2023 Wimbledon SF: Novak Djokovic vs. Jannik Sinner

Who wins?


  • Total voters
    154
  • Poll closed .

NoleFam

Bionic Poster
Not the wrong man. Same could be said for Federer and Nadal. No one has emerged. Yes, that's not Novak's fault, but it is certainly a problem for the sport, which has no drama at all now that the other two are gone - and didn't really unless two of the three were facing off prior to that - and even then, Novak's biggest threat off of clay was a guy six years older and his only real hurdle on clay was Nadal. Boring watching the same guys "spit the bit" every single time...
When you have three GOATs playing at the same time, there's little chance for an ATG emerging or even one who can win 3 or 4 Slams. We still got that with Murray and Wawrinka. An ATG doesn't truly emerge until their 1st dominant season or when they at least have won about 3 Slams and reached #1. That time is pretty much right the horizon for Alcaraz. Djokovic is in his twilight years and doing amazing things so I don't see how this is bad for tennis. You have plenty of time to see other players win big in the future.
 

zvelf

Hall of Fame
Let's not forget that Sinner is still very young. The pressure we put on these players in their early twenties is huge.
All of these people are writing Sinner off, but he still played better than Rune did against Alcaraz. Sinner won a higher percentage of 1st and 2nd serves, net points, receiving points, and had more winners and fewer unforced errors than Rune. So basically Sinner out-statted Rune in every area.
 

zvelf

Hall of Fame
No, the counting is odd. Sinner made many more than that number. They were counted as forced. It's just a way to make the matches look better than they were.
Most points in a match are typically forced errors, more than winners and unforced errors, so that's not unusual. If I'm to believe the official Wimbledon stats or some random guy on the internet, I'm taking the official Wimbledon stats.
 

fundrazer

G.O.A.T.
Most points in a match are typically forced errors, more than winners and unforced errors, so that's not unusual. If I'm to believe the official Wimbledon stats or some random guy on the internet, I'm taking the official Wimbledon stats.
Wimbledon is very generous with how they grade errors. This has been common understanding for a long time.
 
Sinner was pathetic today when it mattered. Let’s call it what it is. He will never ever get a better draw to an SF than that, plus two days off to recover.

He went backwards in every way from last year.

Ultimately, an exceedingly frustrating loss and one that signifies just how far he is off the top level.
Many of us knew this is what Sinner is made of and said so before the match. The sad thing is that aside from the breakpoints and key points he had on serve, he played well, well enough to win and actually had the game to win, but did t have the mental fortitude nor belief. Sad.
 
Wimbledon is very generous with how they grade errors. This has been common understanding for a long time.
True. I’ve charted a few matches by watching them And almost always the unforced errors that I would come up with would be higher than what the official stats say, but that has happened forever at Wimbledon. If someone is coming to net and even if the passing shot is an easy one, a miss won’t be called an error. Similarly, because there’s no true balance on grass although more so than I used to be, the stats keepers are very generous with the unforced error counts, which logically does make sense.
 
I am man, it’s happening too much now. 4/26 break points in the Tsitsipas match at AO and he’s a complete disaster on BPS here
Sinner is never going to win anything —he just doesn’t have it.
This happened last year too
It Will keep on happening
You’re going to be really surprised today
Never going to happen—he doesn’t have it. Alcaraz Has already won more than center will win in his career.
 

maupp

Semi-Pro
You have this warped idea that age automatically means a win. It means nothing if the older player is just better than you on every level regardless of age.
It get annoying when posters evaluate players not by their level of play but their age. Basically what he want is for us to completely ignore Djokovic's level of play and pretend he sucks because he's 36. He goes on about it like a broken record as if we don't have eyes to see that Djokovic despite his advanced aged(in terms of sport) is still playing at an elite level and still the best around.
 

NoleFam

Bionic Poster
It get annoying when posters evaluate players not by their level of play but their age. Basically what he want is for us to completely ignore Djokovic's level of play and pretend he sucks because he's 36. He goes on about it like a broken record as if we don't have eyes to see that Djokovic despite his advanced aged(in terms of sport) is still playing at an elite level and still the best around.
This is what I'm saying and been trying to get him to see but he is stuck into this age narrative. Refuses to actually look at the levels and compare them.
 

a10best

Legend
Then that just shows that the 20-22 year old's are weak, thanks for proving my point.
I think if Alcaraz is in the same position as Sinner was with a break point and 15-40 lead he'd squander it too to Djokovic. These guys just give away really important points with brain-dead decisions against Novak. Two totally unforced errors by Sinner.
 

roysid

Legend
No, dual citizenship is allowed. Plenty of Brits (mostly celebrities) have dual British and American citizenship. Don't think the US recognises it though.
If two countries agree, they provide dual citizenship provided citizens of one country wish to gain and is eligible for second citizenship. Usually between friendly countries.
Some country like India does not allow dual citizenship, so Indians wanting to take citizenship of USA, UK, Australia etc have to relinquish their indian citizenship
 
This is what I'm saying and been trying to get him to see but he is stuck into this age narrative. Refuses to actually look at the levels and compare them.
It's because it's unfair that a 36 year old man can retrieve shots like he does while also being able to whip out the servebotting of prime Federer in times of great need.
 

Nostradamus

Bionic Poster
Thanks for wasting my time,,,, took friday off to watch this Fiasco of semis........ i want my money back for taking time off........ i will send you the Bill.

wasted-friday-video-design-template-02e59cc8ef12088028ca2f008b16f5e4_screen.jpg
 

World Beater

Hall of Fame
sinner hits the ball hard, but his hands dont have much feel and his court craft is below average.
contrast with alcaraz who has power, feel and court craft.

i expected a better fight from sinner, and this was disappointing. sinner needs to regroup else novak will beat him until he is 40.
 

Chopin

Legend
Sinner is a bum. None of these guys are capable of playing any kind of special tennis. Djokovic just keeps the ball in play and these guys all implode. I mean a geriatric Federer had match points against a better version of Djokovic 4 years ago and these young guns can’t even take a set. It’s ****ing pitiful.

I agree it was a disappointing performance, but honestly, this type of sentiment makes me leary about the quality of discussion on these boards. I'm not even a fan, but it's clear Djokovic is playing some phenomenal tennis. Did you see how he was serving today? There's a little bit more to it than keeping the ball in play ha.
 

ACE of Hearts

Bionic Poster
I agree it was a disappointing performance, but honestly, this type of sentiment makes me leary about the quality of discussion on these boards. I'm not even a fan, but it's clear Djokovic is playing some phenomenal tennis. Did you see how he was serving today? There's a little bit more to it than keeping the ball in play ha.

His serve has spotty in the first two sets especially the second set. Sinner had chances to break on secon serves. Dude was lame today.
 

NoleFam

Bionic Poster
Naw he would win wimbledon againsh this field. Are you kidding me? Lol he would breakthrough.
So you'd bank on him beating Alcaraz and Hurkacz with his 2022 form? I wouldn't. I don't even think he gets past Hurkacz and he would have had a tougher time with Thompson.
 

maupp

Semi-Pro
Haha, I think you and me are the only two people on this forum who think that Med will have a better chance, but I believe it would be more challenging for Djokov game-wise as well, he doesn't need someone who has the patience to counter-punch him to death at this age. Plus, he already has the experience of beating him in the finals.
I'm also of the same thinking and I think even Djokovic would prefer playing Alcaraz over Medvedev.

Despite laying a dud in th semi, there is always and off chance Medvedev get hot in serve and start serving from a three which is what happened at the US Open.

Nole would rather deal with someone who has insane power from his groundstroke than someone who can completely trouble him with insane serving plus good baseline game which is what Medvedev is potentially capable of in any given match.

Alcaraz has a powerful ground game but Djokovic handles that well. Rublev is one power hitter and Nole handled him. Sinner is an even bigger one and Djokovic didn't have much issues with him, especially when his serve is up and down.

Carlos obviously is better than the 2 mentioned but Djokovic would prefer facing him(powerful ground game and consistent on the baseline) than a powerful server which won't be the case with Alcaraz.
 
Top