chjtennis
G.O.A.T.
Not me, sorry.
More similar to Djokovic:
- not using a 1HBH (essential in terms of form/aestetics)
- not enough at net to paint a similar game
- upper body OK, lower body without the perfect shape of Federer's; I see weaknesses there which will not take him to 20 GSs
Future great, I agree, but him liking Fed doesn't make him similar to Fed.
His approach is quite different from Djokovic. Djokovic tends to stay at the back way more. Fonseca always looks to kill it with a winner like Federer used to. Federer used to breeze past through early rounds quickly like no one else, it was common for him to end matches within 2 hours in the early rounds of slams. Fonseca is an aggressive attacking player like Roger and doesn't stay at the back of the court until 10th shot during rallies. No 2 players are exactly the same, even Fed and Dimi are very different, and Fonseca is not exactly the same as either Federer or Djokovic. However, the way he approaches and constructs each point is closer to Federer than Djokovic. Fonseca puts way more power on ground strokes than both Federer and Djokovic, so there's already a significant difference, but if Federer played with 2-handed backhand like he preferred, the similarities might have seemed more obvious. But no 2 players can be exactly the same. Even though Wawrinka plays 1-handed BH, he doesn't quite play like Federer. He plays longer rallies.