nolefam_2024
Bionic Poster
All american semis of a slam
Not sure. I started watching right as the third set started. Seems about when he started slowing down.Did this happen during the third set?
The guy is in real pain, no point in delaying the inevitable or hurting himself worse somehow.What a bi** Grigor. Could've really played those couple more games lmao
No he couldn’t. He was grimacing badly just walking in the hallway. Playing more could have done even worse damage. He should have retired earlier.What a bi** Grigor. Could've really played those couple more games lmao
That's not star power -- it's entertainment value for the people already there. Star power is what gets people to the match when they have no idea what's going to happen, who's going to win, what the level of play will be, what antics they will witness, etc. It's possible to be both charismatic in person and relatively obscure in the public eye.Tiafoe 100% has star power, he's the definition of a crowd pleaser.
Sure.I never expected him to reach a Masters final again, but he did that this year.
I understand the things against him, but saying he had a chance to beat Tiafoe and Fritz wasn't exactly farfetched. He's still top 10 in the world for a reason.
Couldn't understand what they said exactly, but from the few words I could read and their gestures it seemed like tiafoe was asking dimitrov what happened, and dimitrov was explaining, etc.Any lip readers out there? Curious what they said to each other at the net.
Tiafoe is the most popular American player at the most popular American event, he's a USO star even though he's never won the event, just listen to how electric the crowds are for a Tiafoe match it's just "different" when he's on center court at night. He might not have the star power of The Big 3 or Alcaraz but he's definitely a major draw at American events. Tonight is a weird night, the first day back to work after a Holiday weekend and back to school for most kids so that's probably why the seats weren't entirely full.That's not star power -- it's entertainment value for the people already there. Star power is what gets people to the match when they have no idea what's going to happen, who's going to win, what the level of play will be, what antics they will witness, etc. It's possible to be both charismatic in person and relatively obscure in the public eye.
Sinner has no weird cloud over him. You are just trying to find negative in everythingSure.
We're also in one of the most bizarre uncertain transitional periods in tennis in quite some time.
Novak is still a threat to win a slam but not a sure thing to win anymore because age may finally be playing a factor in his career.
Carlitos is mostly consistent but had a weird hiccup this tourney.
Sinner has that weird cloud over him.
Felix disappointing. Tsitsipas, Zverev, might have had their best chances to win a slam already and they're still young.
This might be the new norm now. We just were so used to the Big 3 + Murray consistently getting through the second week of slams and claiming spots in the finals and semis for almost two full decades.
Oh and Ruud is essentially useless off clay.
He was very fortunate against a poor Rublev, his chances of beating an in form Tiafoe and Fritz we're very slim to begin with.I never expected him to reach a Masters final again, but he did that this year.
I understand the things against him, but saying he had a chance to beat Tiafoe and Fritz wasn't exactly farfetched. He's still top 10 in the world for a reason.
Dude, he is already 33. Remember what happened to Fed after AO2020.What a bi** Grigor. Could've really played those couple more games lmao
By your definition he has star power because he’s one of the reasons I started seriously watching tennis a year ago and even start playing.That's not star power -- it's entertainment value for the people already there. Star power is what gets people to the match when they have no idea what's going to happen, who's going to win, what the level of play will be, what antics they will witness, etc. It's possible to be both charismatic in person and relatively obscure in the public eye.
Probably had hope if he played Medvedev since nobody is as good at self destructing as Medvedev.He never had a chance, some of you are on crack, even if he miraculously got to the final would've got destroyed.
Sinner has no weird cloud over him. You are just trying to find negative in everything
He is your number 1 and damn consistent 90% territory player. You want consistency go towards the light that is sinner
My definition is not based on what motivates or pleases you. It's based on what motivates or pleases huge mass audiences.By your definition he has star power because he’s one of the reasons I started seriously watching tennis a year ago and even start playing.
Dude, he is already 33. Remember what happened to Fed after AO2020.
Yeah, since 2015 he has fundamentally been a grinder.Fred was 38 or 39 at that point with tons tons more matches played and mileage on his body than Dimi is right now.
Although with how much Dimitrov grinds every match and has the same way for the last 10 years, he probably has run the same total distance on court playing a few matches per tournament than Roger had playing to the semis and finals almost every tourney.
Dimi also never had the serve Roger had. The cheap points from aces and unreturned serves after Rog switched to the 97 racquet cannot be understated on how much that extended his career. Rafaalso never developed his serve enough to get aces and cheap points. Novak to his credit has improved his serve as he's gotten older which has helped his body survive the type of game he is known for.
Yes agreed. He is more lively on the court and thats bring him supportersThat's not star power -- it's entertainment value for the people already there. Star power is what gets people to the match when they have no idea what's going to happen, who's going to win, what the level of play will be, what antics they will witness, etc. It's possible to be both charismatic in person and relatively obscure in the public eye.
Why didn't he take an MTO?
I didn't realize that. I thought he just went for a bathroom break and it was far to the locker room.Grigor did take a MTO after the 3rd set ended. He was off the court with a trainer for about 10 minutes before the 4th set started.
They didn't announce what happened and Grigor didn't say anything audible other than when he told his coaches that he couldn't take more than two steps in a row towards a shot. It looked like a hamstring or lower back strain.
Did you see his quarter final against Alcaraz in Miami? He wiped the floor with Carlos, and Alcaraz was in decent form (having just won IW). Then then played great again to beat Zverev.He was very fortunate against a poor Rublev, his chances of beating an in form Tiafoe and Fritz we're very slim to begin with.
Ok, but that's only because Tiafoe hasn't actually won anything really big, like a slam. If he won a slam, he would be getting close, and if he won multiple slams he would definitely be a huge star in the USA. He has a good personality, a fun game to watch, and he ticks all the right boxes that people seem to need ticked these days.My definition is not based on what motivates or pleases you. It's based on what motivates or pleases huge mass audiences.
I wasn't the one who observed that empty seats were visible. I'm merely offering an explanation. Tiafoe and Dimitrov both have their fans. But this is no marquee matchup.
Man, that sucks. I was rooting for Tiafoe, but would not have minded a Grigor win, since I like him. It's just a terrible way to end. You want to see a great match, no matter who wins.
What happened? His injury just seemed to come out of nowhere. But, cramps and stiffness/tightness can do that. Just suddenly it comes and it's your hip, hamstring, butt. Looked like he just tightened up. Or more serious? Why didn't he take an MTO?
That wasn't me overhyping Dimitrov based on his rank. Because all those things are true for Tiafoe and Fritz too, and they're still below him. It was more of a negative for them.Sure.
We're also in one of the most bizarre uncertain transitional periods in tennis in quite some time.
Novak is still a threat to win a slam but not a sure thing to win anymore because age may finally be playing a factor in his career.
Carlitos is mostly consistent but had a weird hiccup this tourney.
Sinner has that weird cloud over him.
Felix disappointing. Tsitsipas, Zverev, might have had their best chances to win a slam already and they're still young.
This might be the new norm now. We just were so used to the Big 3 + Murray consistently getting through the second week of slams and claiming spots in the finals and semis for almost two full decades.
Oh and Ruud is essentially useless off clay.
If Tiafoe or Fritz win a slam God help us.That wasn't me overhyping Dimitrov based on his rank. Because all those things are true for Tiafoe and Fritz too, and they're still below him. It was more of a negative for them.
They can do nothing but try. I don't see why it's so terrible. It's not their fault the draw got busted. If Sinner or Med can't stop them (which I fully expect they can), that's on them.If Tiafoe or Fritz win a slam God help us.
It would be better than seeing Ruud winning the French after Novak, Sinner, Alcaraz, Tsitispas all get upset in week 1 and Ruud would beat Nishioka in the Final.