2025 Next Gen ATP Finals, Jeddah, 17-21 December

Who wins the 2025 Next Gen ATP Finals?

  • Alexander Blockx

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Martín Landaluce

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Nicolai Budkov Kjær

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Rafael Jódar

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Rei Sakamoto (alternate)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Justin Engel (alternate)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    13
  • Poll closed .
The next edition of the Next Gen ATP Sportswashing Finals in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia will take place in a few weeks' time from December 17-21.
1080x360



Qualification
According to the event website, "The PIF ATP Live Race To Jeddah will end on Monday, 10 November 2025." So we should already know who has qualified, but confusingly the ATP has only just started announcing qualified players, and the Live Race to Jeddah page is, confusingly, still updating with current results. So who knows? Last year the race ended on December 2, so perhaps the event website is simply wrong.

The top contenders are clearly going to be Mensik and Tien. Last year, Mensik went 0-3 in a group that included finalists Fonseca and Tien, but this year he leads the field, having been the most successful out of the Next Gen in winning a Masters 1000 title in Miami. Tien and Fonseca also picked up their first titles (Fonseca winning 250 Buenos Aires and 500 Basel, Tien winning 250 Metz). Last year's participant Nishesh Basavareddy is in contention to compete again; Shang Juncheng is also eligible age-wise but has dropped down the rankings following foot surgery.

Last year's champion Fonseca (featured prominently on the poster above) would have been eligible to defend his title, but has withdrawn "as he continues to recover from an injury sustained at the end of the 2025 ATP Tour season". Interestingly, he is due to play in an exhibition before the event takes place, the "2025 Miami Tennis Invitational". :unsure:

EDIT. The full field has now been confirmed.

Confirmed Players
1. Jakub Menšík (20)
2. João Fonseca (19)
3. Learner Tien (19)
4. Alexander Blockx (20)
5. Dino Prižmić (20)
6. Martín Landaluce (19)
7. Nicolai Budkov Kjær (19)
8. Nishesh Basavareddy (20)
9. Rafael Jódar (19)

Alternates/ next players in line according to the current version of the Live Race to Jeddah page:
10. Rei Sakamoto (19)
11. Justin Engel (18)

Mensik and Tien are already well-known names; will any of the others join them over the years?

Rules and Innovations
EDIT.
These are now available for this edition:

Scoring

- First-to-4, Best-of-5 set scoring: Each match shall be the best of 5 tie-break sets. Each set shall be first to 4 games with a margin of 2 games and a tie-break (first to 7 points with a margin of 2) played at 3-3. Each game shall be played using the No-Ad scoring format with the Server choosing the service box.

Changeovers

- There will be no change of ends after the first game.
- Players will change ends and sit down for 90 seconds after the first three games are played, once more if the set score reaches 3:2 (i.e., after two more games in the set), and then again at the end of the set (regardless of the final set score).
- Players will change ends after every six points in the tie-break.
- Players will sit down at the end of the set for 90 seconds, reduced from 120 seconds.

Rules initiatives


- Warm-up: Players will warm up for 3 minutes on court.
- Ball change: After every 7 games.
- Serve Shot Clock: Up to 8 seconds will be permitted between first and second serve. A shot clock will display the time elapsed between the first and second serve.
- Time between Points: The time between points will be reduced from 25 seconds to 15 seconds if a point is below three shots (e.g., 2 shots = 15 seconds; 3 shots = 25 seconds).
- Free Fan Movement: Free movement will be allowed in the stadium for the first three games of the match. After the first free games, fans will be allowed to move freely except for limited areas behind the baseline in direct player view. Movement by a spectator(s) in the designated free movement areas shall not constitute a legitimate pause in the shot clock.
- Umpire Chair: A lower umpire chair will be continued to be used to reduce the visual obstruction for fans in the arena.

Innovation initiatives

In-arena data analytics: more match statistics and analytics will be available to fans, players and coaches than ever before. The following data will be shown in the arena:
- Traditional tennis statistics including aces, serve percentages, break point performance
- Player performance based upon rally length
- Player Shot Quality broken down by Serve, Return, Forehand, Backhand and Movement.
- Match Insights data detailing which Player has been “In Attack” the most, who has won more points when attacking (“Conversion Score”) and who has won the most points when defending (“Steal Score”)

The data will also be available to the players’ coaches courtside via the ATP’s performance analytics platform, ATP Tennis IQ Powered by PIF, as well as the provision of video footage tagged with match data available post-match.
 
Last edited:
The next edition of the Next Gen ATP Sportswashing Finals in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia will take place in a few weeks' time from December 17-21.
1080x360



Qualification
According to the event website, "The PIF ATP Live Race To Jeddah will end on Monday, 10 November 2025." So we should already know who has qualified, but confusingly the ATP has only just started announcing qualified players, and the Live Race to Jeddah page is, confusingly, still updating with current results. So who knows? Last year the race ended on December 2, so perhaps the event website is simply wrong.

The top contenders are clearly going to be Mensik and Tien. Last year, Mensik went 0-3 in a group that included finalists Fonseca and Tien, but this year he leads the field, having been the most successful out of the Next Gen in winning a Masters 1000 title in Miami. Tien and Fonseca also picked up their first titles (Fonseca winning 250 Buenos Aires and 500 Basel, Tien winning 250 Metz). Last year's participant Nishesh Basavareddy is in contention to compete again; Shang Juncheng is also eligible age-wise but has dropped down the rankings following foot surgery.

Last year's champion Fonseca (featured prominently on the poster above) would have been eligible to defend his title, but has withdrawn "as he continues to recover from an injury sustained at the end of the 2025 ATP Tour season". Interestingly, he is due to play in an exhibition before the event takes place, the "2025 Miami Tennis Invitational". :unsure:

EDIT. The full field has now been confirmed.

Confirmed Players
1. Jakub Menšík (20)
2. João Fonseca (19)
3. Learner Tien (19)
4. Alexander Blockx (20)
5. Dino Prizmic (20)
6. Martin Landaluce (19)
7. Nicolai Budkov Kjaer (19)
8. Nishesh Basavareddy (20)
9. Rafael Jodar (19)

Alternates/ next players in line according to the current version of the Live Race to Jeddah page:
10. Rei Sakamoto (19)
11. Justin Engel (18)

Mensik and Tien are already well-known names; will any of the others join them over the years?

Rules
I could not find any information about new rule innovations. These are the rules from the 2024 edition.

Scoring:
- First-to-4, Best-of-5 set scoring: Each match shall be the best of 5 tie-break sets. Each set shall be first to 4 games with a margin of 2 games and a tie-break (first to 7 points with a margin of 2) played at 3-3. Each game shall be played using the No-Ad scoring format with the server choosing the service box.

Changeovers:
- There will be no change of ends after the first game.
- Players will change ends and sit down for 90 seconds after the first three games are played, once more if the set score reaches 3-2 (i.e., after two more games in the set), and then again at the end of the set (regardless of the final set score).
- Players will change ends after every six points in the tie-break.
- Players will sit down at the end of the set for 90 seconds, reduced from 120 seconds.

Rules initiatives:
- Warm up: Players will warm up for 3 minutes on court.
- Ball change: After every 7 games.
- Serve Shot Clock: Up to 8 seconds will be permitted between first and second serve. A shot clock will display the time elapsed between the first and second serve.
- Time between Points: Continuing with the 2023 initiative, the time between points will be reduced from 25 seconds to 15 seconds if a point is below three shots (e.g., 2 shots = 15 seconds; 3 shots = 25 seconds).
- No Let Rule: Play continues even if the ball touches the net during a serve, provided it lands in the correct service box.
- Free Fan Movement: Free movement will be allowed in the stadium for the first three games of the match. After the first free games, fans will be allowed to move freely except for limited areas behind the baseline in direct player view.
- Movement by a spectator(s) in the designated free movement areas shall not constitute a legitimate pause in the shot clock.
- Umpire Chair: Lower umpire chair to reduce the visual obstruction for fans in the arena.

Innovation iniatives:
- Scoreboards: Simplified scoring graphics for improved fan consumption will be visualised in the arena to educate younger audiences that attend the event.

Player performance initiatives:
- Wearables: Players will be able to wear wearable devices in matches. The wearable data will be summarised and visualised so that players can gain a comprehensive overview of their physical performance and stress responses in matches.
- In-Match analytics: The Tennis IQ match data platform will be available to coaches sitting courtside, and video footage tagged with the match data will be available post-match. New insights will also be visualised in the arena.

Is this a little later than most years? I feel like it's usually played a week or two after the YEC? :unsure:
 
The field has now been confirmed. Jakub Mensik, Learner Tien, Alexander Blockx, Dino Prizmic, Martin Landaluce, Nicolai Budkov Kjaer, Nishesh Basavareddy and Jodar will compete. OP has been updated.
Interesting, I know only 4 of these players. Who’s the most promising out of Blockx, Landaluce, Kjaer and Jodar?
 
Interesting, I know only 4 of these players. Who’s the most promising out of Blockx, Landaluce, Kjaer and Jodar?
I don't think I've seen any of them play. But here are articles about them from the ATP:




 
Joao has robbed us of a Tienseca final
No NextGen champion has ever shown up to defend his title. In the past, it was due either to age, or to the player actually playing in the ATP Finals (which used to be in the week following the NextGen at the beginning).

But I guess that João decided that there was not much upside to playing this event given that he has already won it. If he wins, it doesn't add much to his resume, and I guess he already has sufficient endorsements that the prize money doesn't add that much incentive. And if he doesn't win, it only feels as though he's gone backwards.

Probably it will become tradition that the champion doesn't try to defend, unless they significantly increase the incentives (e.g. ranking points), which they probably won't do.
 
It seems odd to have players succeed at the highest level and then drop down to a glorified junior tournament.
The tournament was founded at a time when there was a dearth of young players coming through. In some sense, the tournament started at the wrong time, because just as they brought it in (in 2017), young players started coming through, with Zverev in the top 10 and playing the ATP Tour Finals instead of the inaugural NextGen finals (for which he would have qualified).

But nonetheless, the tournament seems to have gained in prestige, perhaps particular through Sinner and Alcaraz being former champions. It does seem a little strange for Menšík to be playing this as a Masters Champion and top 20 player, and to a lesser degree for Tien as well. I guess it means that they do want this title.
 
It seems odd to have players succeed at the highest level and then drop down to a glorified junior tournament.
Aside from the dumb location, I think it's a nice little event. We are now in the "off season," so an event of this level seems just right for this time of year.

And these guys aren't nobodies, so calling it a glorified junior tournament is misplaced. These are adults and pros. Plus, if you look at soccer, the big U-19 and U-21 international competitions are pretty well followed, and nobody criticizes players for participating, even if they play for top tier clubs.
 
I mean glorified junior in the sense that they seem to want to hold them at a lower level a bit longer. If they have already arrived at the next level there is no need to go back.

If they had this back in the day guys like Borg, Wilander, Chang and Becker would be playing it for years.
 
I mean glorified junior in the sense that they seem to want to hold them at a lower level a bit longer. If they have already arrived at the next level there is no need to go back.

If they had this back in the day guys like Borg, Wilander, Chang and Becker would be playing it for years.
I'm not sure what you mean by "level"? It's just a sort of separate event (due to age restriction), but it's still an ATP event.

It's meant to showcase young players from the tour, and they are all free to 'move on' and pull out if they don't think it helps them.
 
Ok, then define it for me. And then explain how this is a lower level for these guys.
If someone asked you what level you were you wouldn't know what they mean?

These guys also don't face the best players which they probably already have on the main tour.

They play to four games.

It's a step back or a lower level if you can wrap your head around that word.
 
Aside from the dumb location, I think it's a nice little event. We are now in the "off season," so an event of this level seems just right for this time of year.

And these guys aren't nobodies, so calling it a glorified junior tournament is misplaced. These are adults and pros. Plus, if you look at soccer, the big U-19 and U-21 international competitions are pretty well followed, and nobody criticizes players for participating, even if they play for top tier clubs.
So what’s with the kiddie four game sets?
 
If someone asked you what level you were you wouldn't know what they mean?

These guys also don't face the best players which they probably already have on the main tour.

They play to four games.

It's a step back or a lower level if you can wrap your head around that word.
Not sure what your deal is, but you are struggling with basic communication.

What is my level? With regard to what? Tennis? Like my UTR rating or my USTA rating? Sure, I could put a number on that. Then what?

The level these guys play at is called 'ATP main tour', and they are all there at that level, the highest tennis level in the world.

Some of these guys are already among the best players in the world. One of the won a M1000 this year, and another is top 30. The rest are either top 150, or very close. Those are the best players in the world.

Or would you say that them playing qualifiers for a GS is a "step back," because they will not face top 100 guys?

This isn't a lower level or a step back, it's merely a selection among players AT that level based on age.
 
Not sure what your deal is, but you are struggling with basic communication.

What is my level? With regard to what? Tennis? Like my UTR rating or my USTA rating? Sure, I could put a number on that. Then what?

The level these guys play at is called 'ATP main tour', and they are all there at that level, the highest tennis level in the world.

Some of these guys are already among the best players in the world. One of the won a M1000 this year, and another is top 30. The rest are either top 150, or very close. Those are the best players in the world.

Or would you say that them playing qualifiers for a GS is a "step back," because they will not face top 100 guys?

This isn't a lower level or a step back, it's merely a selection among players AT that level based on age.
It's a lower level because the field is weaker...

They play on the ATP tour but this is not one of those events.
 
It's a lower level because the field is weaker...

They play on the ATP tour but this is not one of those events.
You know that Djokovic just played a 250 event, right? He even ripped his shirt off when he won.

You know that plenty of top 50 players play in challenger events during the year, right?

The depth and quality of this field isn't that poor. I don't see why you are so against it.
 
It's a lower level because the field is weaker...

They play on the ATP tour but this is not one of those events.
By your logic, people should never play a non-GS event ever again once they've played in a Grand Slam. That's not really how it works, is it?

The field has two top 30 players, and otherwise players outside of the top 100. So it's clearly not the hardest field - but it's also not that bad. In particular because these players are young players, likely on their way up, so they may actually be playing better than their ranking.

The event is for the best players up to a certain age. You may feel that Learner and Jakub should be past playing in it, but clearly there is some pride in it for them to try and win it. At least they are both playing, so it is not as though there is one player who is head and shoulders above everybody else. Plus, one of the other young players could have a breakthrough and surprise us.
 
So what’s with the kiddie four game sets?
Why "kiddie"? The Bo5 4-game set format just changes the dynamics somewhat, but I don't see why it would be less taxing. The number of games required for a straight-set victory is actually the same as in a normal Bo3 match. Perhaps it levels things up a little, because holding serve three times in the row gets you at least a tie-break, and it also maybe avoids things getting quite as boring if there is a mis-match in levels.
 
By your logic, people should never play a non-GS event ever again once they've played in a Grand Slam. That's not really how it works, is it?

The field has two top 30 players, and otherwise players outside of the top 100. So it's clearly not the hardest field - but it's also not that bad. In particular because these players are young players, likely on their way up, so they may actually be playing better than their ranking.

The event is for the best players up to a certain age. You may feel that Learner and Jakub should be past playing in it, but clearly there is some pride in it for them to try and win it. At least they are both playing, so it is not as though there is one player who is head and shoulders above everybody else. Plus, one of the other young players could have a breakthrough and surprise us.
No. That's your interpretation of my logic.
 
I don’t understand why this is done so close to the necessary travel to prep for the Australian open?
Like do this in October during the week before Turin finals.
 
That's a shame about Menšík. Do you think he is genuinely injured, or did he just decide against participating in the end?

Now Tien is the overwhelming favourite in the field, which is a bit of a double-edged sword in my opinion. If he wins the tournament, he will just be fulfilling expectations, whereas if he loses, it will be seen as a disappointment. Will he stay in or also pull out? We'll see!
 
Is justin engel any good?
Engel impressed on home soil in 2025. He beat countryman Jan-Lennard Struff at the ATP 500 in Hamburg and advanced to the quarter-finals in Stuttgart. The German became the second-youngest player since 1990 to win a tour-level match (excluding Davis Cup) on all three surfaces: hard, clay and grass. Only Rafael Nadal accomplished the feat at a younger age, doing so at 17 years, two months.

He also won his first ATP Challenger Tour title in Hamburg, where he defeated Federico Cina in the final. The 18-year-old is the first player born in 2007 to triumph on the Challenger Tour.

 
Back
Top