Djokovic_is_the_best#1
Bionic Poster
Sinner moves pretty well on a clay court. He learns fast
I guess you missed the match in Miami where Grigor used that "one handed ballerina backhand" to absolute school Alcaraz (and everyone else he had played prior)...That's not "wrong". Grigor is just proving how useless the one handed ballerina backhand is in the "modern game"![]()
I agree. I like and support Sinner, but it seems super obvious he still gets tight in certain spots. I mean, he even admits as much in interviews (which I think is a mistake, that he lets everyone know), but people seem to just ignore his comments for some reason.There is absolutely one hundred percent a question mark, maybe a little one not a big one, but still a question mark, over Jannik Sinner's big match nerve.
I guess you missed the match in Miami where Grigor used that "one handed ballerina backhand" to absolute school Alcaraz (and everyone else he had played prior)...
I agree. I like and support Sinner, but it seems super obvious he still gets tight in certain spots. I mean, he even admits as much in interviews (which I think is a mistake, that he lets everyone know), but people seem to just ignore his comments for some reason.
In my opinion he can win it. If he makes the final he will. Alcaraz likely will be a big hurdle to pass though.
Hopefully he doesn't follow in Kafelnikov's footsteps and lose six straight as world number one!Jannik Sinner, the first man to celebrate becoming world number 1... by choking away a match.
I'm glad he got a YEC, anyway.You gotta feel for Dimi. He is just not good enough against the absolute best.
What else could you have said then? "This guy is a mug and deserves to lose"????So bored of the interview culture where the winner is forced to say what a talented nice guy the losing player is.
I have a feeling he'll stay there for awhile.Congratulations to Sinner on the new world no1! Amazing achievement!![]()
What else could you have said then? "This guy is a mug and deserves to lose"????
Wawrinka never did much outside of slams to accumulate enough points and that was close enough to prime Big 3 era and Murray if you want to throw him in there so it was tough to crack the top 4 nevermind get #1. Not as much competition for Sinner at the top with Djokovic MIA in 2024 and Alcaraz inconsistency. Still, quite an accomplishment for the Italian.Stan won 3 slams and he never reached n.1 , sinner has 1
I think most players have too much pride for that. I know Fritz wasn't interested when this was brought up after he lost to Nadal at Wimbledon. You could have him play some kind of exhibition to get him match time, to get the ticket buyers more tennis, to make it more fair on the guy who doesn't get the bye, but then... What if he gets injured in that exhibition? There's no way to make it work.I think they should change the rules, when a player retires the one who lost in the previous round should go through. Now Ruud in the semi without playing
The biggest threat in my opinion is ADM. He can drive his opponent to self destruct with his boring game.With Djokovic's withdrawal, Zverev is now favorite in my book. He has the weapons to win this. If he faces Alcaraz in final, he knows how to win against him.
Before that, deminaur and then Ruud would be greater challenge
This is in fact the most logical thing to do. I think they don’t do it to avoid paying the players.i Really think we should have a Rule that saids if players retires due to injury, and Can't play next round ,, that loser can advance and play in the next round. so Cerundolo should advance and play. Otherwise, fans are Robbed of the match and lose the money for the ticket.
What do you think about this Rule change ?? If you guys approve, i will email it to the ATP player council immediately. Thank you![]()
![]()
not so sure its the money... just take away the money from novak and give it to Cerundolo. Novak doesnt' need it.This is in fact the most logical thing to do. I think they don’t do it to avoid paying the players.
I’d love to see big Z win it!With Djokovic's withdrawal, Zverev is now favorite in my book. He has the weapons to win this. If he faces Alcaraz in final, he knows how to win against him.
Before that, deminaur and then Ruud would be greater challenge
not so sure its the money... just take away the money from novak and give it to Cerundolo. Novak doesnt' need it.![]()
Ok i agree with you. I think Slams should have reserve money for times like this. I will propose the Rule change to players counsel but for Grand Slam events onlythey should still give the money/points to the retired players, or nobody would retire.
I’d love to see big Z win it!
I read it with Sinner's voice.So bored with the interview culture where the winner is forced to say what a talented nice guy the losing player is.
It´s awfully bad luck for Djokovic to begin with. The only good thing in all of this is that it isn´t the Zedmug who benefits from his withdrawal.I hope goldie chainz makes the final from the top half. We will see. I like Ruud too as well. I feel big Z got a great chance though
I read it with Sinner's voice.
Zed's got a good chance of winning this thing, though.It´s awfully bad luck for Djokovic to begin with. The only good thing in all of this is that it isn´t the Zedmug who benefits from his withdrawal.
Agreei Really think we should have a Rule that saids if players retires due to injury, and Can't play next round ,, that loser can advance and play in the next round. so Cerundolo should advance and play. Otherwise, fans are Robbed of the match and lose the money for the ticket.
What do you think about this Rule change ?? If you guys approve, i will email it to the ATP player council immediately. Thank you![]()
![]()