2025 Indian wells ATP master's 1000 SF - (2) Carlos Alcaraz Garfia [SPN] v/s (13) Jack Draper [Great Britain]

Win Predictor Poll


  • Total voters
    6
  • Poll closed .
How is he lucky? I mean, he has been winning big since he was 18... He has winning head to head against tiafoe... Sinner.... Two wimbledon finals won agaisnt djokovic... Just because he isnt a defensive player who focuses on not missing he isnt lucky, he goes for his shots and when he makes them, he normally wins, you dont call him unlucky when he loses, you oportunistic troll, now go tell him change his team after a 6-0 bagel...
Carlos could still very lose this match 1-6 2-6 in the third
 
Carlos could still very lose this match 1-6 2-6
Doesnt change a thing about what i said, this is the way he is, a different coach aint gonna erase those dips in level suddenly, thats inherent in him, he probably still gonna win more than 99 percent of the tour, you want him to be perfect but hes not, you got sinner for that, but then he doesnt play this brand of tennis, your choice
 
Refute what I said then. His 2 slam wins last year were more LUCK than they were dominant. Actually they were two of the weakest slam wins in the last 10-15 years
No-one's going to refute your shiiiiiet because it's always trolling and you never converse in good faith lol.
Enjoy the match, I wonder who will get lucky today :laughing:
 
Well i think at the end was a fair call to give drapper that point but layanis scream could have had an impact on carlos point, if youre not 100% sure dont stop the point, you would think the best umpire in the world for years would know that
 
Sounds like you hate the truth. FACT tiafoe should have beat him at Wimbledon and he’s lucky he got by sinner or Zverev. Again. Neither slam was impressive at all. The last great impressive win he had was wiMbledon 2 years ago
I don't think you know what "fact".means and look at Sinner's opponents in his last two slams wins if you want to talk about luck.
 
Alcaraz said it didn't hinder him when he missed the ball. Better sportsmanship than Draper might deserve.
I imagine if Alcaraz said the call hindered him they would have replayed it.
I'm pretty sure I heard Draper say "he was nowhere near the ball" when asking for the 2nd video review. Which was clearly not true considering Carlos got a racket on the ball.
 
umpire panicked for making the bad call in the first place and went the other extreme :-D

Yeah. If I were Alcaraz and thought there was the slightest chance I missed because of the bad call, I would have protested.

He might end up feeling pretty stupid about it if he loses the match because of that game.
 
Hard to believe but rune is now the favorite to win this title and maybe sweep the clay season. At least until sinner returns. Draper and Carlos are will lose if they keep this level up in the final
 
Someone please explain what was wrong. I had no volume but saw it all. What was the supposed problem?

The umpire wrongly called double bounce when Draper hit a shot. Alcaraz missed the next shot.

Draper asked for video review to prove it was a single bounce, then asked for another video review to prove he should win the point. He ended up winning the point after these two video reviews.
 
Back
Top