Nostradamus
Bionic Poster
Fonseca to win the aussie open
With the 1R finished, my standout 2R matches:
#18 Hurkacz v Kecmanovic
#21 Shelton v Carreno Busta
#16 Musetti v Shapovalov
Fonseca v Sonego
#26 Machac v Opelka
#15 Draper v Kokkinakis
And then some matches I can definitely see as upsets too:
#13 Rune v Berrettini
#6 Ruud v Mensik
#29 Felix v Davidovich Fokina
#12 Paul v Nishikori
I see a lot of Federer in Fonseca.
I am surprised by those who are surprised, Fonseca in recent weeks had literally annihilated the competition between Next-Gen, Challenger and qualification for this Australian Open, showing a devastating tennis for completeness.
I do not see any apparent defects in him, a mix between the devastating accelerations of Alcaraz and the constant pressure of Sinner's groundstrokes.
But the thing that should scare everyone in view of the future is his incisiveness in service, also this has been underlined several times in the previous weeks.
This result perhaps surprises in proportion but not in the final outcome.
Now he becomes the loose cannon of the tournament, no one can grasp his current limits at the current stage, and this is what should keep many awake at night.
In addition, he also brings with him the Brazilian torcida that certainly guarantees him a superplus in terms of adrenaline.
hi man, yeah pretty special this kid seems, great start of the season for him already, TBH tsitsipas played quite better at that match at uso than rublev today, but then, it was 5 sets, not 3.Basically a reprise of 2021 USO Alcaraz (but with a better serve). Incredible player.
He only played two top 100 players at the Next Gen Finals, winning against #48 Mensik and #20 Fils in five sets each. In the challenger and qualifications, the top player he beat was #99.I am surprised by those who are surprised, Fonseca in recent weeks had literally annihilated the competition between Next-Gen, Challenger and qualification for this Australian Open, showing a devastating tennis for completeness.
It has nothing to do with it, you have to evaluate trend and proportions.He only played two top 100 players at the Next Gen Finals, winning against #48 Mensik and #20 Fils in five sets each. In the challenger and qualifications, the top player he beat was #99.
Straight setting Rublev at a Major is a whole different level. I think a lot of people thought he could do it, but this was in the big leagues against a top player (albeit one who has been struggling).
It has nothing to do with it, you have to evaluate trend and proportions.
Fonseca participated in the Next-Gen with a 145 ranking, he was the worst ranked among all the participants and despite this he dominated the tournament.
In this beginning of 2025 between Challengers and AO qualifiers he had not met any top 100 but he swept them all away, leaving the feeling that he now belonged to a different ionosphere compared to that level, him who last year even at Challenger level did not do great things.
Last year I saw him in Bologna in the Davis Cup and although he left me with good feelings nothing comparable to what he has shown in recent weeks.
He is in full development phase but in the last period he has put the sixth gear by stepping on the accelerator and the results are there for all to see.
His current level is already top 50 if you want to keep it tight, but he could very well already have a top 20 level (what I predicted in the past few days, focus ranking comparable to that of Rune 2022 at the same age) and in a single match as demonstrated today he can already beat even the top 10.
The trend was unmistakable, this is why on the eve many of us said that he could beat Rublev and that should not be surprising.
I repeat, what is surprising is the proportion of the victory, not the victory itself.
agree, i expected him to win, rublev has been in free fall for a long time, i didnt expect straight sets, but to be fair, rublev played very poorly, and fonseca played the best level ive seen from him.It has nothing to do with it, you have to evaluate trend and proportions.
Fonseca participated in the Next-Gen with a 145 ranking, he was the worst ranked among all the participants and despite this he dominated the tournament.
In this beginning of 2025 between Challengers and AO qualifiers he had not met any top 100 but he swept them all away, leaving the feeling that he now belonged to a different ionosphere compared to that level, him who last year even at Challenger level did not do great things.
Last year I saw him in Bologna in the Davis Cup and although he left me with good feelings nothing comparable to what he has shown in recent weeks.
He is in full development phase but in the last period he has put the sixth gear by stepping on the accelerator and the results are there for all to see.
His current level is already top 50 if you want to keep it tight, but he could very well already have a top 20 level (what I predicted in the past few days, focus ranking comparable to that of Rune 2022 at the same age) and in a single match as demonstrated today he can already beat even the top 10.
The trend was unmistakable, this is why on the eve many of us said that he could beat Rublev and that should not be surprising.
I repeat, what is surprising is the proportion of the victory, not the victory itself.
agree, i expected him to win, rublev has been in free fall for a long time, i didnt expect straight sets, but to be fair, rublev played very poorly, and fonseca played the best level ive seen from him.
That's fair.I think he's a great person off court.
Is Brooksby considering joining a band?Is Brooksby playing with that new 10-JX!??? Looks like he switched.... anyone have any details??
Does that mean his future match threads will be 90% "OMG, he's playing terribly!!!!" before he wins in straight sets?I see a lot of Federer in Fonseca.
i dont know, ive seen a good level from him over the years and today to me he was pretty bland, sure, he could keep his serve most of the time, but thats not a lot to ask to a top 10 with a good serve plus 1 against an 18 year old in his first slam matchI thought Rublev actually played pretty well on his serve for most of the match. Except for the drop in form in the beginning of the 2nd set.
But that's my point. He didn't dominate the Next Gen tournament. He was extended to five sets against the two best players he played, with the match against Mensik featuring five tiebreakers. I'm on board the Fonseca train and expected him to win against Rublev, but his play today to win in straight sets was another couple of rungs higher than what he showed in Jeddah.It has nothing to do with it, you have to evaluate trend and proportions.
Fonseca participated in the Next-Gen with a 145 ranking, he was the worst ranked among all the participants and despite this he dominated the tournament.
He only played two top 100 players at the Next Gen Finals, winning against #48 Mensik and #20 Fils in five sets each. In the challenger and qualifications, the top player he beat was #99.
Straight setting Rublev at a Major is a whole different level. I think a lot of people thought he could do it, but this was in the big leagues against a top player (albeit one who has been struggling).
He won all 5 matches in Jeddah, including the semi-final and the one-sided final.But that's my point. He didn't dominate the Next Gen tournament. He was extended to five sets against the two best players he played, with the match against Mensik featuring five tiebreakers. I'm on board the Fonseca train and expected him to win against Rublev, but his play today to win in straight sets was another couple of rungs higher than what he showed in Jeddah.
Oh yeah, on that point we 100% agree. This will be fun to watch.The point is that Fonseca from Jeddah onwards is growing tournament after tournament.
i dont know, ive seen a good level from him over the years and today to me he was pretty bland, sure, he could keep his serve most of the time, but thats not a lot to ask to a top 10 with a good serve plus 1 against an 18 year old in his first slam match
But that's my point. He didn't dominate the Next Gen tournament. He was extended to five sets against the two best players he played, with the match against Mensik featuring five tiebreakers. I'm on board the Fonseca train and expected him to win against Rublev, but his play today to win in straight sets was another couple of rungs higher than what he showed in Jeddah.
When Alcaraz won it in 2021, he only dropped one set while Fonseca lost 6 sets, including being extended to five sets twice.Good Lord man ... Next Gen is Fast 4 format with no ad scoring. What do you expect in that format ???
Yeah thats true also, Fonseca served amazing, but he was clearly better off the ground tooThe thing is, Fonseca up until the third set was also serving well. Ended up with 14 aces (one more than Rublev) serving 73% 1st seve. And it was higher in the first 1 sets. His serve only took a dip in the 3rd set. I think that's a bit of the reason. It wasn't a match of many long rallies.
Monfils won the first two sets, had match points in the third set, ended up losing sets 3-4, but pulled it out in five.What happened in the Monfils match?
What happened in the Monfils match?
Winning all matches in a tournament is not called dominating lol you have to do that in most tournaments to even win lolHe won all 5 matches in Jeddah, including the semi-final and the one-sided final.
If that's not dominating.
Moreover, Fils is the same one who had closed 2024 strong by entering the top 20, and Mensik had also impressed in the end of the season.
The point is that Fonseca from Jeddah onwards is growing tournament after tournament.
His mother has.The kid has a great taste!
That's exactly what I thought.
Not me, sorry.I see a lot of Federer in Fonseca.
Yep..Not me, sorry.
More similar to Djokovic:
- not using a 1HBH (essential in terms of form/aestetics)
- not enough at net to paint a similar game
- upper body OK, lower body without the perfect shape of Federer's; I see weaknesses there which will not take him to 20 GSs
Future great, I agree, but him liking Fed doesn't make him similar to Fed.
@GRASScarazWho was it that was saying Rublev is gonna win it this year?
Yes I also don’t see it except for the aggression. He is more robust SUV in the lower body. More like Wawrinka than FedNot me, sorry.
More similar to Djokovic:
- not using a 1HBH (essential in terms of form/aestetics)
- not enough at net to paint a similar game
- upper body OK, lower body without the perfect shape of Federer's; I see weaknesses there which will not take him to 20 GSs
Future great, I agree, but him liking Fed doesn't make him similar to Fed.
I liked the kid, but didn't remind me of him. I slept at 1-3 on the third set. Did he show touch?Fonseca is playing attacking tennis better than most. In a way, he's Federesque.
He reminded me a little bit more of Thiem than him.I see a lot of Federer in Fonseca.