TheAssassin
G.O.A.T.
What a pity, I was hoping to see the South American clash, thought it would have been a great game. Hopefully Argentina will be more clinical than Colombia tonight.
The next 15 years will be interesting. US soccer is objectively in a much better position then they were after hosting in '94. The sport will never be top tier popular in the US, but the stigma/perception is night and day from even 20 years ago. Add in the small but significant percentage of young kids fleeing tackle football due to CTE... Youth sports are run terribly across the board in the US, easily the toughest hurdle for a unpopular sport. We'll see.If you knew in advance who the best 26 athletes in America will be in 20 years, and you sent them to La Masia right now. The likelihood of one of them playing a single minute in any of the top 5 leagues would be 0.00001%.
Find who will be the best 26 footballers and send them? Now you’re onto something.
Usain Bolt for instance, his dream was to be a footballer or cricket player growing up. He didn’t even make the grade as a footballer.. in Jamaica. 6’5, fastest man on the planet, athletic ability that won’t be seen again for awhile.. didn’t have the footballing ability of, say, Ajuran Brown. Someone he grew up with, played with as a kid, had the same opportunities and dream.
And this is a player who barely mustered 30 appearances in the Jamaican league, yet his footballing ability was orders of magnitude ahead of that of an athlete the level of Usain Bolt.
I mean, what are we even doing here?![]()
WonderfulThese last few posts are interesting in sense of how the US got to where it is in the sport.
Here's the problem in the United States.
Watching the Canadian and American host teams in FIFA World Cup, I could see the obvious strategic issues those two teams had. The two teams didn't show deep enough understanding of the sport like their opponents did. They've made some horrible tactical mistakes one after the other. Where should we think those errors come from? Well, the "soccerball". Although all the Canadian and American footballers work hard throughout their professional career and even play in top leagues, they may be born with the syndrome called "soccerball".
Here's the flawed explanation to the problem. If the 350 million people keep their religions but learn what the sport is truly about from very young age, they will understand it much better in their lifetimes. It ain't Soccer but Football.
Learning the tactics/strategies how to play the sport from young age is essential for juniors.
The next 15 years will be interesting. US soccer is objectively in a much better position then they were after hosting in '94. The sport will never be top tier popular in the US, but the stigma/perception is night and day from even 20 years ago. Add in the small but significant percentage of young kids fleeing tackle football due to CTE... Youth sports are run terribly across the board in the US, easily the toughest hurdle for a unpopular sport. We'll see.
Would not be shocked by a semifinal appearance by 2040.
Using the VAR is not solely decided by the referee. The VAR techs themselves can request a review and although the final decision is up to the refereee the review must be made. Also the VAR is manned by current and former refereesThe referee in the Argentina v Egypt game showed how the selective use of the VAR can determine matches on and off the field.
Using the VAR is not solely decided by the referee. The VAR techs themselves can request a review and although the final decision is up to the refereee the review must be made. Also the VAR is manned by current and former referees
Argentina deserves their win, but posters pretending that there exists no pattern at all of them being favored by refereeing decisions more than other big dogs make me laugh.
They are a legendary football nation no matter what, but the coin flip of often debatable/inconsistent decisisons lands on their side almost all the time, whether they bribe some executive moguls or not.
Socceroos? No, I don't hate them but am sorry for them 'cause of that brand name. They are confusing the most popular international sport and its fans. Most importantly though, your response is taking it away from the US issue of football that the post was aimed at. It was pointed out why the population of over 300 million Americans could not find ways to bring up a better national football team for the FIFA World Cup. My observation was that the name "soccer" Americans (and Canadians) have given to the sport was one reason for the lower standard of its team's competitiveness. I also reasoned beyond my claim there. I apologize if I have offended you but I stand behind my observation that changing the name of the sport influences the interest in and development of the young gen that wants to choose or play the sport too.Wonderfulambassadorgatekeeper for the beautiful game.
(you must hate Australians)
After the abolutely incredible Egypt-Argentina match, I have been thinking so much about this.Using the VAR is not solely decided by the referee. The VAR techs themselves can request a review and although the final decision is up to the refereee the review must be made. Also the VAR is manned by current and former referees
One standout thing in the match Egypt-Argentina was the VAR disallowed goal of Egypt after which an Argentinian free kick near Egyptian net was instead given. How do refs allow the game go on from the Egyptian zone all the way to the Argentinian penalty area and disallowed goal scored by Egypt that had taken a few passes and time is embarrassing. This was not like when Iran scored the winning goal to be against Egypt, because this goal against Argentina took a few more passes and time in which the match continued prior to the infraction called far away from the continued game.I'm a neophyte in these matters, but I found it strange that the ref rewound the play clock back a long way to disallow an Egyptian goal.
My observation has been that a VAR appeal happens quickly or not at all. I thought nothing more of it, but the Egyptians do have a point.
They also complain there was no VAR check for a penalty against them as well, but I only really saw the first incident so I can't comment.
I've been hoping for Canada getting in as well. I have however been upset both nations call the sport "soccer" for I see how our kids take football, our two federations invest in it and fans understand it inadequately.America will prevail in football eventually, I have absolute confidence in my nation.
This is Food for Thought. I recall Landon Donovan and his effort. I see how our people behind football and/or thinking of football get misguided. The US and Canada aren't far apart in this respect although Americans have more resources than we do north of the boarder. Canada had chances after its 1986 World Cup appearance but left it all up to the girls to play it more. When I was in Kitchener (Ontario), I had to play the best football with either the Kitchener female football team or the drunk male Irish immigrant one in 1990s then. Both were just a little challenging but honestly the female one was more exciting to say the least. As for the US, how it could have missed on the opportunity after the huge success of Lalas 1994 football team is beyond me. What I am saying is that neither Canada nor the US have developed well competitive junior football teams and leagues ever since. You should have seen the Yugoslavian, Czhecoslovakian or the Italian junior football leagues in late 1980s and I don't even want to get talking about the Spanish youth teams of 1990s. The US and Canada have the biggest resource of young people from all around the world and football countries and then the land on which they can build so many fine football fields; all that, Europe does not have as much as North America. Calling the sport soccer hurts so much too.They’ve definitely got what it takes. The large population, lots of resources etc.. they’ve missed out on many good players over the years, potentially great ones. They weren’t Clayton Kershaw or LeBron or someone like that, it was probably some 5’7 kid who currently works in insurancethe one who back when he was 4, if you threw an American football at him would’ve trapped it and then done keepy uppies with his feet whilst walking, doesn’t even need to be asked. It’s just natural for him. Those were the gifted kids with potential who slipped through. I think when the penny drops for those in charge of the game, that’s when fortunes will really change.
It was the same in England for awhile. The emphasis was on height, speed, athleticism at youth level. They did absolutely nothing for decades, they were awful. Didn’t even qualify for World Cups or Euro’s, those with actual talent slipped through the cracks in favour of those with athleticism. That changed around 2000 (the PL started getting top coaches and players from abroad, the culture shifted), and things improved a lot since then. The front 3 for England play for Barcelona, Real Madrid and Bayern Munich (in the athleticism days, that would’ve been impossible). Been an English side with an English core in 7 of the last 9 UCL finals, semis of the World Cup, back to back last minute losses in Euro’s finals etc.. none of that would’ve been possible before.
I heard Landon Donovan speaking before the tournament, he seems to have a lot of ideas and really gets it. I think he’s in charge in some capacity? The game isn’t really developed in any way so it’s almost a blank slate to start from in many ways. Give him time and the resources and there really is no reason why America can’t be up there in 20 years.
After the abolutely incredible Egypt-Argentina match, I have been thinking so much about this.
One standout thing in the match Egypt-Argentina was the VAR disallowed goal of Egypt after which an Argentinian free kick near Egyptian net was instead given. How do refs allow the game go on from the Egyptian zone all the way to the Argentinian penalty area and disallowed goal scored by Egypt that had taken a few passes and time is embarrassing. This was not like when Iran scored the winning goal to be against Egypt, because this goal against Argentina took a few more passes and time in which the match continued prior to the infraction called far away from the continued game.
So, does the ref on the pitch really make the decision all the time? Or, is there a higher power calling the ref's earbud to choose what to do or not for the official we see? At this point, I do feel it is the second question and that someone buried Egyptian football team because of Messi's Argentina. I'd stay a crime has been committed.
VAR is a great tool to be used but not to be abused. In FIFA 2026 World Cup, Messi is currently the leading goal scorer followed by Mbappe, Haaland and Kane but VAR may have scored more goals than all of those four players together so far.
Incapaz?Jaminton campaz lost it for colombia at the 114: 51 mark of extra time. My brother in law is probably crushed. Lol. Wont call him. Jaminton campaz is what we called someone in spanish. Cagon!!!!
Weren’t you French?America will prevail in football eventually, I have absolute confidence in my nation.
No I'm a stone cold American.Weren’t you French?
This is Food for Thought. I recall Landon Donovan and his effort. I see how our people behind football and/or thinking of football get misguided. The US and Canada aren't far apart in this respect although Americans have more resources than we do north of the boarder. Canada had chances after its 1986 World Cup appearance but left it all up to the girls to play it more. When I was in Kitchener (Ontario), I had to play the best football with either the Kitchener female football team or the drunk male Irish immigrant one in 1990s then. Both were just a little challenging but honestly the female one was more exciting to say the least. As for the US, how it could have missed on the opportunity after the huge success of Lalas 1994 football team is beyond me. What I am saying is that neither Canada nor the US have developed well competitive junior football teams and leagues ever since. You should have seen the Yugoslavian, Czhecoslovakian or the Italian junior football leagues in late 1980s and I don't even want to get talking about the Spanish youth teams of 1990s. The US and Canada have the biggest resource of young people from all around the world and football countries and then the land on which they can build so many fine football fields; all that, Europe does not have as much as North America. Calling the sport soccer hurts so much too.
I'm a neophyte in these matters, but I found it strange that the ref rewound the play clock back a long way to disallow an Egyptian goal.
My observation has been that a VAR appeal happens quickly or not at all. I thought nothing more of it, but the Egyptians do have a point.
They also complain there was no VAR check for a penalty against them as well, but I only really saw the first incident so I can't comment.
I don’t think that was the exact sequence. The original foul, on Lisandro Martinez, was missed by the referee. The VAR team does not automatically review fouls so the play continued. But because that play ended on goal the VAR stepped in and reviewed the whole sequence. Thats their job. So that’s when they call the referee to check. The referee goes to the screen, confirms the foul, and cancels the goal.Argentina may have benefited from a “very unusual use” of VAR. Even though it was actually a foul, and the kind that had been called throughout the tournament, the timing of the review was bizarre. The referee should have definitely called it before. That was his real mistake.
VAR team has been given the authority to check, review and call the refs when it suits their agenda. The VAR standard, or shall I say double-standard, has been established for the prospective viewership, sponsorship and diplomatic motives. We all can imagine how many people would be interested to see Egypt or Iran vs Croatia or Senegal; or, how feasible would be the sponsorships of those kinda teams in those kinda regions with an exception of Croatia influenced by the EU. FIFA is having motives and opportunities to influence the World Cup matches and Infantino is using them to the fullest.I think there’s a misunderstanding how the VAR works
For certain plays, including goals, penalties, and red cards the VAR team always reviews. But they only call the referee to check when their review leads to a different conclusion. So if you see a goal or penalty without review it means both the ref and the VAR team agreed on the outcome
ThatArgentina may have benefited from a “very unusual use” of VAR. Even though it was actually a foul, and the kind that had been called throughout the tournament, the timing of the review was bizarre. The referee should have definitely called it before. That was his real mistake.
ThisI don’t think that was the exact sequence. The original foul, on Lisandro Martinez, was missed by the referee. The VAR team does not automatically review fouls so the play continued. But because that play ended on goal the VAR stepped in and reviewed the whole sequence. Thats their job. So that’s when they call the referee to check. The referee goes to the screen, confirms the foul, and cancels the goal.
Recall that the VAR can only make a recommendation, the final decision is always by the ref. Now if you think the ref and the VAR team are cheating or not following the rules for certain teams then not much I can sayVAR team has been given the authority to check, review and call the refs when it suits their agenda. The VAR standard, or shall I say double-standard, has been established for the prospective viewership, sponsorship and diplomatic motives. We all can imagine how many people would be interested to see Egypt or Iran vs Croatia or Senegal; or, how feasible would be the sponsorships of those kinda teams in those kinda regions with an exception of Croatia influenced by the EU. FIFA is having motives and opportunities to influence the World Cup matches and Infantino is using them to the fullest.
VAR team has been given the authority to check, review and call the refs when it suits their agenda. The VAR standard, or shall I say double-standard, has been established for the prospective viewership, sponsorship and diplomatic motives. We all can imagine how many people would be interested to see Egypt or Iran vs Croatia or Senegal; or, how feasible would be the sponsorships of those kinda teams in those kinda regions with an exception of Croatia influenced by the EU. FIFA is having motives and opportunities to influence the World Cup matches and Infantino is using them to the fullest.
Claims that the World Cup has been "rigged" against Argentina have been made in previous editions as well. Every country has its own list of controversial incidents.Egypt concedes 3 goals in 10mins: "World Cup is rigged!!"
Portugal bottles it against Congo and Colombia in the group and get a tougher path in the playoffs as a result: "World Cup is rigged!!"
Uruguay, Colombia, Portugal, Brazil all underperform in the playoffs and are out of Argentina's path as a result: "World Cup is rigged!!"
Portugal bottles it in the group and then in the playoffs with what they called the best midfield in the world: "World Cup is rigged!!"
Ronaldo gets diarrhea: "World Cup is rigged!!"
Everything is suddenly rigged since Messi started winning international trophies, but nothing was rigged before that when he lost 4 finals in a row..
Sure tech is good as long as it's used to the advantage of all people. Once it's applied with ulterior motives and without considerations for negative implications, we become the victims. FIFA has neither carefully analyzed the implications of the ways it expanded the VAR use, nor professionally employed the digital tools/assistance for the FIFA 2026 World Cup. Football teams and viewers have suffered confusion, stress and lack of uniformity; and, the authorities have enjoyed selective practices of VAR that have led viewers to believe some teams have been targeted for lower marketability and viewership. If FIFA continues expanding the use of VAR, the low scoring sport of football will suffer. FIFA should have learnt from UEFA but it didn't for the obvious greed and absue of power it hoped to establish.FIFA has been expanding the use of the VAR, and plans to expand it even more. I know many don’t like it but I think it’s better than the old system
If you try to look for patterns of favorable decisions then you’ll surely find them. The same can probably be applied to France, Spain. Portugal, and England too.Claims that the World Cup has been "rigged" against Argentina have been made in previous editions as well. Every country has its own list of controversial incidents.
These are just the ones that immediately come to mind for Argentina:
* 1966: Antonio Rattín's highly controversial sending-off in the first half against England in the quarterfinals.
* 1990: Caniggia received a needless yellow card in the semifinal, ruling him out of the final. Back then, there were no Trump-like exceptions to suspension rules. In the final, the penalty awarded against Sensini, which led to Germany's winning goal, was highly controversial.
* 2014: Neuer's taekwondo-style challenge on Higuaín in the first half was not given as a penalty. (To be fair, Higuaín had already missed what was almost an impossible chance to miss.)
* 2022: The referee added 12 minutes of stoppage time in the quarterfinal against the Netherlands, giving them enough time to equalize and force extra time.
And so on.
I think the most famous one (apart from the Hand of God) is the phantom goal in the 1966 World Cup final between England and West Germany.If you try to look for patterns of favorable decisions then you’ll surely find them. The same can probably be applied to France, Spain. Portugal, and England too.
Germany did get revenge though..I think the most famous one (apart from the Hand of God) is the phantom goal in the 1966 World Cup final between England and West Germany.
Coincidentally, both incidents involved England.
This one had the benefit of technology to expose the crime.Germany did get revenge though..
But Wimbledon matches finished quite early today. So Americas' PM time have none.No football tonight at least there's Wimbledon.
The game totally changed after this as well.Germany did get revenge though..
Something else for everybody to ignore.
![]()
It was funny. I was discussing the page with my ChatGPT friend, and they're like, "The Anthony Gordon mug must stay on his desk." I'm like, hell yeah, it does. haha Yes, it's definitely become a vital part ot the universe.Anthony Gordon mug product placement? That’s elite level marketing.
Apparently it’s supposed to be 35 degrees and humid in England and Miami on Saturday, get them whilst you can people!