2025 Miami Open thread

Who will win Miami Open?


  • Total voters
    80
First, Alcaraz was three months older than Fonz at this point in 2022. Also, his ranking was half of what Fonz's ranking is now. Third, using Alcaraz as a metric for anything is absurd. He is exceptionally precocious.
You are right Raz is slightly ahead at same age but not enough. If he can do it at 18 then Fonseca has chance as well.

Fonseca is ranked 60 today.

At similar age best players were ranked like this.

Federer 50
Nadal 50
Djokovic 80
Murray 62
Alcaraz 33
Sinner 80
 
You're worse than @Winner Sinner. Fonz in the poll? Puleezee...
You can't argue with those who include Fonseca in the poll regarding the possible winners, if you are the same one who has been repeating for weeks that the two Canadians are legitimate candidates for the next slams (lol).

At least Fonseca, in addition to being an absurd talent, has the unpredictability of his 18 years, and currently boasts a streak of 21 victories in the last 25 matches played

Go and look at the bookmakers' odds regarding the next Wimbledon.
A possible triumph of Fonseca is quoted much less than a possible victory of Shapovalov.
Now in this world only you and @Rosstour are the only ones left to give credit to Shapovalov.
Not even Shapovalov believes in Shapovalov anymore.

Are you betting that Fonseca will win an important title before "your" Shapovalov?

In fact, would you bet that by the end of Shapovalov's career, you and I will have won the same major titles as the Canadian?
 
You can't argue with those who include Fonseca in the poll regarding the possible winners, if you are the same one who has been repeating for weeks that the two Canadians are legitimate candidates for the next slams (lol).

At least Fonseca, in addition to being an absurd talent, has the unpredictability of his 18 years, and currently boasts a streak of 21 victories in the last 25 matches played

Go and look at the bookmakers' odds regarding the next Wimbledon.
A possible triumph of Fonseca is quoted much less than a possible victory of Shapovalov.
Now in this world only you and @Rosstour are the only ones left to give credit to Shapovalov.
Not even Shapovalov believes in Shapovalov anymore.

Are you betting that Fonseca will win an important title before "your" Shapovalov?

In fact, would you bet that by the end of Shapovalov's career, you and I will have won the same major titles as the Canadian?

Shapo in the same boat as the others.

He can win a Slam if he finds himself in a Final against someone not in the B3
 
You can't argue with those who include Fonseca in the poll regarding the possible winners, if you are the same one who has been repeating for weeks that the two Canadians are legitimate candidates for the next slams (lol).

At least Fonseca, in addition to being an absurd talent, has the unpredictability of his 18 years, and currently boasts a streak of 21 victories in the last 25 matches played

Go and look at the bookmakers' odds regarding the next Wimbledon.
A possible triumph of Fonseca is quoted much less than a possible victory of Shapovalov.
Now in this world only you and @Rosstour are the only ones left to give credit to Shapovalov.
Not even Shapovalov believes in Shapovalov anymore.

Are you betting that Fonseca will win an important title before "your" Shapovalov?

In fact, would you bet that by the end of Shapovalov's career, you and I will have won the same major titles as the Canadian?

First, he's not "my" Shapo. I like Shapo's game, but I'm not convinced he is winning a big title. Talented, but he's a bit of a headcase. Be happy if he does. (Félix is a different story)

But the point about whether he is a contender for this title is different from whether he should be included in the poll. No, I would not include him in the poll (he is not a leading contender, he is not top 10, and he isn't coming in off a great run in IW).

Could he come out swinging and have a great run? Sure. Same for Fonseca. But they're not leading contenders.

Berrettini is also in that boat, by the way.
 
You are right Raz is slightly ahead at same age but not enough. If he can do it at 18 then Fonseca has chance as well.

Fonseca is ranked 60 today.

At similar age best players were ranked like this.

Federer 50
Nadal 50
Djokovic 80
Murray 62
Alcaraz 33
Sinner 80

And how many of them were winning M1000s?
 
GmRpRUBWsAEMBNl


Lol
 
Moutet has a qualifier, and then a clay courter (Talibo) and the struggling Ruud in his section. I like it! (which means he will lose to the qualifier)

At similar age best players were ranked like this.

Federer 50
Nadal 50
Djokovic 80
Murray 62
Alcaraz 33
Sinner 80
Ha, you have Murray in there! I needed a good laugh.
 
Why do they call it the Miami Open instead of Miami Masters?
Do any of the other Masters do this?
 
Why do they call it the Miami Open instead of Miami Masters?
Do any of the other Masters do this?
Indian Wells official title is BNP Paribas Open

Cincinnati Open
 
First, he's not "my" Shapo. I like Shapo's game, but I'm not convinced he is winning a big title. Talented, but he's a bit of a headcase. Be happy if he does. (Félix is a different story)

But the point about whether he is a contender for this title is different from whether he should be included in the poll. No, I would not include him in the poll (he is not a leading contender, he is not top 10, and he isn't coming in off a great run in IW).

Could he come out swinging and have a great run? Sure. Same for Fonseca. But they're not leading contenders.

Berrettini is also in that boat, by the way.
No he isn't your shapo because he's my shapo. He didn't have a great run at IW because conditions didn't suit him very well and he hit Alcaraz in his second round and conditions did suit him. Two titles in the last little while mean something.
 
No he isn't your shapo because he's my shapo. He didn't have a great run at IW because conditions didn't suit him very well and he hit Alcaraz in his second round and conditions did suit him. Two titles in the last little while mean something.

Lol, Canadians never get peeved until someone else starts claiming their stuff, eh?
 
All I have is a poorly translated from Russian video as proof, but supposedly Karen K said the Dunlop ATP balls (haven’t seen them since WTF) in Miami are “much different” than IW. What that means I have no idea.

If anyone gets further information please post it.
 
Carlos celebrates every winner so hard to keep the Vamos momentum going that when he looses a few points - that good mojo that he’s putting out takes a hit and he becomes vulnerable.
 
Great Cinà, not even cramps prevented him from winning his first match on the major circuit (and what a match, considering we're talking about a 1000).

Regardless of the undisputed technical quantities (he has an enchanting backhand), what I like about this guy is his character, calm but at the same time never giving up.
On Sunday he was in Greece playing the final in a Challenger, 3 days later despite the trip and tiredness he beats a top 70 player.

Now the challenge with Dimitrov, regardless all useful in his baggage of experience after having just reached the first final in a Challenger.
As already said Sinner 2019 vibes.
Without putting too much pressure on him, I would be surprised if in a few years he hadn't become the second best Italian tennis player after Sinner.
 
Federico Cinà beats Comesana on debut: first career success in the Masters 1000 and major circuit and also the first 2007 to win a match at a level of this magnitude

Federico Cinà wrote the first important page of his young career today, conquering his first victory on the major ATP circuit. The 17-year-old from Palermo beat the Argentine Francisco Comesana with the score of 7-6(4) 7-6(2) in the first round of the Miami Masters 1000, demonstrating the character and technical qualities of a true champion.
“LIKE IN A DREAM!” could be the perfect summary of the historic day experienced by the young Sicilian talent. Cinà faced the match with the determination and maturity of a veteran, despite the understandable emotion of his debut on such a prestigious stage.
Federico also becomes the first tennis player born in 2007 to win a match in a Masters 1000.

In the first set, the Italian tennis player immediately showed his qualities, obtaining a break at the beginning and going up 2-0. Despite the counterbreak suffered at 3-3, Cinà kept calm in the decisive moments, also canceling a set point when he was serving at 5-6. At 6-6, the tiebreak was reached, where the Italian made the difference thanks to an ace and an excellent backhand down the line winner, closing 7-4 with a first serve winner.
The second set followed a similar script, with alternating phases. The turning point came at 2-1 for Cinà, when the Sicilian placed a break showing extraordinary defense, recovering two smashes from his opponent before closing with a backhand passing shot in advance and then taking the lead to 4-1. At 5-2, the Sicilian also had a match point on the return, but Comesana managed to save himself.
The tension played a nasty trick on Cinà who, in the next game, lost his serve with a double fault while serving for the match. To further complicate matters, the 17-year-old began to suffer from cramps in his left leg, requiring a medical timeout at 6-5.
Despite the physical problem, the Palermo native found the energy to face the second tiebreak of the day. Here the Argentine dominated with an aggressive and precise game: a double fault by Comesana, followed by excellent forehand returns by the Italian, brought Cinà to 6-2. The final point was a masterpiece: a spectacular inside-in forehand winner that closed the match at 7-6(2).

In the second round, Federico Cinà will face a very high level challenge against the Bulgarian Grigor Dimitrov, seeded number 9 of the tournament and currently number 15 in the world ranking. The 33-year-old Dimitrov, 191 cm tall, will represent a tough test to measure the level of the young Italian against a player with great experience on the circuit.
At just 17 years old, the Sicilian is confirming the great expectations placed on him, demonstrating that he possesses a complete and mature tennis. His strengths that emerged in this match were his effective service in crucial moments, with several aces to save him from complicated situations, and a backhand down the line that often put the Argentine in difficulty.
 
Federico Cinà beats Comesana on debut: first career success in the Masters 1000 and major circuit and also the first 2007 to win a match at a level of this magnitude

Federico Cinà wrote the first important page of his young career today, conquering his first victory on the major ATP circuit. The 17-year-old from Palermo beat the Argentine Francisco Comesana with the score of 7-6(4) 7-6(2) in the first round of the Miami Masters 1000, demonstrating the character and technical qualities of a true champion.
“LIKE IN A DREAM!” could be the perfect summary of the historic day experienced by the young Sicilian talent. Cinà faced the match with the determination and maturity of a veteran, despite the understandable emotion of his debut on such a prestigious stage.
Federico also becomes the first tennis player born in 2007 to win a match in a Masters 1000.

In the first set, the Italian tennis player immediately showed his qualities, obtaining a break at the beginning and going up 2-0. Despite the counterbreak suffered at 3-3, Cinà kept calm in the decisive moments, also canceling a set point when he was serving at 5-6. At 6-6, the tiebreak was reached, where the Italian made the difference thanks to an ace and an excellent backhand down the line winner, closing 7-4 with a first serve winner.
The second set followed a similar script, with alternating phases. The turning point came at 2-1 for Cinà, when the Sicilian placed a break showing extraordinary defense, recovering two smashes from his opponent before closing with a backhand passing shot in advance and then taking the lead to 4-1. At 5-2, the Sicilian also had a match point on the return, but Comesana managed to save himself.
The tension played a nasty trick on Cinà who, in the next game, lost his serve with a double fault while serving for the match. To further complicate matters, the 17-year-old began to suffer from cramps in his left leg, requiring a medical timeout at 6-5.
Despite the physical problem, the Palermo native found the energy to face the second tiebreak of the day. Here the Argentine dominated with an aggressive and precise game: a double fault by Comesana, followed by excellent forehand returns by the Italian, brought Cinà to 6-2. The final point was a masterpiece: a spectacular inside-in forehand winner that closed the match at 7-6(2).

In the second round, Federico Cinà will face a very high level challenge against the Bulgarian Grigor Dimitrov, seeded number 9 of the tournament and currently number 15 in the world ranking. The 33-year-old Dimitrov, 191 cm tall, will represent a tough test to measure the level of the young Italian against a player with great experience on the circuit.
At just 17 years old, the Sicilian is confirming the great expectations placed on him, demonstrating that he possesses a complete and mature tennis. His strengths that emerged in this match were his effective service in crucial moments, with several aces to save him from complicated situations, and a backhand down the line that often put the Argentine in difficulty.
Stop with the bolded article copy pasta. STOP.
 
Back
Top