6-0 and 6-1 Sets Won and Loss in Grand Slam Semifinals/Finals - Federer/Nadal/Djokovic Comparison

The way the OP listed the breadsticks and bagels is a bit confusing (at least to me).

The only way I look at Fedal rivalry in slams is shown below and it shows Roger bageled or breadsticked Rafa at three different slams. They never played at the USO, so that's not even in the discussion. Nadal, predictably, bageled or breadsticked Roger solely in one slam: Roland Garros.

Fed's breadsticks in slams against Nadal:

2006 FO
2017 AO

Fed's bagels in slams against Nadal:


2006 Wimbledon

---------------
Rafa's breadsticks in slams against Fed:

2006 FO
2008 FO
2011 FO

Rafa's bagels in slams against Fed:


2008 FO
 
Federer
6-0, 6-1 Sets Won - 21 (7, 3, 4, 7)
0-6, 1-6 Set Loss - 8 (2, 4, 1, 1)

Nadal
6-0, 6-1 Sets Won - 24 (1, 15, 5, 3)
0-6, 1-6 Sets Loss - 5 (1, 1, 2, 1)

Djokovic
6-0, 6-1 Sets Won - 22 (8, 6, 2, 6)
0-6, 1-6 Sets Loss - 8 (1, 2, 4, 1)

This is somewhat interesting.
:unsure:
Possibly meaningful. But we need to have particular dates and opponents.
 
The way the OP listed the breadsticks and bagels is a bit confusing (at least to me).

The only way I look at Fedal rivalry in slams is shown below and it shows Roger bageled or breadsticked Rafa at three different slams. They never played at the USO, so that's not even in the discussion. Nadal, predictably, bageled or breadsticked Roger solely in one slam: Roland Garros.

Fed's breadsticks in slams against Nadal:

2006 FO
2017 AO

Fed's bagels in slams against Nadal:

2006 Wimbledon

---------------
Rafa's breadsticks in slams against Fed:

2006 FO
2008 FO
2011 FO

Rafa's bagels in slams against Fed:

2008 FO
Didn't Nadal beat Federer 6-1 in one of the sets of the 2019 Wimbledon semifinals?
 
Last edited:
Who is weak era dependent and waited till his late 20s to win 75% of his slams?
Tennis Abstract downgraded Federer and Nadal's respective 20 slams.

Give a wild guess on whose first 17 slams they upgraded? I'll give a hint: in his first 17 slams, he beat Federer 8 times, Nadal 6 times, and Murray 5 times.
 
Tennis Abstract downgraded Federer and Nadal's respective 20 slams.

Give a wild guess on whose first 17 slams they upgraded? I'll give a hint: in his first 17 slams, he beat Federer 8 times, Nadal 6 times, and Murray 5 times.
I wonder why Djokovic never beat peak Nadal at Roland Garros/Wimbledon/US Open.
And I wonder why Djokovic never beat peak Federer at Roland Garros/Wimbledon/US Open...
Looks like Djokovic was only ever "great" because he won after Nadal/Federer had declined.
 
nothing, like 99% of other pointless statistics.
Because Federer doesn't win the stat it doesn't tell us nothing, right?

I think it does say a lot. Nadal having the best ratio in this stat is a tedtament to his RG dominance.
 
Tennis Abstract downgraded Federer and Nadal's respective 20 slams.

Give a wild guess on whose first 17 slams they upgraded? I'll give a hint: in his first 17 slams, he beat Federer 8 times, Nadal 6 times, and Murray 5 times.
Nadal has 22 Slams, not 20.
 
I wonder why Djokovic never beat peak Nadal at Roland Garros/Wimbledon/US Open.
And I wonder why Djokovic never beat peak Federer at Roland Garros/Wimbledon/US Open...
Looks like Djokovic was only ever "great" because he won a
Djokovic did beat those two! However you called those, nobody cared!
 
9aeae3ac92c2d1c460f49f2d80be45d4.jpg
 
Back
Top