TennisGrandpA
Legend
@tennis_pro here I said this@Hitman @Djokovic_is_the_best#1 i told you already Novak will be the favourite, he has aura at AO
@tennis_pro here I said this@Hitman @Djokovic_is_the_best#1 i told you already Novak will be the favourite, he has aura at AO
Exactly, this reminds me of Wimbledon 2019 as well.Yup, Sinner tossed away those break points like he was Federer.
No one cares. Just go away. No one believes anything you say.@tennis_pro here I said this
EwwwPlease Novak win the title!
Nadal's records are safe now too...
Not today
2/17 on break points Sinner. WORST Conversion EVER.
I remember Hewitt vs. Schalken at 2002 Wimbledon. In the third set and early in the fourth set, Hewitt had over 20 break points and didn't convert any of them. Hewitt eventually won 6-2, 6-2, 6-7, 1-6, 7-5 (after being down a break in the fifth set, twice).Almost - the worst I've seen was 1/17 lol
Did this really happen? LolGot to love the chants of "Imhotep, Imhotep..."
Good interview from Gramps. I wouldn't bet against that dude just now.
Hear, hear!Some of the clutch serving from SamprasVic was out of this world!
Agree that, man. Enjoyed your comment.The GOAT put on a display tonight. Woowwwww!!! I'm actually shocked. What a performance on those big points. Good fight from Sinner but the AO king wasn't going to be denied. Hats off to all 4 Semifinalists for emptying the tank today and giving us a show. This is what tennis is all about.
Listening this morning and heard the crowd cheering it. Seriously.Did this really happen? Lol
Listening this morning and heard the crowd cheering it. Seriously.
After the 1st set and how Jannik routined him there, I thought we were headed to another Sinner in 3 or no more than 4 sets. Djokovic had other ideas. He really dug deep and beat the guy who's his toughest opponent right now and who's been dominating on hardcourt the last 2 years. Well dominating everyone except Alcaraz at least. Pretty impressive indeed.Yah man, Novak. Top drawer stuff to deliver a superb win after such a hard-fought match. Many (including me) anticipated a straightforward loss to Jannik, and there was much talk of a Carlitos / Jannik final. This win is a remarkable achievement at several levels - to beat Jannik who is considered the best current hard court player and defending AO champion; to do so over 5 well contested sets lasting over 4 hours at his age; to play strategically to his strengths, remaining focused. Dude relishes the challenge, and perhaps this, above all, burnishes his longevity at the top of the game.
As for Jannik, this experience is part of the learning curve that he, as a great player, will no doubt use to his future advantage, Dude is astute, hungry to improve and to excel, and I anticipate he will continue in similar vein.
Agree that, man. Enjoyed your comment.
Which
Looking at the match stats, I believe that the guy with Sinner’s numbers wins the match in 99.9% of the cases,
Thanks. I do my analysis so they can be easily comprehended.Thanks for the comprehensive analysis.
Are you the same gentleman (?) who claimed Djok had "no chance" against Sinner in their semi?Thanks for the comprehensive analysis.
Are you the same gentleman (?) who claimed Djok had "no chance" against Sinner in their semi?
just checking
Obviously you caused this cataclysm. Shame on you.Guilty. Very guilty.![]()
Egg thanked me (around 20 seconds in).Obviously you caused this cataclysm. Shame on you.
well said!All right folks. We now have the true heavyweight fight between 2 all-time clutch players. Djoker will probably need to beat Alcaraz in 4 in order to win. Unlike Sinner, who is now 6-11 in 5-set matches, Alcaraz dials up his game in the 5th set.
I hope that the final goes 5 sets. Now obviously, I will be cheering on Alcaraz. He’s my favorite player. But if Djoker wins, then I will give 100% credit to him. What he’s doing is absolutely insane.
Will Djoker beat 2 generations of my favorite players in slam finals? First Fed, and now maybe Alcaraz? If he beats Alcaraz on Sunday, then he might as well grab a flux capacitor, then go back to 1984 and beat McEnroe in the Wimbledon final to complete the trifecta.
This is why it’s best to stick to predicting time travel tennis. The second you predict an actual match it becomes clear you simply don’t have a clue
That’s exactly my point. What seems an “obvious” result is many times wrong. And that’s for an outcome where we can observe the result. Imagine for time travel tennis! Complete waste of timeOh yeah it was definitely unusual to predict Sinner would win the SF lol, I went out on a real limb
Captain hindsight over here![]()
Idk if these guys take those BP for granted. Alcaraz similiar aswell. Sinner too passive sometimes he definitely should have gone bigger at times. Novak's shots were more penetrating and damaging Sinner couldn't create many angles in this slow low bouncing court don't think he likes it..How the heck did Sinner lose? I mean 8 break points in the final set? One 0-40 and two 15-40's and you can't convert?
2/18 breakpoint conversion overall.
Sinner was TOO AFRAID to go to Novak's forehand. Kept on hitting to Novak's backhand and didn't move Djokovic or even put him under much stress. He didn't use angles to drag Novak off the court, nor did he go bigger on his groundies to attack Novak's forehand, try break it down and keep him guessing.
I've gotta say I'm very disappointed by Sinner. As much as Novak's incredible effort, to me Sinner lost the match, rather than Novak won it.
That’s exactly my point. What seems an “obvious” result is many times wrong. And that’s for an outcome where we can observe the result. Imagine for time travel tennis! Complete waste of time
WTF are you talking about?AGI won't be limited by the constraints of humanity, kid.