roysid
Legend
Great chance for everyone other than Iga this time at RG.Sabalenka leads Iga by more than 4000 points in the rankings to be published on Monday.
Coco couldn’t reach #2, she needed to win today to do that.
Great chance for everyone other than Iga this time at RG.Sabalenka leads Iga by more than 4000 points in the rankings to be published on Monday.
Coco couldn’t reach #2, she needed to win today to do that.
I really find her a notch above the field.Sabalenka has a real chance in Paris.
The loudest challenge alsoSabalenka… truly the biggest challenge in women’s tennis right now.
Yes, because of her desperate sounding scream I will never root for her. Truly obnoxious and gamesmanship.The loudest challenge also
Kvitova was good but i have gone off her for some time now. A very disappointing career wimbledon record when you consider her games potential.Every 2 years, Sabalenka is the Queen of Madrid. Joins Kvitova (2011,2015,2018) as 1 of just 2 players to three-peat at the tournament (2021,2023,2025).
She's always been chaotic results wise a bit like a more stable version of an Ostapenko, but she also benefits more as she's a lefty. I think players with those huge ball striking games just can't be expected to string 7 match wins in a row together and not have huge dips in form.Kvitova was good but i have gone off her for some time now. A very disappointing career wimbledon record when you consider her games potential.
There is more to her than ostapenko for me. More all court game, more agility and better returns. The serve is a huge differerence with a much more difficult 2nd serve even if it were right handed. She had a height advantage over ostapenko. More tenacity when down in a big match too.She's always been chaotic results wise a bit like a more stable version of an Ostapenko, but she also benefits more as she's a lefty. I think players with those huge ball striking games just can't be expected to string 7 match wins in a row together and not have huge dips in form.
Yes, very rare that both pairings like these make it to the final. Both pairs are also unseeded.Kalinskaya/Cirstea vs. Mertens/Kudermetova has to be one of the most level pairings that have ever existed in terms of singles accomplishments.
It's like they're all more or less the same player.
Curva!Did anyone notice she got obscenity warning today? The ump must have understood Polish or knew a set of swear words in different languages.
That was pretty funny... and I actually agree with that guy! Why did they rebrand from the French Open to Roland Garros? RG is such a mouthful, and doesn't sound prestigious or important.Max/TNT awaits ...
Luckily these two are not the ones doing the actual coverage. Looks like it'll be Agassi for studio analyst and possibly commentary by Brian Anderson and JMac.
People keep waiting for Gauff to turn a corner, but this is her. And honestly, I only expect it to get worse.I thought it would be close but Sabalenka played very consistently. All the worst traits of Gauff came out to play. She played nowhere near as well as the semi.
At one point Sabalenka won 17 straight points in the first set, and I would say that was the best stretch. Some of her points were seriously impressive.Very good win for Sabalenka. The best tennis of the day was probably played between 1-1 and 5-3 Coco in the 2nd set. RG should be interesting
Uhm, just to clarify, anywhere other than the English-speaking world (and I think it might be just the US?) this major has always been known as Roland-Garros. People wouldn't even understand what you're talking about if you said "Open de France", "Open de Francia" or "Französische Open". Just to make it clear that you're the minority in thinking the "French Open" nomenclature is prestigious or important.That was pretty funny... and I actually agree with that guy! Why did they rebrand from the French Open to Roland Garros? RG is such a mouthful, and doesn't sound prestigious or important.
Do they think that because Wimbledon isn't the English Open (or the British Open), that they can follow suit? Dumb.
I don't think the "French Open" is particularly prestigious or important, or at least not any more than the US Open. But here in the US, a big tennis playing and watching country, I believe it has always been referred to as the French Open (to go with the US Open, Australian Open and Wimbledon).Uhm, just to clarify, anywhere other than the English-speaking world (and I think it might be just the US?) this major has always been known as Roland-Garros. People wouldn't even understand what you're talking about if you said "Open de France", "Open de Francia" or "Französische Open". Just to make it clear that you're the minority in thinking the "French Open" nomenclature is prestigious or important.![]()
Not a bad final, despite the scoreline. Enjoyed watching Sabalenka's offense overcome Gauff's defense. The tennis gods will be happy.
Curva!
That was pretty funny... and I actually agree with that guy! Why did they rebrand from the French Open to Roland Garros? RG is such a mouthful, and doesn't sound prestigious or important.
Do they think that because Wimbledon isn't the English Open (or the British Open), that they can follow suit? Dumb.
People keep waiting for Gauff to turn a corner, but this is her. And honestly, I only expect it to get worse.
Physically, I don't think Gauff will get any better or fitter, and mentally I think her demons will only get more and more prevalent.
Gauff's mentality is a strange one. She is known for fighting and never giving up, and it's certainly true. She will run and scrap on every point. That said, during the actual points, you can often see her getting tight when it comes to actual technical execution. So it's like she always wants to fight and play hard, but her brain just overthinks it sometimes and gets in the way.
At one point Sabalenka won 17 straight points in the first set, and I would say that was the best stretch. Some of her points were seriously impressive.
Osaka wins the 125K in Saint-Malo - as should be expected!
Sabalenka has a real chance in Paris.