It's about talking crap out of your ass and presenting lies as facts.1-3..0-3..its still a beatdown however you analyse it.
8-5 in titles is a worse beatdown IMO.
I don't think Federer is the GOAT, but Djokovic is no great player because of beating an old weak era inflater. I mean what's the argument? "Djokovic is amazing for beating a weak era inflater."
Naah, doesn't work like that. His wins against the weak era king are worth nothing, he's down against Murray on grass (0-2 in H2H, 0-5 in sets played), 2-2 against Nadal. Not good.
That's being down 2-4 on grass against guys of his own generation.