiculous, but because of how idiotic it is I just have to address it.Ok, back to discuss this some more, as this match was clearly the story of the French Open, and there are many discussion points coming out of it. I tried to get through the 70 something pages, and here are some talking points...
Most people have forgotten about this, but it's a very good point. I don't love Alcaraz, but his sportsmanship in that moment was impressive. He could easily have said it was a different type of injury, because we know they have no way of verifying (hence all the fake MTO's we see in the sport, including the one from Novak in this same match). That was good of Alcaraz, and there is no way we could have expected the same from his opponent, or half the guys and gals on the tour.
Lots of talk about Novak's celebrating once Alcaraz was cramping, and I'm definitely in the camp that thought it was ridiculous. I did see that interview where Alcaraz said it was OK, but I can't help but think he is just trying to be a good sport and not complaining after losing a match.
And look, I 100% understand that you have to keep playing hard when your opponent is injured, and can't cut them any slack. That's fine. And if he wanted to drop-shot Alcaraz all day, that would have been fine too. But why the ridiculous and exaggerated celebrations? You honestly meant to tell me that the supposed greatest player of all time can't beat a severely injured opponent without "pumping himself up" like that? That's a total joke. And there are ways of pumping yourself up without all the obnoxious yelling. Plenty of players on tour do it. Novak just can't help himself... more on that in a bit.
Well, I have played sports in my life, and at a pretty high level (not tennis, but other sports). And let me tell you, there are ways of winning where you can play your heart out and still be a good winner. You can still win with class.
I'll also add that beating an injured opponent provides little to no satisfaction to a true competitor that has some perspective and his head on straight.
Every time I think that the Federer nuts are pretty annoying, and the Nadal freaks even more annoying... they get completely blown away by the Djokovic fans. It's like he is a magnet for the absolute worst, and most insecure, people.
That's fine. But you can do it quietly, and with class.
Comparing athletes from different sports is pretty much impossible. Especially an individual athlete like a tennis player, whereas many other great athletes play team sports. So this statement is pretty ridiculous.
Are you even a tennis fan? The only match worth watching for 6 months? So the entire AO was a waste of time? That Sinner v Alcaraz semi-final in Miami wasn't worth watching?
THIS! Lot's of people commenting on his fitness, which is certainly worth discussing, but what about his style of play? Maybe he shouldn't be killing himself to chase down 4 shots in a row at 40-15 or 0-40?
Thing is, while I think he should sometimes take it down a notch, that is part of what makes Alcaraz Alcaraz. Without all those crazy gets, is he the same player? Is he this good? So maybe his only chance against the stiffer competition is to get out to a big lead early on, before he starts to run out of steam.
Well, Novak was running less. And yes, that is because he was playing the points better, or smarter, but the fact is that Alcaraz was doing more running/work than Djokovic. People keep making comments about a 20 year old vs a 36 year old, as if they were competing in a perfectly equal event. It's not. There are more efficient ways to play tennis, and more energy consuming ways. So it's not apples to apples.
And let's not forget that Novak was absolutely on the limit as well (and he admitted as much). Alcaraz grabbed that second set from him because he started getting tired and making more mistakes. Novak dug himself out of 0-40 somehow, but then dropped his next service game pretty lamely. He was super tired, and he couldn't have maintained that pace for another 3 sets either. He was just lucky that Alcaraz broke down first.
Huh? If anything I would think both Alcaraz and Djokovic can be suspected of it. Novak's performances and behavior are just too abnormal for it not to be suspected. And then when you consider his personality, he is absolutely the type of person that would dope without hesitation. If you know anything about Lance Armstrong, you can see the obvious similarities there. (And while pretty much everyone in cycling was doping when Lance doped, he has been the most open about it and we have a window into his mentality at the time. Sooooo many similarities to Novak).
Haaaaa, what? Can you even formulate an argument? If Italians are known for doping, couldn't/wouldn't that imply that an Italian would be well placed to recognize it? Try using some logic before you attempt to insult someone (or an entire nation).
Wow, I'm not even sure how to respond to a post like this. Reading through most of these threads, some comments seemed so ridiculous that I was sure they were sarcastic, and then I realized that some of them might not have been sarcastic at all... which is a little worrying.
Should Alcaraz have quit the match? If anything first, he showed respect to Djokovic by finishing the match. next, he said he didn't quit because he had a 1% chance to win even though he knew he most likely wouldn't. That's what professionals do.Watching an injured or cramping player extend a match is like watching a car accident in slow motion. Djokovic did us tennis fans a favor by keeping his intensity high and handing out a couple of breadsticks quickly to stop the agonizing dance.
That's a good point. However Carlos backhand is pretty compact and a more consistent shot than his forehand though he can hit tons of winners off that wing too. He can take the ball early and hit it down the line on the forehand wing but didn't try to or wasn't able to consistently in set 1 anyway. Novak won the FH cross court exchanges for the most part.I did note during the rallies that Djokovic’s technique on groundstrokes seems just so solid and reliable. Unbreakable. He would really lean into his shots to add power without needing the crazy racquet head speed that Alcaraz goes for on his forehand — which seems more volatile and prone to breaking down in extended rallies.
In some sense it was a victory for the old methods as well as the older player.
He needs to try pickle juice. It works quite well. But that's only one part of it.Well when you cramp, it comes from a lack of conditioning.....no ?
Carlos thought he would dig himself out of it with shot wizardry.
His "super coach" Ferrero, has a lot to answer for here imho.
Yeah it wasn’t directed at youOk, back to discuss this some more, as this match was clearly the story of the French Open, and there are many discussion points coming out of it. I tried to get through the 70 something pages, and here are some talking points...
Most people have forgotten about this, but it's a very good point. I don't love Alcaraz, but his sportsmanship in that moment was impressive. He could easily have said it was a different type of injury, because we know they have no way of verifying (hence all the fake MTO's we see in the sport, including the one from Novak in this same match). That was good of Alcaraz, and there is no way we could have expected the same from his opponent, or half the guys and gals on the tour.
Lots of talk about Novak's celebrating once Alcaraz was cramping, and I'm definitely in the camp that thought it was ridiculous. I did see that interview where Alcaraz said it was OK, but I can't help but think he is just trying to be a good sport and not complaining after losing a match.
And look, I 100% understand that you have to keep playing hard when your opponent is injured, and can't cut them any slack. That's fine. And if he wanted to drop-shot Alcaraz all day, that would have been fine too. But why the ridiculous and exaggerated celebrations? You honestly meant to tell me that the supposed greatest player of all time can't beat a severely injured opponent without "pumping himself up" like that? That's a total joke. And there are ways of pumping yourself up without all the obnoxious yelling. Plenty of players on tour do it. Novak just can't help himself... more on that in a bit.
Well, I have played sports in my life, and at a pretty high level (not tennis, but other sports). And let me tell you, there are ways of winning where you can play your heart out and still be a good winner. You can still win with class.
I'll also add that beating an injured opponent provides little to no satisfaction to a true competitor that has some perspective and his head on straight.
Every time I think that the Federer nuts are pretty annoying, and the Nadal freaks even more annoying... they get completely blown away by the Djokovic fans. It's like he is a magnet for the absolute worst, and most insecure, people.
That's fine. But you can do it quietly, and with class.
Comparing athletes from different sports is pretty much impossible. Especially an individual athlete like a tennis player, whereas many other great athletes play team sports. So this statement is pretty ridiculous.
Are you even a tennis fan? The only match worth watching for 6 months? So the entire AO was a waste of time? That Sinner v Alcaraz semi-final in Miami wasn't worth watching?
THIS! Lot's of people commenting on his fitness, which is certainly worth discussing, but what about his style of play? Maybe he shouldn't be killing himself to chase down 4 shots in a row at 40-15 or 0-40?
Thing is, while I think he should sometimes take it down a notch, that is part of what makes Alcaraz Alcaraz. Without all those crazy gets, is he the same player? Is he this good? So maybe his only chance against the stiffer competition is to get out to a big lead early on, before he starts to run out of steam.
Well, Novak was running less. And yes, that is because he was playing the points better, or smarter, but the fact is that Alcaraz was doing more running/work than Djokovic. People keep making comments about a 20 year old vs a 36 year old, as if they were competing in a perfectly equal event. It's not. There are more efficient ways to play tennis, and more energy consuming ways. So it's not apples to apples.
And let's not forget that Novak was absolutely on the limit as well (and he admitted as much). Alcaraz grabbed that second set from him because he started getting tired and making more mistakes. Novak dug himself out of 0-40 somehow, but then dropped his next service game pretty lamely. He was super tired, and he couldn't have maintained that pace for another 3 sets either. He was just lucky that Alcaraz broke down first.
Huh? If anything I would think both Alcaraz and Djokovic can be suspected of it. Novak's performances and behavior are just too abnormal for it not to be suspected. And then when you consider his personality, he is absolutely the type of person that would dope without hesitation. If you know anything about Lance Armstrong, you can see the obvious similarities there. (And while pretty much everyone in cycling was doping when Lance doped, he has been the most open about it and we have a window into his mentality at the time. Sooooo many similarities to Novak).
Haaaaa, what? Can you even formulate an argument? If Italians are known for doping, couldn't/wouldn't that imply that an Italian would be well placed to recognize it? Try using some logic before you attempt to insult someone (or an entire nation).
Wow, I'm not even sure how to respond to a post like this. Reading through most of these threads, some comments seemed so ridiculous that I was sure they were sarcastic, and then I realized that some of them might not have been sarcastic at all... which is a little worrying.
Wow, this is your attempt at insulting me? A post that appears to be written by a child (you know that not every sentence needs to be a new paragraph, right?), with little or no substance to it? Would you care to address what I actually wrote to you? (In case you forgot, you made a laughable accusation that people criticizing Djokovic never played sports in their lives, and I pointed out that many of us indeed have, and still have an issue with his antics).You know I actually thought about not responding just because this post is so stupid and ridiculous, but because of how idiotic it is I just have to address it.
You decided to take precious time out of your day to sit on a tennis forum and write paragraph after paragraph responding to posters that basically tell them they’re wrong and you’re right. Nice.
You decided to cherry pick the unsavory posts by the Djokovic fanbase (which I agree are distasteful), while ignoring the similarly disgusting posts we saw on here by Fedal fans. And before you respond, no, I’m not going back through near a hundred pages to find these posts. Unlike you, I have a life.
You also accuse Novak of doping and being a poor sport in this post. Even though there’s zero evidence of him doping, not to mention Alcaraz completely shutting down any notion that Novak was a poor sport.
Your poor attempt to hide your hatred for Novak by writing out an uneducated essay is too easy to sniff out.
It’s ok to cry and it’s ok to be upset, but I’d rather you just come out and say “I hate Djokovic blah blah” than write something like this out. Just makes it seem really embarrassing fella.
Ok, back to discuss this some more, as this match was clearly the story of the French Open, and there are many discussion points coming out of it. I tried to get through the 70 something pages, and here are some talking points...
Most people have forgotten about this, but it's a very good point. I don't love Alcaraz, but his sportsmanship in that moment was impressive. He could easily have said it was a different type of injury, because we know they have no way of verifying (hence all the fake MTO's we see in the sport, including the one from Novak in this same match). That was good of Alcaraz, and there is no way we could have expected the same from his opponent, or half the guys and gals on the tour.
Lots of talk about Novak's celebrating once Alcaraz was cramping, and I'm definitely in the camp that thought it was ridiculous. I did see that interview where Alcaraz said it was OK, but I can't help but think he is just trying to be a good sport and not complaining after losing a match.
And look, I 100% understand that you have to keep playing hard when your opponent is injured, and can't cut them any slack. That's fine. And if he wanted to drop-shot Alcaraz all day, that would have been fine too. But why the ridiculous and exaggerated celebrations? You honestly meant to tell me that the supposed greatest player of all time can't beat a severely injured opponent without "pumping himself up" like that? That's a total joke. And there are ways of pumping yourself up without all the obnoxious yelling. Plenty of players on tour do it. Novak just can't help himself... more on that in a bit.
Well, I have played sports in my life, and at a pretty high level (not tennis, but other sports). And let me tell you, there are ways of winning where you can play your heart out and still be a good winner. You can still win with class.
I'll also add that beating an injured opponent provides little to no satisfaction to a true competitor that has some perspective and his head on straight.
Every time I think that the Federer nuts are pretty annoying, and the Nadal freaks even more annoying... they get completely blown away by the Djokovic fans. It's like he is a magnet for the absolute worst, and most insecure, people.
That's fine. But you can do it quietly, and with class.
Comparing athletes from different sports is pretty much impossible. Especially an individual athlete like a tennis player, whereas many other great athletes play team sports. So this statement is pretty ridiculous.
Are you even a tennis fan? The only match worth watching for 6 months? So the entire AO was a waste of time? That Sinner v Alcaraz semi-final in Miami wasn't worth watching?
THIS! Lot's of people commenting on his fitness, which is certainly worth discussing, but what about his style of play? Maybe he shouldn't be killing himself to chase down 4 shots in a row at 40-15 or 0-40?
Thing is, while I think he should sometimes take it down a notch, that is part of what makes Alcaraz Alcaraz. Without all those crazy gets, is he the same player? Is he this good? So maybe his only chance against the stiffer competition is to get out to a big lead early on, before he starts to run out of steam.
Well, Novak was running less. And yes, that is because he was playing the points better, or smarter, but the fact is that Alcaraz was doing more running/work than Djokovic. People keep making comments about a 20 year old vs a 36 year old, as if they were competing in a perfectly equal event. It's not. There are more efficient ways to play tennis, and more energy consuming ways. So it's not apples to apples.
And let's not forget that Novak was absolutely on the limit as well (and he admitted as much). Alcaraz grabbed that second set from him because he started getting tired and making more mistakes. Novak dug himself out of 0-40 somehow, but then dropped his next service game pretty lamely. He was super tired, and he couldn't have maintained that pace for another 3 sets either. He was just lucky that Alcaraz broke down first.
Huh? If anything I would think both Alcaraz and Djokovic can be suspected of it. Novak's performances and behavior are just too abnormal for it not to be suspected. And then when you consider his personality, he is absolutely the type of person that would dope without hesitation. If
Haaaaa, what? Can you even formulate an argument? If Italians are known for doping, couldn't/wouldn't that imply that an Italian would be well placed to recognize it? Try using some logic before you attempt to insul an entire nation.
You are either too smart and a millionaire who can afford to spend several hours replying to multiple posters with childish retorts completely devoid of logic and value, or just a dullard with too much time in his hands. I wonder which is it.Ok, back to discuss this some more, as this match was clearly the story of the French Open, and there are many discussion points coming out of it. I tried to get through the 70 something pages, and here are some talking points...
Most people have forgotten about this, but it's a very good point. I don't love Alcaraz, but his sportsmanship in that moment was impressive. He could easily have said it was a different type of injury, because we know they have no way of verifying (hence all the fake MTO's we see in the sport, including the one from Novak in this same match). That was good of Alcaraz, and there is no way we could have expected the same from his opponent, or half the guys and gals on the tour.
Lots of talk about Novak's celebrating once Alcaraz was cramping, and I'm definitely in the camp that thought it was ridiculous. I did see that interview where Alcaraz said it was OK, but I can't help but think he is just trying to be a good sport and not complaining after losing a match.
And look, I 100% understand that you have to keep playing hard when your opponent is injured, and can't cut them any slack. That's fine. And if he wanted to drop-shot Alcaraz all day, that would have been fine too. But why the ridiculous and exaggerated celebrations? You honestly meant to tell me that the supposed greatest player of all time can't beat a severely injured opponent without "pumping himself up" like that? That's a total joke. And there are ways of pumping yourself up without all the obnoxious yelling. Plenty of players on tour do it. Novak just can't help himself... more on that in a bit.
Well, I have played sports in my life, and at a pretty high level (not tennis, but other sports). And let me tell you, there are ways of winning where you can play your heart out and still be a good winner. You can still win with class.
I'll also add that beating an injured opponent provides little to no satisfaction to a true competitor that has some perspective and his head on straight.
Every time I think that the Federer nuts are pretty annoying, and the Nadal freaks even more annoying... they get completely blown away by the Djokovic fans. It's like he is a magnet for the absolute worst, and most insecure, people.
That's fine. But you can do it quietly, and with class.
Comparing athletes from different sports is pretty much impossible. Especially an individual athlete like a tennis player, whereas many other great athletes play team sports. So this statement is pretty ridiculous.
Are you even a tennis fan? The only match worth watching for 6 months? So the entire AO was a waste of time? That Sinner v Alcaraz semi-final in Miami wasn't worth watching?
THIS! Lot's of people commenting on his fitness, which is certainly worth discussing, but what about his style of play? Maybe he shouldn't be killing himself to chase down 4 shots in a row at 40-15 or 0-40?
Thing is, while I think he should sometimes take it down a notch, that is part of what makes Alcaraz Alcaraz. Without all those crazy gets, is he the same player? Is he this good? So maybe his only chance against the stiffer competition is to get out to a big lead early on, before he starts to run out of steam.
Well, Novak was running less. And yes, that is because he was playing the points better, or smarter, but the fact is that Alcaraz was doing more running/work than Djokovic. People keep making comments about a 20 year old vs a 36 year old, as if they were competing in a perfectly equal event. It's not. There are more efficient ways to play tennis, and more energy consuming ways. So it's not apples to apples.
And let's not forget that Novak was absolutely on the limit as well (and he admitted as much). Alcaraz grabbed that second set from him because he started getting tired and making more mistakes. Novak dug himself out of 0-40 somehow, but then dropped his next service game pretty lamely. He was super tired, and he couldn't have maintained that pace for another 3 sets either. He was just lucky that Alcaraz broke down first.
Huh? If anything I would think both Alcaraz and Djokovic can be suspected of it. Novak's performances and behavior are just too abnormal for it not to be suspected. And then when you consider his personality, he is absolutely the type of person that would dope without hesitation.