2024 US Open Mens Quarterfinals: [9] Grigor Dimitrov (BUL) vs [20] Frances Tiafoe (USA)

Who wins?

  • Dimitrov in 3

    Votes: 1 3.4%
  • Dimitrov in 4

    Votes: 5 17.2%
  • Dimitrov in 5

    Votes: 5 17.2%
  • Tiafoe in 5

    Votes: 2 6.9%
  • Tiafoe in 4

    Votes: 12 41.4%
  • Tiafoe in 3

    Votes: 4 13.8%

  • Total voters
    29
  • Poll closed .
Tiafoe 100% has star power, he's the definition of a crowd pleaser.
That's not star power -- it's entertainment value for the people already there. Star power is what gets people to the match when they have no idea what's going to happen, who's going to win, what the level of play will be, what antics they will witness, etc. It's possible to be both charismatic in person and relatively obscure in the public eye.
 
I never expected him to reach a Masters final again, but he did that this year.

I understand the things against him, but saying he had a chance to beat Tiafoe and Fritz wasn't exactly farfetched. He's still top 10 in the world for a reason.
Sure.

We're also in one of the most bizarre uncertain transitional periods in tennis in quite some time.

Novak is still a threat to win a slam but not a sure thing to win anymore because age may finally be playing a factor in his career.

Carlitos is mostly consistent but had a weird hiccup this tourney.

Sinner has that weird cloud over him.

Felix disappointing. Tsitsipas, Zverev, might have had their best chances to win a slam already and they're still young.

This might be the new norm now. We just were so used to the Big 3 + Murray consistently getting through the second week of slams and claiming spots in the finals and semis for almost two full decades.


Oh and Ruud is essentially useless off clay.
 
That's not star power -- it's entertainment value for the people already there. Star power is what gets people to the match when they have no idea what's going to happen, who's going to win, what the level of play will be, what antics they will witness, etc. It's possible to be both charismatic in person and relatively obscure in the public eye.
Tiafoe is the most popular American player at the most popular American event, he's a USO star even though he's never won the event, just listen to how electric the crowds are for a Tiafoe match it's just "different" when he's on center court at night. He might not have the star power of The Big 3 or Alcaraz but he's definitely a major draw at American events. Tonight is a weird night, the first day back to work after a Holiday weekend and back to school for most kids so that's probably why the seats weren't entirely full.
 
Sure.

We're also in one of the most bizarre uncertain transitional periods in tennis in quite some time.

Novak is still a threat to win a slam but not a sure thing to win anymore because age may finally be playing a factor in his career.

Carlitos is mostly consistent but had a weird hiccup this tourney.

Sinner has that weird cloud over him.

Felix disappointing. Tsitsipas, Zverev, might have had their best chances to win a slam already and they're still young.

This might be the new norm now. We just were so used to the Big 3 + Murray consistently getting through the second week of slams and claiming spots in the finals and semis for almost two full decades.


Oh and Ruud is essentially useless off clay.
Sinner has no weird cloud over him. You are just trying to find negative in everything

He is your number 1 and damn consistent 90% territory player. You want consistency go towards the light that is sinner
 
I never expected him to reach a Masters final again, but he did that this year.

I understand the things against him, but saying he had a chance to beat Tiafoe and Fritz wasn't exactly farfetched. He's still top 10 in the world for a reason.
He was very fortunate against a poor Rublev, his chances of beating an in form Tiafoe and Fritz we're very slim to begin with.
 
That's not star power -- it's entertainment value for the people already there. Star power is what gets people to the match when they have no idea what's going to happen, who's going to win, what the level of play will be, what antics they will witness, etc. It's possible to be both charismatic in person and relatively obscure in the public eye.
By your definition he has star power because he’s one of the reasons I started seriously watching tennis a year ago and even start playing.
 
He never had a chance, some of you are on crack, even if he miraculously got to the final would've got destroyed.
Probably had hope if he played Medvedev since nobody is as good at self destructing as Medvedev.

Sinner I agree it would have been a complete route.
 
Sinner has no weird cloud over him. You are just trying to find negative in everything

He is your number 1 and damn consistent 90% territory player. You want consistency go towards the light that is sinner

He's going to have to be consistent for the next two-three years winning a few slams for a lot of people to forget the bizarreness of the failed drug tests.

Rafa and Novak were accused of doping for years but never failed a drug test.

Sinner hasn't even hit his peak yet and already failed two?

I like watching him, but it definitely was NOT good press or the game of tennis that they had to explain why he had to give up prize money etc but not get the hammer for the drug tests.
 
By your definition he has star power because he’s one of the reasons I started seriously watching tennis a year ago and even start playing.
My definition is not based on what motivates or pleases you. It's based on what motivates or pleases huge mass audiences.

I wasn't the one who observed that empty seats were visible. I'm merely offering an explanation. Tiafoe and Dimitrov both have their fans. But this is no marquee matchup.
 
Man, that sucks. I was rooting for Tiafoe, but would not have minded a Grigor win, since I like him. It's just a terrible way to end. You want to see a great match, no matter who wins.

What happened? His injury just seemed to come out of nowhere. But, cramps and stiffness/tightness can do that. Just suddenly it comes and it's your hip, hamstring, butt. Looked like he just tightened up. Or more serious? Why didn't he take an MTO?
 
Dude, he is already 33. Remember what happened to Fed after AO2020.

Fred was 38 or 39 at that point with tons tons more matches played and mileage on his body than Dimi is right now.

Although with how much Dimitrov grinds every match and has the same way for the last 10 years, he probably has run the same total distance on court playing a few matches per tournament than Roger had playing to the semis and finals almost every tourney.

Dimi also never had the serve Roger had. The cheap points from aces and unreturned serves after Rog switched to the 97 racquet cannot be understated on how much that extended his career. Rafaalso never developed his serve enough to get aces and cheap points. Novak to his credit has improved his serve as he's gotten older which has helped his body survive the type of game he is known for.
 
Fred was 38 or 39 at that point with tons tons more matches played and mileage on his body than Dimi is right now.

Although with how much Dimitrov grinds every match and has the same way for the last 10 years, he probably has run the same total distance on court playing a few matches per tournament than Roger had playing to the semis and finals almost every tourney.

Dimi also never had the serve Roger had. The cheap points from aces and unreturned serves after Rog switched to the 97 racquet cannot be understated on how much that extended his career. Rafaalso never developed his serve enough to get aces and cheap points. Novak to his credit has improved his serve as he's gotten older which has helped his body survive the type of game he is known for.
Yeah, since 2015 he has fundamentally been a grinder.

His serve is just criminal given his height and frame.
 
That's not star power -- it's entertainment value for the people already there. Star power is what gets people to the match when they have no idea what's going to happen, who's going to win, what the level of play will be, what antics they will witness, etc. It's possible to be both charismatic in person and relatively obscure in the public eye.
Yes agreed. He is more lively on the court and thats bring him supporters
 
Why didn't he take an MTO?

Grigor did take a MTO after the 3rd set ended. He was off the court with a trainer for about 10 minutes before the 4th set started.

They didn't announce what happened and Grigor didn't say anything audible other than when he told his coaches that he couldn't take more than two steps in a row towards a shot. It looked like a hamstring or lower back strain.
 
Grigor did take a MTO after the 3rd set ended. He was off the court with a trainer for about 10 minutes before the 4th set started.

They didn't announce what happened and Grigor didn't say anything audible other than when he told his coaches that he couldn't take more than two steps in a row towards a shot. It looked like a hamstring or lower back strain.
I didn't realize that. I thought he just went for a bathroom break and it was far to the locker room.
 
He was very fortunate against a poor Rublev, his chances of beating an in form Tiafoe and Fritz we're very slim to begin with.
Did you see his quarter final against Alcaraz in Miami? He wiped the floor with Carlos, and Alcaraz was in decent form (having just won IW). Then then played great again to beat Zverev.

Gregor can bring it.

My definition is not based on what motivates or pleases you. It's based on what motivates or pleases huge mass audiences.

I wasn't the one who observed that empty seats were visible. I'm merely offering an explanation. Tiafoe and Dimitrov both have their fans. But this is no marquee matchup.
Ok, but that's only because Tiafoe hasn't actually won anything really big, like a slam. If he won a slam, he would be getting close, and if he won multiple slams he would definitely be a huge star in the USA. He has a good personality, a fun game to watch, and he ticks all the right boxes that people seem to need ticked these days.
 
Man, that sucks. I was rooting for Tiafoe, but would not have minded a Grigor win, since I like him. It's just a terrible way to end. You want to see a great match, no matter who wins.

What happened? His injury just seemed to come out of nowhere. But, cramps and stiffness/tightness can do that. Just suddenly it comes and it's your hip, hamstring, butt. Looked like he just tightened up. Or more serious? Why didn't he take an MTO?

He did take an off court MTO after set 3 was done.

Yea it's weird. He is definitely fragile once he progresses through lots of matches. Against Medvedev at Wimbledon he also injured himself out of nowhere and the match had barely started after steamrolling the draw up to that match. Must be devastating to experience that. One moment you are fine the next you can barely run anymore.
 
Sure.

We're also in one of the most bizarre uncertain transitional periods in tennis in quite some time.

Novak is still a threat to win a slam but not a sure thing to win anymore because age may finally be playing a factor in his career.

Carlitos is mostly consistent but had a weird hiccup this tourney.

Sinner has that weird cloud over him.

Felix disappointing. Tsitsipas, Zverev, might have had their best chances to win a slam already and they're still young.

This might be the new norm now. We just were so used to the Big 3 + Murray consistently getting through the second week of slams and claiming spots in the finals and semis for almost two full decades.


Oh and Ruud is essentially useless off clay.
That wasn't me overhyping Dimitrov based on his rank. Because all those things are true for Tiafoe and Fritz too, and they're still below him. It was more of a negative for them.
 
That wasn't me overhyping Dimitrov based on his rank. Because all those things are true for Tiafoe and Fritz too, and they're still below him. It was more of a negative for them.
If Tiafoe or Fritz win a slam God help us.

It would be better than seeing Ruud winning the French after Novak, Sinner, Alcaraz, Tsitispas all get upset in week 1 and Ruud would beat Nishioka in the Final.
 
If Tiafoe or Fritz win a slam God help us.

It would be better than seeing Ruud winning the French after Novak, Sinner, Alcaraz, Tsitispas all get upset in week 1 and Ruud would beat Nishioka in the Final.
They can do nothing but try. I don't see why it's so terrible. It's not their fault the draw got busted. If Sinner or Med can't stop them (which I fully expect they can), that's on them.

Busted draws happen, flukey winners happen. Not often (and certainly not in a while), but it's not unprecedented. It won't ruin tennis. The top players will still go on to win the vast majority of Slams and everything will be in order in the tennis world.
 
Missed good part of the match because I had to go out, but it seems Dimitrov's leg gave up. Pity, he may not win a slam ever, but I will still root for him next year. All the best to Frances as well.
 
What a shame! Would have loved Dimitrov to make it to a slam final.

I hope Tiafoe makes the final now, I think he's more exciting than Fritz. Unlikely that either of them will win the whole thing - but you never know.
 
Sad way for the match to end. Hope dimi is okay. Huge congrats to Tiafoe though. What a tournament for him and Fritz. We guaranteed an American in the final. This is huge for American tennis and this tournament this week.
 
When you see the way the second set ended, you can see why neither player has gotten the gold. I don't mean to take anything away from either -that second set was the most entertaining, most fun set I have seen this tourney. And the final three DFs were icing on the insane cake.

But imagine any of the big four on the other side of the net - their consistency through the pressure. I thought maybe this time it would be different, that having Foe or Grigor on the other side would have calmed their nerves, but the nerves seem to exist no matter what. It's the occasion, not the opponent.
 
Back
Top