nolefam_2024
Bionic Poster
Yes he is most straight forward person in tennis.I LOVE Medvedev press conferences. Always enjoy listening to him!
Yes he is most straight forward person in tennis.I LOVE Medvedev press conferences. Always enjoy listening to him!
If he plays like he did for this match he will not get past the next one.Well done to Sinner. He is surely the heavy favourite for the title now, if he wasn't before. Of course, this can add extra pressure, but he has shown that he can handle it.
...with a sometimes very interesting game to watch. It'd be nice for him to make the semifinal competitive. Prior to "the incident," I had hoped he'd be a frequent fixture at the end of tournaments.A British teen pop star
Yeah. That's not all that special though. In the last 30 years, 10 different players have ended the year at world number 1. 4 of the 10 have reached 12,000 points, and 3 out of those 4 have reached it multiple times.I already said big 3 and Murray reached there. No one else in last 30 years did
It is specialYeah. That's not all that special though. In the last 30 years, 10 different players have ended the year at world number 1. 4 of the 10 have reached 12,000 points, and 3 out of those 4 have reached it multiple times.
No,,, nobody cares about the smaller tournaments, Slams are where real #1 is determined... Wimbledon and French open is more prestigeous than that aussie open and US open so ,,, Clearly Alcarez is #1 in the world in 2024Hmmm good question. It's almost as if we should devise a point system where bigger tournaments are worth more than the smaller ones, and players get more points the farther they get into each tournament.
yea but Sinner is tainted with that topical PED. so clearly Alcarez is #1...........in the world in 2024. No debating this. Nadal and Federer agree on this.Sinner with 6 titles to Alcaraz' 3.
No,,, nobody cares about the smaller tournaments, Slams are where real #1 is determined... Wimbledon and French open is more prestigeous than that aussie open and US open so ,,, Clearly Alcarez is #1 in the world in 2024![]()
Depends on your definition of "special". Something that's happened, on average, every other year for the last twenty years, isn't that special to me, but to each his own.It is special
Meddy can't do it. You said he and sinner are fairly similar which is where I brought this pt. Meddy is great player but he is not sinner level now.
Who, Sinner? He played really well. The level in this match was extremely high.If he plays like he did for this match he will not get past the next one.
The incident? If you feel like pointing me in the right direction, somehow I know basically zero about Draper....with a sometimes very interesting game to watch. It'd be nice for him to make the semifinal competitive. Prior to "the incident," I had hoped he'd be a frequent fixture at the end of tournaments.
The French is valuable as a major, but hardly more prestigious than the US Open.No,,, nobody cares about the smaller tournaments, Slams are where real #1 is determined... Wimbledon and French open is more prestigeous than that aussie open and US open so ,,, Clearly Alcarez is #1 in the world in 2024![]()
It was an erratic level, rarely extremely high from either guy as I saw it. Some great points and a lot of ok ones.Who, Sinner? He played really well. The level in this match was extremely high.
Some poor sportsmanship playing FAA earlier this summer.The incident? If you feel like pointing me in the right direction, somehow I know basically zero about Draper.
The score says otherwise. It was a race to see who could make the most unforced errors.Who, Sinner? He played really well. The level in this match was extremely high.
Good job from Sinner, against a formidable opponent. Peaking for the QFs might not be the best strategy.The score says otherwise. It was a race to see who could make the most unforced errors.
Man, Jannik hasn't required that level to get to the SF, why should he give it/waste energy? Sense he can bring a better level if needed, were examples in this match. if so, he won't be denied this title.I think Sinner has played a fine match, but his level right now (and really all tournament) has not approached what he produced in Miami and early on during IW. Medvedev, besides the second set, has played way below his norm
True man. Need to win these matches as well as those when playing the best. There should be a mathematical equation to show this element of a great player. I am no mathematician, but here goes:It was an erratic level, rarely extremely high from either guy as I saw it. Some great points and a lot of ok ones.
10330 pts now. 400 removed from indian wells due to doping scandle.He's currently sitting at about 7,400 points for this year. If he got 12,000 by the end of year, then yes, that would be incredible, but he's not on pace to do that. So saying he's much better than Medvedev based on something that could theoretically happen, but is unlikely, isn't a good way of measuring their levels. Bringing up that it hasn't been done very often in "30 years" is extremely misleading. The ATP only changed the point system to make 12,000 points possible in 2009; it was literally impossible to get 12,000 points, even with a perfect season, before then.
How many points will he have if WADA manage to defend their case and get him banned? Would they remove any points with retroactive effect?10330 pts now. 400 removed from indian wells due to doping scandle.
2500 pts left on the table. The race is on.
How many points will he have if WADA manage to defend their case and get him banned? Would they remove any points with retroactive effect?
I don't think wada will be successful now.How many points will he have if WADA manage to defend their case and get him banned? Would they remove any points with retroactive effect?
How on pace is sinner now?He's currently sitting at about 7,400 points for this year. If he got 12,000 by the end of year, then yes, that would be incredible, but he's not on pace to do that. So saying he's much better than Medvedev based on something that could theoretically happen, but is unlikely, isn't a good way of measuring their levels. Bringing up that it hasn't been done very often in "30 years" is extremely misleading. The ATP only changed the point system to make 12,000 points possible in 2009; it was literally impossible to get 12,000 points, even with a perfect season, before then.