ByeByePoly
G.O.A.T.
Coming from tennis … lately I find myself seldom wishing I had more power than the current paddle choices. In fact, recently playing better (having better results) switching to less powerful paddle than the thermoformed paddles. I can still hit hard enough drive, and enough pace for forehand pass down the line when it’s open. At the end of the day … unforced errors often decide wins and losses, and levels.
I feel differently about spin … I would buy 25% more spin immediately. For the last 6+ months I have played with carbon faced high tier spin paddles (Vatic Pros). In the last couple of months I have come close to a reliable topspin lob from the baseline. I would say it’s at the point of being just short of a reliable low user error shot. Some days yes, other days too many near misses. But on the days it’s on, I would call it a doubles kitchen skill centric disrupter. It changes the nature of doubles by giving some weight to baseline skills which are mostly neutered by the time you reach higher intermediate rec play.
There is a reason you don’t see topspin lobs in pro pickleball doubles. The small court dimensions and high level player skills makes it a shot that doesn’t work at that level. Give the pros 25% more spin … my guess is it totally changes that risk/reward ratio. The commentators are already predicting more successful lobbing as the trend.
Give a 3.5 doubles player a 7 out of 10 topspin baseline lob that clears opponents overhead and lands in jumping away from opponent, and they just became a 4.0.
I feel differently about spin … I would buy 25% more spin immediately. For the last 6+ months I have played with carbon faced high tier spin paddles (Vatic Pros). In the last couple of months I have come close to a reliable topspin lob from the baseline. I would say it’s at the point of being just short of a reliable low user error shot. Some days yes, other days too many near misses. But on the days it’s on, I would call it a doubles kitchen skill centric disrupter. It changes the nature of doubles by giving some weight to baseline skills which are mostly neutered by the time you reach higher intermediate rec play.
There is a reason you don’t see topspin lobs in pro pickleball doubles. The small court dimensions and high level player skills makes it a shot that doesn’t work at that level. Give the pros 25% more spin … my guess is it totally changes that risk/reward ratio. The commentators are already predicting more successful lobbing as the trend.
Give a 3.5 doubles player a 7 out of 10 topspin baseline lob that clears opponents overhead and lands in jumping away from opponent, and they just became a 4.0.
