2024 US Open 2R: [1] Jannik Sinner (ITA) vs [14] Tommy Paul (USA)

Who wins this 4th round clash?


  • Total voters
    22
  • Poll closed .
Sinner heavy groundstrokes makes it impossible to stay at baseline or even move to net for Paul. That's how he competes vs raz but sinner is too good.
 
Damn those missile FH from Sinner, Carlos should learn how to play percentage and agressive tennis at the same time from Sinner ( on HC)
 
Some insanely long rallies already.

Paul just won what has to have been a 25+ shot rally there. (popup just said it was 24 shots!)

Med will be eating this up.
 
Sampras Bruguera is not wrong when he says Sinner will clean sweep majority of HC slams, hard to argue against that. Sadly Alcaraz will play second fiddle to him
 
Dude let’s wait before you claim that. Alcaraz has more GSs than this guy at the moment.
Yep, even if Sinner wins the slam here (going down 2 breaks quickly isn't exactly promising in the 4R but), he'll still have half the slams of Alcaraz despite being 2 years older.

Sinner needs some steroid cream to catch up!
 
This is just attack on someone's accomplishment because they started late. This member their self knows they are lying and are able to see the game. But don't want to accept.
I see his game. I think he is immensely talented and is the best ball striker on tour. I have said this before and I do not criticize his game.

However, there are people on here who constantly tell me how he’s already better than Alcaraz, will win every HC slam for the next 15 years, and I don’t know what they are seeing. He hasn’t shown the ability to consistently (that being the key word) dominate. I understand why people think he’s very good right now, but Alcaraz has shown brilliance that intimates he will be an all-time great—the comebacks at Wimbledon, the Wimby defense, two comebacks from 2-1 down in RG. I haven’t seen that out of sinner and while his game his beautiful and very good, I don’t know why people think he’s going to keep this level for 15 years when he can’t even keep it for a full season
 
Dude let’s wait before you claim that. Alcaraz has more GSs than this guy at the moment.
Yes but let's not forget there are two slams on HC and Sinner has vastly improved, his game is more productive on HC, tailor made like Djokovic with more aggression. Did you see how helpless Carlos looked on HC for more than a year?? On grass he gets away with his game but on HC his lack of point construction and shot selection gets more pronounced. Now he had a genius idea of standing near stand to return the serve.
 
This is some flashy stuff by Paul, if he can cut out the errors (like that awful shank), we have a real match.

Game point.

Then he hits a bad unforced error, back to deuce.
 
I see his game. I think he is immensely talented and is the best ball striker on tour. I have said this before and I do not criticize his game.

However, there are people on here who constantly tell me how he’s already better than Alcaraz, will win every HC slam for the next 15 years, and I don’t know what they are seeing. He hasn’t shown the ability to consistently (that being the key word) dominate. I understand why people think he’s very good right now, but Alcaraz has shown brilliance that intimates he will be an all-time great—the comebacks at Wimbledon, the Wimby defense, two comebacks from 2-1 down in RG. I haven’t seen that out of sinner and while his game his beautiful and very good, I don’t know why people think he’s going to keep this level for 15 years when he can’t even keep it for a full season
What do you mean he can't keep it for a full season? Have you checked his stats this year? Highest winning percentage on tour. A bit inconsistent on clay but that will always be the case.
 
I see his game. I think he is immensely talented and is the best ball striker on tour. I have said this before and I do not criticize his game.

However, there are people on here who constantly tell me how he’s already better than Alcaraz, will win every HC slam for the next 15 years, and I don’t know what they are seeing. He hasn’t shown the ability to consistently (that being the key word) dominate. I understand why people think he’s very good right now, but Alcaraz has shown brilliance that intimates he will be an all-time great—the comebacks at Wimbledon, the Wimby defense, two comebacks from 2-1 down in RG. I haven’t seen that out of sinner and while his game his beautiful and very good, I don’t know why people think he’s going to keep this level for 15 years when he can’t even keep it for a full season
Yes there are some 2 cent trolls sinner army. I have put them on ingore. They don't believe half of what they type.
 
Great hold by Tommy Paul who saves set point and holds for 5-5.

Some big serves to close that hold out. Needs to cut out the unforced errors.
 
Back
Top