4 straight winners in a return game

Discussion in 'Former Pro Player Talk' started by krosero, Nov 5, 2015.

  1. pc1

    pc1 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2008
    Messages:
    16,076
    Location:
    Space/Time continuum alternative reality
    Always assumed it was four straight return winners. So I guess for example a drop shot off a serve and volleying the return of the drop shop for a winner counts.
     
    #51
  2. BTURNER

    BTURNER Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2007
    Messages:
    4,383
    Location:
    OREGON
    This does one does NOT meet the definition, but it was a very impressive service game so I am shoving it in. At 5-5 in the first set Evert v Bonder of the 1985 French. , Evert hits two clean winners in which Bonder does not touch the ball with a swing volley and forehand crosscourt, and two that might as well be, because Bonder so barely got her racket on it that the result came nowhere near the court for a break of serve at love.
     
    #52
  3. NonP

    NonP Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2009
    Messages:
    1,855
    As you can see the thread title has been modified accordingly. Wonder who urged the mods? :cool::oops: (Hope krosero won't mind.)

    Also here's more reason why we all should heed Moose's exhortation to rely on visual evidence only. This SI article about the 2012 AO SF between Djoko and Murray says Novak hit "[f]our straight return winners" to break Andy and take the 4th set 6-1:

    https://www.si.com/tennis/beyond-ba...vic-andy-murray-australian-open-live-analysis

    But that's not quite accurate, as you can see here starting at 3:31:05:



    So more like one forced error by Andy off Novak's deep return followed by the latter's 3 straight return winners. Close but no cigar.

    Aside #1: Y'all might recall both guys held serve surprisingly well in this match (well, at the beginning of it anyway), so this return game by Novak was most likely the highlight of the evening. (Despite my Djoko fandom I'll admit this was probably the most boring 5-setter I can recall watching.)

    Aside #2: Surprised neither of these guys nor Agassi is on Moose's list yet. I'm sure we'll find some examples eventually.
     
    Moose Malloy likes this.
    #53
  4. abmk

    abmk Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2008
    Messages:
    31,103
    Location:
    U.S
    good catch regarding that Djoko return game, but


    Djoko broke Murray 2 times in the first set and Murray broke him 1 time in the first set.
    Djoko broke Murray 2 times in the second set and Murray broke hum 3 times in the second set

    Overall, Djoko broke Murray 11 times and Murray broke him 7 times.

    http://web.archive.org/web/20120719...n.com:80/en_AU/scores/stats/day17/1601ms.html

    Hardly a case of both of holding serve well (at any stage of the match)
    You've confused it with their 2013 final where neither guy broke in the 1st 2 sets.
     
    #54
  5. NonP

    NonP Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2009
    Messages:
    1,855
    Yeah I was trying to watch the Olympic coverage at the same time so must've had a brain fart. :oops: Could've sworn their '13 final went the distance but maybe I'm combining the two matches in my head (that is, I thought the '12 SF featured both 5 sets and few breaks as opposed to just one of those two).

    I'm pretty sure about the 5-setter being a bit of a slog, though. :p Watched most of it on replay to fulfill my duties as a tennis fanatic and that's exactly what it felt like - work rather than fun. Don't think I've ever felt that way watching such an important match.
     
    #55
  6. abmk

    abmk Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2008
    Messages:
    31,103
    Location:
    U.S
    nah, their AO 2012 semi was good. (one of the few good matches in their rivalry - from PoV of watching as well)

    AO 13 final was boring for the first 2 sets (though even) and then Djokovic ran away with it after Murray's blister issues.
     
    #56

Share This Page