Yeah, sometimes it seems to be that fans who grew up with the Big 3 era sort of expect that every generation will have a Big 3 caliber player - like 20+ Slams is an expected standard. But, it really doesn't have to be like that, and it's much more likely that even the best of generation will have a more humanly-scaled Slam total - 7, 9, 12? - which are, less we forget, incredible totals, just not close to the Big 3. Also fans of the young stars seem to get WAY ahead of themselves. Sinner and Alcaraz are great players, obviously, and maybe Sinner and/or Alcaraz do go on to have a dominant 15+ Slam career. But we're not there yet. There's all these proclamations of "just you wait and see." Well, let's truly "just wait and see" and stop bombarding with claims of future expected dominance. Let it play out.