3 Years Ago Today.....

Entername

Professional
....40-15 happened on July 14, 2019. I remember coming home when this match was 5-2 Fed in the fourth set and I kept thinking to myself, there's no way Fed's actually gonna win this is he? I posted this elsewhere but I still can't fathom that Fed lost this.

"40-15, two championship points, he's on serve (he's hit over 10,000 aces in his lifetime and even more unreturned serves), his favourite surface, his favourite court, whole stadium on his side rooting for him, history on the line to solidify GOAThood, fairly subpar Djokovic given their standards (he was the better player most of the match), yet somehow he lost it."

Credit to Djokovic obviously, this dude has no quit in his brain even if all odds were stacked against him when it was 8-7, 40-15, he still believed he could comeback to win and he did. I disagree with many of Novak's views but his belief and resistance is something all of us can learn from.

 
Last edited:

DSH

Talk Tennis Guru
It would have been interesting if instead of playing the tie-break in the 12 all they would have done it in the more traditional 6 all but to the best of 10 points, different from the definition of the past.
Would something have changed?
:unsure:
 

pj80

Legend
....40-15 happened on July 14, 2019. I remember coming home when this match was 5-2 Fed in the fourth set and I kept thinking to myself, there's no way Fed's actually gonna win this is he? I posted this elsewhere but I still can't fathom that Fed lost this.

"40-15, two championship points, he's on serve (he's hit over 10,000 aces in his lifetime and even more unreturned serves), his favourite surface, his favourite court, whole stadium on his side rooting for him, history on the line to solidify GOAThood, fairly subpar Djokovic given their standards (he was the better player most of the match), yet somehow he lost it."

Credit to Djokovic obviously, this dude has no quit in his brain even if all odds were stacked against him when it was 8-7, 40-15, he still believed he could comeback to win and he did.

Classic
 

Entername

Professional
It would have been interesting if instead of playing the tie-break in the 12 all they would have done it in the more traditional 6 all but to the best of 10 points, different from the definition of the past.
Would something have changed?
:unsure:
I wonder what would've happened if they had the old-school version of let them keep playing (like in 2008 WI where Rafa won 9-7 and 2009 WI where Fed won 16-14 or something crazy like that)
 

BGod

G.O.A.T.
I have at least my close friend confirming we were standing at the bar watching and at 40-15 I kept saying "It's Novak, he's trolling".

The 40-15 Trilogy is one of the greatest in sport. Right up there with Ali-Frazier, Boys vs. 49ers, etc. But I love it for how truly progressive it was. A recap:

2010 USO: It's 15-40 on Novak's serve in the 5th, Fed has beaten him three consecutive years prior but they were close sets if only one went to 4. Everyone expects Fed to break but Novak holds serve and breaks Fed shortly after. It's shocking as Fed's Slam SF streak was broken that year by Soderling and 7 consecutive Finals at Wimbledon by Berdych.

2011 USO: After having a resurgence at the French largely choking at least first 2 sets to Nadal then blowing 2-0 lead to Tsonga at Wimbledon, Fed blows a 2-0 lead to Novak having an ATG season. But in the 5th set Fed appears again in control up 40-15 on serve to end it, then Novak smirks and nods. Denied. Novak goes on to beat Rafa in 4 for his first USO crown. He finishes the YE at 3rd.

2019 WMB: After a late career resurgence he is seemingly in form at near 38 now no longer faced with prime Djokovic on grass like 14-15. And the match has seen him play better with Novak only winning sets in tiebreaks. And on serve he holds not just 2 MPs but CP. Only once in 70 years has a men's final seen CPs squandered. Not Federer? Yes.

It would have been interesting if instead of playing the tie-break in the 12 all they would have done it in the more traditional 6 all but to the best of 10 points, different from the definition of the past.
Would something have changed?
:unsure:

Novak almost certainly wins.
 

Lauren_Girl'

Hall of Fame
I wonder what would've happened if they had the old-school version of let them keep playing (like in 2008 WI where Rafa won 9-7 and 2009 WI where Fed won 16-14 or something crazy like that)

If the 2008 final had the tie-break at 6-6 in the 5th, Federer might've won this. He won the 2 previous tie-break in this match. We'll never know unfortunately.
 

Ombelibable

Professional
2jdikwtrnca31.png
 

Thriller

Hall of Fame
It is the greatest choke since Jana Novotna. 2 aces to get to championship point then tamely loses the next 7 points in a row. With that serve. Hilarious.

You can't be a GOAT without guts. And so it came to be.

22 > 21 > 20. No happy ending. :)
 

Entername

Professional
The way he just stands there soaking all the salt in. Beautiful.
You can even see it in the background how there are more people in the crowd looking shocked/dejected rather than people genuinely clapping for Novak's win. If Roger had won, the scenes would've been full of euphoria similar to what is was for Rafa in Melbourne this year but it just wasn't meant to be for Fed
 
Top