Very late to the party, but for what it's worth my 2 cents:
A friend recommended me to try the 2023 Vcore 95, so I got a demo from TW. Over the summer I played with the Prince Phantom Pro 93p and the past week I went back to a Prestige Tour 600 I had lying around, as I had gotten some pain in my extensor muscles.
Anyway, today I had a doubles match and decided to try the Vcore 95. So here are my impressions:
What most surprised me was that I just pulled out this racquet and really played just as well with it as with my other, known, sticks. Virtually no adjustment except for a few double faults.
Caveat, this was a rather slow social doubles match, so I didn't have high speed balls coming at me. I had no timing issues whatsoever, nor did I suffer a lack of control. Even the launch angle on this open pattern 16x20 frame didn't cause me the least of problems, coming from closed pattern frames. I felt I could add the necesary spin to keep the ball in if needed and also that I could flatten out my shots whenever possible. Pretty much a racquet that gives you whatever you put into it.
I had the impression that with the right mechanics this racquet can hit a powerful ball. Obviously in a doubles match you have less court to play into, so it is more difficult to hit outright winners but I did hit a few clean passing shots and "heavy" groundstrokes that did not come back. I had the occasion of playing several volleys, drop shots and touch shots and pretty much all I can say is that the racquet does what you require from it. Simple as that statement may seem, I believe it is about as much praise as one can bestow on a piece of equipment. After all, we want our gear to be reliable and predictable on pressure points.
On serve I probably need some dialing in, but I see no issues that wouldn't make it work for me. With the right toss, swing speed and timing I am quite sure I could hit some unreturnable serves.
One note of interest: the onehanded backhand is very sweet with this frame. One of the best frames I have played with for the onehander. (For some reason the best frame for that was the Prince NXG mid. I could produce backhand winner after winner with that frame. Unfortunately I sold it as it didn't lift the rest of my game.)
So, given the fact that this racquet plays like a player's racquet giving what you put into it, I think the most interesting part is the feel of the racquet. It feels soft and yet, powerwise, it seems to produce the response of a stiffer frame, probably because of the beam width, which is wider than traditional player's frames. There is definitely a sense of cupping of the ball and dwell time. In stock form the racquet feels very manoeuverable and I suspect that for high level play it might benefit from some customizing.
What I liked was the uniformity of the stringbed reponse. The sweetspot was where I expected it to be. I did not notice any instability, launchiness or wobble. Overall a very solid frame that you could take into a tournament. It works best when you are dictating the points but because of its manoeuverability, it makes it easier to get prepared on time for defense shots.
I will try to put in some more time with the frame because this is only a first impression. My opinion might still change against a heavy hitter. The racquet came strung with Yonex Poly Tour Rev 1.25, string tension unknown, but it wouldn't surprise me if it had been strung at 52 and dropped to about 48 by now. I do have the impression that you would either have to string it high or with a poly to keep control over the open string pattern.
Oh, and Yonex grip sizes do appear to run big. It felt quite chunky to me for a size 3.
Can anyone compare this frame to the current generation Vcore Pro 97 and / or the Vcore Pro 97 HD (previous generation with 59 RA flex)?
tennishub.com
