Also to add, winning grand slam is the ultimate achievement in tennis. Nothing else comes close.Not an excuse but an explanation is that Raducanu, like Vondrousova and Andreescu, faced multiple chronic injury issues after her major win. On top of that, Raducanu winning the U.S. Open in her first year on tour was not prepared for the pressure on her in a huge commercial market famous for awful tabloid journalism that almost certainly affected her mentally for the rest of her career, which none of these other one-off major winners experienced. She played really well those 2 weeks at the USO, but we've only seen flashes of that since like her playing peak Sabalenka close.
At my club, this used to be frowned upon (underarm serve level derision). I personally never felt it was unsportsmanlike or anything... perfectly legal. Well, I do admit going for extra-wide short serves (almost like a drop-serve) to take advantage of the near side fence on some courts.God tier moonball-dropshot combo.
I'e personally always felt that anyone complaining about those shots, including underarm-serving, are simply sour grapes because they couldn't handle it.At my club, this used to be frowned upon (underarm serve level derision). I personally never felt it was unsportsmanlike or anything... perfectly legal. Well, I do admit going for extra-wide short serves (almost like a drop-serve) to take advantage of the near side fence on some courts.
Iga is now the 2nd best Pole on clay. What a pass on match point from Maja, such an impressive win
If someone told you a Pole and an Italian would be in the women's and men's final, you probably wouldn't think much about it. Then someone tells you it won't be Iga and Sinner.Iga is now the 2nd best Pole on clay. What a pass on match point from Maja, such an impressive win
Chwalinska mania is running wild.Okay, who's ready for Chwalinskamania?
Seriously, and Qinwen who was one of the best players in the world just a couple of years ago.@tennis_pro
Even without beating Saba, I think Chwalinska's route through is tougher than Raducanu's was:
Chwalinska has already beaten three seeds, and would have to beat four to win the title. Raducanu beat two.
The highest seed Raducanu beat was #11 (Bencic). Chwalinska would have to beat the #8 (Andreeva), and a #8 who is very young and could be under-ranked as a result.
Of course, if Andreeva were injured and Chwalinska won with a walkover or withdrawal, we'd have to think further. But assuming Chwalinska won a completed match, I think her draw is tougher than Raducanu's.
I know she's imploded before but this was way worse than any previous imho, I mean the bagel at least was shocking to me.This is not shocking at all haha. This is Sabalenka at her finest and why she has so many slam QF, SF and Final losses. She’s not headstrong.