Nope, it´s not an over reaction but a prediction. Wimbledon was his best shot for one more and last slam title - game over.Again over reaction. I remember people said this before after Novak lost to Med in 2021 and Roger looked finished and Rafa out injured.
We will see. I do agree it will be harder as time catches up with everyone.Nope, it´s not an over reaction but a prediction. Wimbledon was his best shot for one more and last slam title - game over.
Just my thoughts.Why isn't novak being fined for this ?? this disgusting behavior. also why wasn't he penalized ??
![]()
agree, adding drop shots somewhat consistently to his arsenal would be a huge bonus...especially for a player like him who's so good at pinning people deep with great groundstrokes. another big addition would be a short slice a la federer, which carlos did a couple times to novak as well. sinner's got powerful passing shots, why not drag people in more often?Regarding Sinner, I think he can learn from Alcaraz with regards to deploying variety to finish points when on top in rallies.
In the SF, Sinner was very predictable against Novak. He could have tried a few droppers, come more often to the net, drawn Novak forward and then played a pass/lob. He hardly did these plays and that made him easy to handle for Novak.
Now I know he is not very good at these things like Carlos is as of now. But he now has the knowledge of what works. He has the baseline game to keep up with Novak and even outhit him. I can see him beating Novak in HC very soon if he develops the other attributes a bit.
sinner's got powerful passing shots, why not drag people in more often?
You mean latter?Sorry, In tennis there are categories. You have the architects, who design beautiful games making an exquisite use of their fine tools to win each point with creativity and skill, and you have the workers, who make intensive use of their not very wide range of tools in order to do always the same. Sinner is of the former group; I would be surprised that at this point he develops more resources that he can use in an effective and consistent way.
I’ve said this before a few months back that I see Sinner as a Berdych 2.0. Very similar strokes and power. Lacking in variety, somewhat mechanical game. I hope he can add more tools to his game and some imagination as well because he has great ability.Regarding Sinner, I think he can learn from Alcaraz with regards to deploying variety to finish points when on top in rallies.
In the SF, Sinner was very predictable against Novak. He could have tried a few droppers, come more often to the net, drawn Novak forward and then played a pass/lob. He hardly did these plays and that made him easy to handle for Novak.
Now I know he is not very good at these things like Carlos is as of now. But he now has the knowledge of what works. He has the baseline game to keep up with Novak and even outhit him. I can see him beating Novak in HC very soon if he develops the other attributes a bit.
One of Novak's service games lasted 27 minutes!Funny that a match that featured two 6-1 sets was such a tense affair! They each got a lopsided set, each got a "routine" set (6-3 and 6-4) and one set went to a tiebreak. Incredibly balanced despite those lopsided sets.
You meant the latter group, right? Sinner isn't an "architect."Sorry, In tennis there are categories. You have the architects, who design beautiful games making an exquisite use of their fine tools to win each point with creativity and skill, and you have the workers, who make intensive use of their not very wide range of tools in order to do always the same. Sinner is of the former group; I would be surprised that at this point he develops more resources that he can use in an effective and consistent way.
You can't underestimate the importance (and uniqueness) of Alcaraz's speed.Regarding Sinner, I think he can learn from Alcaraz with regards to deploying variety to finish points when on top in rallies.
In the SF, Sinner was very predictable against Novak. He could have tried a few droppers, come more often to the net, drawn Novak forward and then played a pass/lob. He hardly did these plays and that made him easy to handle for Novak.
Now I know he is not very good at these things like Carlos is as of now. But he now has the knowledge of what works. He has the baseline game to keep up with Novak and even outhit him. I can see him beating Novak in HC very soon if he develops the other attributes a bit.
That was incredible. They played 32 points in that game, enough for an entire 6-2 set.One of Novak's service games lasted 27 minutes!
Thanks for posting this Beatlesfan - I watched it live yesterday, but enjoyed seeing it again. Carlos is a great kid. That beaming face and his friendly interactions with everyone are heartwarming.I didn't see that anyone else posted this before, it really shows Carlos's charisma. He's very classy with Martina Navratilova, knowing she's been battling cancer. And Jelena shows up at the end to congratulate him.
You would have wanted him fined and losing even if he had behaved like a saint lolJust my thoughts.
I was surprised he was not penalized, or reprimanded, or something.
The Russian girl MA, got an 8,000 quid fine, Djokovic nothing.
I'm glad he lost, he deserved.
He did. Pays for a new post I guess.Although i do agree on this occasion he should have had a fine issued today.
He’s just not eliteWhat did the young Italian lack to pull off the surprise in the semifinals?
I’ve said this before a few months back that I see Sinner as a Berdych 2.0. Very similar strokes and power. Lacking in variety, somewhat mechanical game. I hope he can add more tools to his game and some imagination as well because he has great ability.
Here
Novak played better than tiny. Nole Hit the cleaner ball by far. I lost count how many junk balls or mishits tiny hit at least 100.
Here’s where Novak f’d up.
1. The drop shot attempt up a mini in 2nd set tiebreaker. He mistakenly laughed it off and it cost him. A 2 set lead and it’s over.
2. Letting that service game last almost 30 mins in early 3rd set
Should’ve tapped out at 10mins and moved on as it cost him in the fifth. Serving for 30 mins straight is exhausting.
3. Not actually finishing shots in the fifth. He had every opportunity to defeat tiny but he didn’t add a few extra mph to a few shots to seal the deal.
Tiny definitely had the more spectacular shots. Maybe 5-10 but other than those he looked exceptionally average out there.
Also, tiny < 6ft tall.
It was a fairly good match but Novak really should have won in straights or maybe 4.
Physically Novak was excellent but it appears the age factor was more evident mentally and that’s what did him in.
Are you sure you made the headline big enough lol. I have no issue with that he deserved it for smashing it into netNovak Djokovic has been fined £6,117 for smashing his racquet against the net post during his five-set defeat to Carlos Alcaraz in the Wimbledon final. Djokovic struck the net cord when he was broken in the third game of the fifth set in his defeat to the world No. 1. Eurosport's Mats Wilander says he saw no issue with Djokovic showing his emotions at a crucial moment in the match.
You meant the latter group, right? Sinner isn't an "architect."
You mean latter?
architects need a full tool box to be complete.Sorry, In tennis there are categories. You have the architects, who design beautiful games making an exquisite use of their fine tools to win each point with creativity and skill, and you have the workers, who make intensive use of their not very wide range of tools in order to do always the same. Sinner is of the former group; I would be surprised that at this point he develops more resources that he can use in an effective and consistent way.
Actually it's pretty entertaining. So many people completely giving up on Carlos. To be fair, it had all signs of a complete beat down early on. All the more exciting that he came roaring back.Over 5400 replies to this thread. Wow. Don’t think I will read back![]()
![]()
Gee, he's listed as six feet. What's an inch?I think I just caught up on what you all have been posting. Alcaraz is far, far from 6'1". I have been calling him shrimp, a term of affection, as I called y son that before he started growing a lot, but why all the exaggeration in height?
You’re doing too much. Do less.I've now seen this legendary match with the Eurosport commentary and my native Swedish commentary but would love to watch the ESPN broadcast with the US commentary. If anyone has it downloaded I would greatly appreciate it. Please PM. Thanks!
Please explain what you mean?You’re doing too much. Do less.
Watching this match 3 times is ridiculousPlease explain what you mean?
This could end up being real but of course these are early days. He's 16-2 in his career with Queens and Wimbledon trophies. This has been a formidable start to say the least.Carlos best grass player
It was a great match despite the win (or because of it?). The accuracy, the depth, and the movement from both men. It was a spectacle.May be imagining this but don't think I've seen a match in which two players have hit the lines (usually baelines) so.much... feels like every second point the chalk dust flies?
It's a beautiful wing isn't, it? It may not be as reliable as it was in this Wimbledon all the time but it's a beautiful two-hander.that backhand finish from Alcadazzle is instant legend
Did Wimbledon fine him in US Dollars? His fine was $8000 USD --> £6,117Novak Djokovic has been fined £6,117 for smashing his racquet against the net post during his five-set defeat to Carlos Alcaraz in the Wimbledon final. Djokovic struck the net cord when he was broken in the third game of the fifth set in his defeat to the world No. 1. Eurosport's Mats Wilander says he saw no issue with Djokovic showing his emotions at a crucial moment in the match.
I really don't know, I just saw some news, I think it was BBc, but I'm not sure, then I copied and pasted.Did Wimbledon fine him in US Dollars? His fine was $8000 USD --> £6,117
6117 seems like an unusual number for a fine if he was fined in GBP
A billion people watched the match apparently. Huge for the sport. It feels like 00s Fedal days, this past week.400,000 watching on an Indian OTT, big numbers to be honest
when you have a hammer, everything looks like a nail.architects need a full tool box to be complete.
These two inexplicable backhands into the net and before the failed (Davidovich Fokina-like) dropper proved to be the nails in the coffin. Djokovic needed to win the breaker to virtually seal the match and blew it miserably.And the second set tiebreaker where Novak can’t get routine backhands over the net.
Djokovic could exploit Federer's BH and force the error. Couldn't do that against Alcaraz.Overall winners count:
Alcaraz 66 - 32 Djokovic
Djokovic broke mentally. It felt at times that he was playing a turbo charged version of himself. Except Alcaraz hit bigger. The dude is a powerhouse with crazy speed, finesse, and drive.These two inexplicable backhands into the net and before the failed (Davidovich Fokina-like) dropper proved to be the nails in the coffin. Djokovic needed to win the breaker to virtually seal the match and blew it miserably.
Lol then how did he stretch it to five. Djokovic creates forced errors which are as good as winners. Don't talk nonsense.Djokovic could exploit Federer's BH and force the error. Couldn't do that against Alcaraz.