NaomiKonjuhPotapova
G.O.A.T.
She's serving pretty much 60% or above except Sierra match.Every first serve is either out or hits the net with the odd ace thrown in. Is that not serving bad?
She's serving pretty much 60% or above except Sierra match.Every first serve is either out or hits the net with the odd ace thrown in. Is that not serving bad?
Not meant to happen. Meek surrender.Just checked that if Pegula wins Wimbledon, she will achieve her best ever #2 ranking.
So this match is important for her as part of the path.
She was not. Rybakina is no 2 no? I think she would be couple hundreds below Rybakina.Just checked that if Pegula wins Wimbledon, she will achieve her best ever #2 ranking.
So this match is important for her as part of the path.
Conclusion...Just an interesting random thing to throw in there,
Serena's first slam was USO, Coco's first slam was USO
Serena's second slam was RG, Coco's second slam was RG
Serena's third slam was W, Coco is now in the semis of W
In my case, there's no point in tuning in for her matches at all. I had switched to Sinner when it looked like Jess had declined so much, but then ESPN switched to show the last point. I know better than to watch her matches live - pretty much the opposite of you!She has literally done the same thing two matches in a row. Unwatchable first set to really pretty good third set. Literally no point tuning in for her matches at the beginning unless you hate yourself.
Kudos Gauff. She played pretty well in the end. It's never really Beautiful Tennis with her. But the serve and forehand held up for the most part in the last two sets, she had some timely and effective net play and drop shots, and she, as always, defended and competed well. I only watched from mid second set onward, and at least from that point, she looked pretty good.
It reflects weaknesses - whether the forehand going off or the serve not clicking - but also reflects strengths - the ability to get the forehand and serve working better at times during the match, defense, grinding. You never know with Coco. Some points she'll play a straight up, good-looking tennis point, but those often don't come in consecutive bunches. She is, often if not always, an "ugly" player. But I respect that she keeps plugging and finds ways to win. I would like the overall package to look more cohesive and prettier, but I'm not sure that will ever happen.Gauff sure has a tendency to play long messy matches
I mean it's working, but it's hard to watch
This was probably Jpeg's last shot and she blew it big time.Gotta feel for Jpeg. Can she back playing doubles with good partner so we can give her a slam double at least?
Sorry, I misread, she would have been #3, good catch.She was not. Rybakina is no 2 no? I think she would be couple hundreds below Rybakina.
That's a great way to sum up her game and career.It reflects weaknesses - whether the forehand going off or the serve not clicking - but also reflects strengths - the ability to get the forehand and serve working better at times during the match, defense, grinding. You never know with Coco. Some points she'll play a straight up, good-looking tennis point, but those often don't come in consecutive bunches. She is, often if not always, an "ugly" player. But I respect that she keeps plugging and finds ways to win. I would like the overall package to look more cohesive and prettier, but I'm not sure that will ever happen.
I wish Wozniacki would stop talking throughout the points.
Technical is goodI have Navratilova commentating in mine. She’s very technical
Winning ugly, coach Gilbert is long gone, but his legacy remains!Gauff sure has a tendency to play long messy matches
I mean it's working, but it's hard to watch
As much as I hate to admit it, this is not the Osaka of old. We now have a more tentative version.