2023 Wimbledon Final: Carlos Alcaraz vs. Novak Djokovic

2023 Wimbledon Champion?


  • Total voters
    199
  • Poll closed .
Nope, it´s not an over reaction but a prediction. Wimbledon was his best shot for one more and last slam title - game over.
We will see. I do agree it will be harder as time catches up with everyone.

As long as Rafa doesn't get any more then that is main thing for me and is only shot is likely to be RG 2024.
 
Why isn't novak being fined for this ?? this disgusting behavior. also why wasn't he penalized ??


Djokovic-demolish-racket-during-Wimbledon-final-1.jpg
Just my thoughts.

I was surprised he was not penalized, or reprimanded, or something.

The Russian girl MA, got an 8,000 quid fine, Djokovic nothing.

I'm glad he lost, he deserved.
 
I think I just caught up on what you all have been posting. Alcaraz is far, far from 6'1". I have been calling him shrimp, a term of affection, as I called y son that before he started growing a lot, but why all the exaggeration in height?
 
Regarding Sinner, I think he can learn from Alcaraz with regards to deploying variety to finish points when on top in rallies.

In the SF, Sinner was very predictable against Novak. He could have tried a few droppers, come more often to the net, drawn Novak forward and then played a pass/lob. He hardly did these plays and that made him easy to handle for Novak.

Now I know he is not very good at these things like Carlos is as of now. But he now has the knowledge of what works. He has the baseline game to keep up with Novak and even outhit him. I can see him beating Novak in HC very soon if he develops the other attributes a bit.
agree, adding drop shots somewhat consistently to his arsenal would be a huge bonus...especially for a player like him who's so good at pinning people deep with great groundstrokes. another big addition would be a short slice a la federer, which carlos did a couple times to novak as well. sinner's got powerful passing shots, why not drag people in more often?
 
sinner's got powerful passing shots, why not drag people in more often?

Sorry, In tennis there are categories. You have the architects, who design beautiful games making an exquisite use of their fine tools to win each point with creativity and skill, and you have the workers, who make intensive use of their not very wide range of tools in order to do always the same. Sinner is of the former group; I would be surprised that at this point he develops more resources that he can use in an effective and consistent way.
 
Sorry, In tennis there are categories. You have the architects, who design beautiful games making an exquisite use of their fine tools to win each point with creativity and skill, and you have the workers, who make intensive use of their not very wide range of tools in order to do always the same. Sinner is of the former group; I would be surprised that at this point he develops more resources that he can use in an effective and consistent way.
You mean latter?
 
Regarding Sinner, I think he can learn from Alcaraz with regards to deploying variety to finish points when on top in rallies.

In the SF, Sinner was very predictable against Novak. He could have tried a few droppers, come more often to the net, drawn Novak forward and then played a pass/lob. He hardly did these plays and that made him easy to handle for Novak.

Now I know he is not very good at these things like Carlos is as of now. But he now has the knowledge of what works. He has the baseline game to keep up with Novak and even outhit him. I can see him beating Novak in HC very soon if he develops the other attributes a bit.
I’ve said this before a few months back that I see Sinner as a Berdych 2.0. Very similar strokes and power. Lacking in variety, somewhat mechanical game. I hope he can add more tools to his game and some imagination as well because he has great ability.
 
Funny that a match that featured two 6-1 sets was such a tense affair! They each got a lopsided set, each got a "routine" set (6-3 and 6-4) and one set went to a tiebreak. Incredibly balanced despite those lopsided sets.
One of Novak's service games lasted 27 minutes!
 
Sorry, In tennis there are categories. You have the architects, who design beautiful games making an exquisite use of their fine tools to win each point with creativity and skill, and you have the workers, who make intensive use of their not very wide range of tools in order to do always the same. Sinner is of the former group; I would be surprised that at this point he develops more resources that he can use in an effective and consistent way.
You meant the latter group, right? Sinner isn't an "architect."
 
Regarding Sinner, I think he can learn from Alcaraz with regards to deploying variety to finish points when on top in rallies.

In the SF, Sinner was very predictable against Novak. He could have tried a few droppers, come more often to the net, drawn Novak forward and then played a pass/lob. He hardly did these plays and that made him easy to handle for Novak.

Now I know he is not very good at these things like Carlos is as of now. But he now has the knowledge of what works. He has the baseline game to keep up with Novak and even outhit him. I can see him beating Novak in HC very soon if he develops the other attributes a bit.
You can't underestimate the importance (and uniqueness) of Alcaraz's speed.

No one else on tour that I can see runs as quickly as him. That's what was putting so much pressure on Djokovic.
 
I didn't see that anyone else posted this before, it really shows Carlos's charisma. He's very classy with Martina Navratilova, knowing she's been battling cancer. And Jelena shows up at the end to congratulate him.
Thanks for posting this Beatlesfan - I watched it live yesterday, but enjoyed seeing it again. Carlos is a great kid. That beaming face and his friendly interactions with everyone are heartwarming.

I was touched by ND's own tributes to CA, and to see his folks congratulating him too was a special touch - Jelena is graceful and gracious. Such wonderful scenes.

I was very busy with family stuff yesterday, but will spend time today ( and probably for a few days) enjoying the win for Carlos / the news and re-watching the match. I haven't felt this pleased about a GS title win since Federer's time.
 
In reflecting over the win by Carlos, it is appropriate to also reflect upon the recent achievements of ND.

He has been the yardstick, the player to beat for so long that it became unnecessary to repeat it. It was a 'given'. Whether a fan of his or not, his outstanding prowess and achievements are worthy of being acknowledged as simply exceptional. This year alone, he has won the AO and FO, and was the finalist here at Wimbly. He is acclaimed as currently playing the best tennis of his illustrious career ( for example by John McEnroe and Tim Henman) at the age of 36. Having reached the pinnacle of most ever GS titles in the men's game, he continues to compete for yet more glory. Simply remarkable.

In this match, he fought to the end, giving all he had to give, as is befitting of a great champion. In defeat, he contributed to the ceremony with smiles and an eloquent speech in which he was effusive and gracious to the victor, as is befitting of a great champion.

In celebrating Carlos's victory, I pay tribute also to ND for helping to make this such a superb finals match, one that ignited the interest of the tennis world, and beyond, and will live in the memory for the forseeable future. They say it takes 2 to tango, and this match was certainly a dance of passion and intrigue. Bravo to them both.
 
Here
Novak played better than tiny. Nole Hit the cleaner ball by far. I lost count how many junk balls or mishits tiny hit at least 100.
Here’s where Novak f’d up.
1. The drop shot attempt up a mini in 2nd set tiebreaker. He mistakenly laughed it off and it cost him. A 2 set lead and it’s over.
2. Letting that service game last almost 30 mins in early 3rd set
Should’ve tapped out at 10mins and moved on as it cost him in the fifth. Serving for 30 mins straight is exhausting.
3. Not actually finishing shots in the fifth. He had every opportunity to defeat tiny but he didn’t add a few extra mph to a few shots to seal the deal.

Tiny definitely had the more spectacular shots. Maybe 5-10 but other than those he looked exceptionally average out there.

Also, tiny < 6ft tall.

It was a fairly good match but Novak really should have won in straights or maybe 4.

Physically Novak was excellent but it appears the age factor was more evident mentally and that’s what did him in.
 
I’ve said this before a few months back that I see Sinner as a Berdych 2.0. Very similar strokes and power. Lacking in variety, somewhat mechanical game. I hope he can add more tools to his game and some imagination as well because he has great ability.

Sinner is Berdych 0.75 aka discount Berdych.

berdych has by far the better serve, has clearly better fh and I'd say slightly better bh. sinner slightly better movement and arguably return.
 
Here
Novak played better than tiny. Nole Hit the cleaner ball by far. I lost count how many junk balls or mishits tiny hit at least 100.
Here’s where Novak f’d up.
1. The drop shot attempt up a mini in 2nd set tiebreaker. He mistakenly laughed it off and it cost him. A 2 set lead and it’s over.
2. Letting that service game last almost 30 mins in early 3rd set
Should’ve tapped out at 10mins and moved on as it cost him in the fifth. Serving for 30 mins straight is exhausting.
3. Not actually finishing shots in the fifth. He had every opportunity to defeat tiny but he didn’t add a few extra mph to a few shots to seal the deal.

Tiny definitely had the more spectacular shots. Maybe 5-10 but other than those he looked exceptionally average out there.

Also, tiny < 6ft tall.

It was a fairly good match but Novak really should have won in straights or maybe 4.

Physically Novak was excellent but it appears the age factor was more evident mentally and that’s what did him in.

Some legendary quotes there. Here are my favourites...

"Novak played better than Tiny"

"Nole hit the cleaner ball by far. I lost count how many junk balls or mishits, Tiny at least 100".

And my personal favourite...

"Tiny definitely had the more spectacular shots. Maybe 5-10 but other than those he looked exceptionally average out there".
 

Novak Djokovic has been fined £6,117 for smashing his racquet against the net post during his five-set defeat to Carlos Alcaraz in the Wimbledon final. Djokovic struck the net cord when he was broken in the third game of the fifth set in his defeat to the world No. 1. Eurosport's Mats Wilander says he saw no issue with Djokovic showing his emotions at a crucial moment in the match.​

 

Novak Djokovic has been fined £6,117 for smashing his racquet against the net post during his five-set defeat to Carlos Alcaraz in the Wimbledon final. Djokovic struck the net cord when he was broken in the third game of the fifth set in his defeat to the world No. 1. Eurosport's Mats Wilander says he saw no issue with Djokovic showing his emotions at a crucial moment in the match.​

Are you sure you made the headline big enough lol. I have no issue with that he deserved it for smashing it into net
 
Sorry, In tennis there are categories. You have the architects, who design beautiful games making an exquisite use of their fine tools to win each point with creativity and skill, and you have the workers, who make intensive use of their not very wide range of tools in order to do always the same. Sinner is of the former group; I would be surprised that at this point he develops more resources that he can use in an effective and consistent way.
architects need a full tool box to be complete.
 
I think I just caught up on what you all have been posting. Alcaraz is far, far from 6'1". I have been calling him shrimp, a term of affection, as I called y son that before he started growing a lot, but why all the exaggeration in height?
Gee, he's listed as six feet. What's an inch?
 
I've now seen this legendary match with the Eurosport commentary and my native Swedish commentary but would love to watch the ESPN broadcast with the US commentary. If anyone has it downloaded I would greatly appreciate it. Please PM. Thanks!
 
Legendary match(?) with 40% being total blowout sets 1/3. 4/5th sets were close to blowouts. And the second set tiebreaker where Novak can’t get routine backhands over the net. This match was an average final at best only due to the roller coaster nature of it, which was due to extremely poor play from both.
 
downloaded the match, gonna watch it tonight. i hope these two meet a few times in slams. Would love to see one in either of the hardcourt slams.
 
May be imagining this but don't think I've seen a match in which two players have hit the lines (usually baelines) so.much... feels like every second point the chalk dust flies?
It was a great match despite the win (or because of it?). The accuracy, the depth, and the movement from both men. It was a spectacle.
 

Novak Djokovic has been fined £6,117 for smashing his racquet against the net post during his five-set defeat to Carlos Alcaraz in the Wimbledon final. Djokovic struck the net cord when he was broken in the third game of the fifth set in his defeat to the world No. 1. Eurosport's Mats Wilander says he saw no issue with Djokovic showing his emotions at a crucial moment in the match.​

Did Wimbledon fine him in US Dollars? His fine was $8000 USD --> £6,117

6117 seems like an unusual number for a fine if he was fined in GBP
 
Did Wimbledon fine him in US Dollars? His fine was $8000 USD --> £6,117

6117 seems like an unusual number for a fine if he was fined in GBP
I really don't know, I just saw some news, I think it was BBc, but I'm not sure, then I copied and pasted.

The figure in pounds, it sure looks funny.
 
And the second set tiebreaker where Novak can’t get routine backhands over the net.
These two inexplicable backhands into the net and before the failed (Davidovich Fokina-like) dropper proved to be the nails in the coffin. Djokovic needed to win the breaker to virtually seal the match and blew it miserably.
 
These two inexplicable backhands into the net and before the failed (Davidovich Fokina-like) dropper proved to be the nails in the coffin. Djokovic needed to win the breaker to virtually seal the match and blew it miserably.
Djokovic broke mentally. It felt at times that he was playing a turbo charged version of himself. Except Alcaraz hit bigger. The dude is a powerhouse with crazy speed, finesse, and drive.
 
The defensive counter punching garbage doesn't always work. Next time they meet, Alcaraz will have no fear or respect and will crush Novak in straights.
 
Alcaraz played a very mediocre match, except for the 3rd set and some sections of the fifth set and still managed to subdue a near perfect Djokovic. He definitely showed a lot of nerves for most of the match and only managed to win, because of his superior shot making and artillery. Djokovic missed a few critical chances here and there , but was almost at his best, for most of the match. Once Alcaraz gets over his nerves, which this result definitely helps, I don’t see how Djokovic can win 3 sets against him on any surface. Having said that, Alcaraz is going more prone to random upsets and I fear we may not see enough matches in this rivalry in slams.

I wonder had Alcaraz won French open, defeating Djokovic in semis, would he have had the same motivation at Wimbledon? May be his loss at French fueled him to achieve greater levels at Wimbledon.
 
Back
Top