A Collection of the Best Posts

illkhiboy

Hall of Fame
You know what I find most annoying about this forum? No it's not the *******s, *******s or the Nalbytarts (me). It's the fact that brilliant posts are often lost in the sea of mediocrity. So I have made this thread to keep a collection of the best posts of the day. I 'll post my favorite one today, and then hopefully everyone else can contribute and we can read up on the most relevant, insightful and fascinating material posted.

Post 1:

By Cyan, a Professional

Last fair win over Nadal on clay was Andreev in 2005 Valencia.

2007 Hamburg and 2009 Madrid he was exhausted.

2008 Rome he had horrble blisters.

http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=261613&page=4
 
You know what I find most annoying about this forum? No it's not the *******s, *******s or the Nalbytarts (me). It's the fact that brilliant posts are often lost in the sea of mediocrity. So I have made this thread to keep a collection of the best posts of the day. I 'll post my favorite one today, and then hopefully everyone else can contribute and we can read up on the most relevant, insightful and fascinating material posted.

Post 1:

By Cyan, a Professional

Last fair win over Nadal on clay was Andreev in 2005 Valencia.

2007 Hamburg and 2009 Madrid he was exhausted.

2008 Rome he had horrble blisters.

http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=261613&page=4

Now, tell us what you liked about this post.
 
Good idea , Bad pick.

If Nadal won the AO while exhausted, he should have won Hamburg and Madrid too.

Nadal didn't "really" win the AO open, only on paper. Fed basically choked and gave it to him. He did not play well at all in the final and still managed to take Nadal (albeit a tired one) to 5 sets. Nadal has been playing phenomenal tennis this past year, that level will not last.
 
Ohhh great thread! There are soo many...Lemme see,

Federer loves putting maximum pressure on his shoulders and bragging about doing things he has no idea if he can do. I am really making superhuman efforts to refrain from calling him a complete idiot.

He's really setting himself up for intense criticism if he doesn't win it now. What is the benefit of saying that kind of stuff? He will have all the time to say it if he qualifies for the final. Instead of that he's placing the bar really high straight away. His goal shoud be to play a good first round.

This is not smart from Federer. He is getting desperate.

So "I have the game to win the tournament" means he thinks he's not gonna win? You're not making sense either.
If he has the game to win Madrid, let him show it on the court. Bragging about it won't make it true.

Federer is currently just paying off his debt to God for all the luck he got to win the USO 2008. With interest. That was the deal.

Hes ready to win it :D, bring out no 15. MS for Fed hes got this :), no one can stop Fed when hes ready :P

Federer is delusional, just like his worshipers here.
He should worry how to get to Nadal and the finals first, since he is not able to do that as well any more.

Now Fed is looking to win a tourney that is actually set up for him to have an early round exit. I think he sounds like a desparate man that is grasping at anything he can to try and build himself up to feel better. He is really damaged goods mentally right now.

Above posts were a reaction to a Fed interview in which he said that he feels he has the game to win and his goal is to win the title in Madrid. Said that since Madrid higher up is, the balls will be faster and bounce higher,so that will help his serve and he can play aggressively.
 
Last edited:
Good idea , Bad pick.

If Nadal won the AO while exhausted, he should have won Hamburg and Madrid too.
In a slam, players play only every other day, players have a chance to recover even after a tough match. In other tournaments when they play every day, they can be affected, less than 24 hours is not enough recovery time.
Anyway there were other factors in Madrid tournament (conditions, amount of playing before arriving at tournament, draw, etc). The bottom line is a win is a win. Good for Federer to have played so well and collected a comprehensive victory at the end. It seems his serve was excellent all week.
 
This post by Drakulie...

No one on this board has "bashed" Nadal more than you or Nadal_Freak. Constantly making him out to be a wuss, and excusing every single error he makes on a court. >>>>

  • The sun was in his eyes,
  • he is tired,
  • exhausted,
  • he has a blister,
  • he had a tough draw,
  • he was forced to play at night,
  • he wasn't scheduled to play on center courts,
  • the clay court schedule isn't fair
  • there aren't enough clay court events
  • the ATP schedule isn't fair
  • he is made to play two days in a row
  • he is being drug tested, etc.

6 excuses from that list were used multiple times yesterday & are being used as we speak... :D
 
Ohhh great thread! There are soo many...Lemme see,











Above posts were a reaction to a Fed interview in which he said that he feels he has the game to win and his goal is to win the title in Madrid. Said that since Madrid higher up is, the balls will be faster and bounce higher,so that will help his serve and he can play aggressively.

lmao. Oh vtmike, you really are enjoying this, aren't you?
 
In a slam, players play only every other day, players have a chance to recover even after a tough match. In other tournaments when they play every day, they can be affected, less than 24 hours is not enough recovery time.
Anyway there were other factors in Madrid tournament (conditions, amount of playing before arriving at tournament, draw, etc). The bottom line is a win is a win. Good for Federer to have played so well and collected a comprehensive victory at the end. It seems his serve was excellent all week.


yeah thank goodness for that! Unfortunately his serve will not be as effective at RG.
 
Ohhh great thread! There are soo many...Lemme see,











Above posts were a reaction to a Fed interview in which he said that he feels he has the game to win and his goal is to win the title in Madrid. Said that since Madrid higher up is, the balls will be faster and bounce higher,so that will help his serve and he can play aggressively.
Yes he did score the win and proved his point. I still dislike advance gloating, I dislike it on principle. The final outcome doesn't make a difference. I dislike gloating as much as I dislike making a scene after a loss. They're both reprehensible attitudes in my book and I'll stick by this opinion.
 
vtmike is desperate for attention. Just shows a sad state of his shallow mind.

Anyway both of my quoted posts are still true and accurate. It is just hard for someone like vtmike to realize that.

If I am small minded like him, I could dig dozens of his ridiculous posts now, but I have better things to do.
 
Yes he did score the win and proved his point. I still dislike advance gloating, I dislike it on principle. The final outcome doesn't make a difference. I dislike gloating as much as I dislike making a scene after a loss. They're both reprehensible attitudes in my book and I'll stick by this opinion.

Very well said.
 
vtmike is desperate for attention. Just shows a sad state of his shallow mind.

Anyway both of my quoted posts are still true and accurate. It is just hard for someone like vtmike to realize that.

If I am small minded like him, I could dig dozens of his ridiculous posts now, but I have better things to do.

The thread title says "A Collection of the Best Posts " & I really think those are the cream of the crop...
 
vtmike is desperate for attention. Just shows a sad state of his shallow mind.

Anyway both of my quoted posts are still true and accurate. It is just hard for someone like vtmike to realize that.

If I am small minded like him, I could dig dozens of his ridiculous posts now, but I have better things to do.

Doesn't seem like it from the way you infect this place.

You know what I hate Ver? People who get up on their high horse. Your holier than thou posts are more annoying than anything Fed has to say. You still are yet to convince me that it is wrong to say you have the game to win a tournament.
 
Doesn't seem like it from the way you infect this place.

You know what I hate Ver? People who get up on their high horse. Your holier than thou posts are more annoying than anything Fed has to say. You still are yet to convince me that it is wrong to say you have the game to win a tournament.

Agree!!!! +1
 
Doesn't seem like it from the way you infect this place.

You know what I hate Ver? People who get up on their high horse. Your holier than thou posts are more annoying than anything Fed has to say. You still are yet to convince me that it is wrong to say you have the game to win a tournament.

+2

veroniquem: easily the worst poster on this forum

i hate nadal-haterz:twisted:

stop hating on saint rafael please
 
"He's gonna get booed anyway when he doesn't win the tournament after saying he has the game to win it.
The only way he has the game to win it is if Nadal and Djoko get eliminated before the final. I'm not even sure if Murray shouldn't be added to the list even on clay.
His first goal should be to avoid lapses of concentration in the first rounds, then to try and finally beat 1 of the big 3. He hasn't shown that he could so far and that would be even more important than winning this particular event given his current situation."

-veroniquem









thanks for sharing your tennis wisdom with us.
 
Actually what Fed has to say is anything but gloating. It's straightforward honesty. That's why Fed is so refreshing to listen to rather than the same old boring drivel that Nadal has been brainwashed into spewing. When someone is so competitive and ferocious in competition it is completely out of character to say oh so and so is a great player and I "hope" I play well against him when you damn well know you're going to beat him. Fed would say it (or at least allude to it) - this is honesty. It does not necessarily mean it will happen, BUT it is his feelings! Saying what you feel is not gloating. Nadal on the other hand has been trained to pay wonderful compliments to opponents when it's obvious it's just a load of crap - this is lying.

Frankly to believe that any athlete who excessively praises the opponent both before and after the match, is just plain naive. It's being "nice" for the media; just done for the press and public. It's not real. This is why Federer is refreshing. He tells it like it is...to him.
 
Actually what Fed has to say is anything but gloating. It's straightforward honesty. That's why Fed is so refreshing to listen to rather than the same old boring drivel that Nadal has been brainwashed into spewing. When someone is so competitive and ferocious in competition it is completely out of character to say oh so and so is a great player and I "hope" I play well against him when you damn well know you're going to beat him. Fed would say it (or at least allude to it) - this is honesty. It does not necessarily mean it will happen, BUT it is his feelings! Saying what you feel is not gloating. Nadal on the other hand has been trained to pay wonderful compliments to opponents when it's obvious it's just a load of crap - this is lying.

Frankly to believe that any athlete who excessively praises the opponent both before and after the match, is just plain naive. It's being "nice" for the media; just done for the press and public. It's not real. This is why Federer is refreshing. He tells it like it is...to him.

EXACTLY!! and those are the points I have been trying to make for some time now...
 
EXACTLY!! and those are the points I have been trying to make for some time now...

come on vtmike...tt is not representative of the real world...

it's fairly obvious that nadal isn't the smartest guy out there...it shows in
his interviews...he is very good in many ways but intelligence is not one of strengths...it's plain to see in his game...he does what he does REALLY WELL-like a well-programmed robot...
 
come on vtmike...tt is not representative of the real world...

it's fairly obvious that nadal isn't the smartest guy out there...it shows in
his interviews...he is very good in many ways but intelligence is not one of strengths...it's plain to see in his game...he does what he does REALLY WELL-like a well-programmed robot...

Ok now don't resort to insults...I mean I am not a fan of his game but Nadal is a great fighter & you have to be blind not to like his intensity! and he is a VERY intelligent player ...You don't get to num 1 & win 6 Grand Slams without intelligence!
 
LOL! It doesnt matter if he wins. He probably still will anyway. The fact he has to go 3 sets with Andy freaking Roddick on CLAY already is sufficient to show what a washed up loser he is.

Lets face it. He should retire. He is simply making a fool of himself by continuing to play pro tennis these days.

I am glad I am not a Federer fan. Who would want to support a washed up loser.

Federer has become a total joke. Having to play a tiebreak vs freaking Roddick on clay. Time to retire before he humiliates himself any further, ROTFL!

Some more posts by this guy...honestly some are just disturbing! He comes across as a mental case this one...

But one thing is certain...

1230200504_84268109cb38fb802a79d28c889b8efe.jpg
 
Last edited:
Ok now don't resort to insults...I mean I am not a fan of his game but Nadal is a great fighter & you have to be blind not to like his intensity! and he is a VERY intelligent player ...You don't get to num 1 & win 6 Grand Slams without intelligence!

i guess we disagree...(i didnt mean it as an insult btw)--
to me, nadal has 1 (and only 1) plan which he executes perfectly...
...have you ever seen seen him alter his game depending on the circumstances?
 
"He's gonna get booed anyway when he doesn't win the tournament after saying he has the game to win it.
The only way he has the game to win it is if Nadal and Djoko get eliminated before the final. I'm not even sure if Murray shouldn't be added to the list even on clay.
His first goal should be to avoid lapses of concentration in the first rounds, then to try and finally beat 1 of the big 3. He hasn't shown that he could so far and that would be even more important than winning this particular event given his current situation."

-veroniquem









thanks for sharing your tennis wisdom with us.
You're welcome. I should have said "eliminated or drained after a mindboggling 4 hour marathon". That was hard to anticipate! I still think Federer would struggle against a fresh Nadal or Djoko on clay (especially if the clay is not super fast). About Murray, I think we've had our answers about his clay level at this point.
 
vtmike is yet again (yes yet again) starting flame wars. This is all he does around here. Attack, insult and follow anyone who is not Federer fan. and he calls other people "mental" :roll:
 
i'm not even gonna go there until this thread has a shelf-life of more than a few hours. the amount of house-cleaning that's been going on by the mods has been brutal. some classic nuggets have already bitten the internet dust. i guess the key is to catch those posts before the disappear into oblivion! but you gotta act fast around here!!
 
You're welcome. I should have said "eliminated or drained after a mindboggling 4 hour marathon". That was hard to anticipate! I still think Federer would struggle against a fresh Nadal or Djoko on clay (especially if the clay is not super fast). About Murray, I think we've had our answers about his clay level at this point.

you should be gracious in defeat

just admit your mega-fail

thankfully, nadal had a w.o. AND played his semi earlier than roger...

imagine what would've happened if the New King of Clay wasn't as tired...
 
vtmike is yet again (yes yet again) starting flame wars. This is all he does around here. Attack, insult and follow anyone who is not Federer fan. and he calls other people "mental" :roll:

are you talking to yourself again?

nobody asked "yet again???"
 
vtmike is yet again (yes yet again) starting flame wars. This is all he does around here. Attack, insult and follow anyone who is not Federer fan. and he calls other people "mental" :roll:

Who's the stalker yet again? :-P

Again the thread is titled "A collection of the Best Posts" & those posts are the best IMHO...btw do you agree with any of Thalivest's posts?

Yes yes...I know its difficult to live with yourself after being called out so many times for trolling & being a hypocrite...but let it go man!! Geez... :)
 
come on vtmike...tt is not representative of the real world...

it's fairly obvious that nadal isn't the smartest guy out there...it shows in
his interviews...he is very good in many ways but intelligence is not one of strengths...it's plain to see in his game...he does what he does REALLY WELL-like a well-programmed robot...

I don't see how you can conclude anything about Nadal's intelligence. He's a young guy, doesn't speak english that well. What he says to the media is what most other players in all sports say, whether intelligent or not. They give fake praise. THIS is exactly why Federer is refreshing he does not do this, he's not a clone. Those who think Nadal is humble or whatever for saying what he says are simply naive to believe it.
 
I don't see how you can conclude anything about Nadal's intelligence. He's a young guy, doesn't speak english that well. What he says to the media is what most other players in all sports say, whether intelligent or not. They give fake praise. THIS is exactly why Federer is refreshing he does not do this, he's not a clone. Those who think Nadal is humble or whatever for saying what he says are simply naive to believe it.

i don't know man...the way a pro plays his tennis tells me a lot about his intelligence...

jmac is intelligent, santoro is intelligent, federer is intelligent.......nadal is not
 
you should be gracious in defeat

just admit your mega-fail

thankfully, nadal had a w.o. AND played his semi earlier than roger...

imagine what would've happened if the New King of Clay wasn't as tired...
Actually thankfully for Fed: if Nadal hadn't had the walkover, he may have lost in the quarter or in the semi in a faster match and Fed would probably have lost the final against a fresh Djoko or at the very least have had a tougher final to play. So all in all I think things all worked out to Fed's advantage, which is a good thing for him as he needed that win to restore some confidence and remain competitive against the top players.
Federer is the new king of clay because he won Madrid? Really? Nadal has won 2 clay masters and a 500 this season. Fed will have to work a little bit more to become the king of clay: try 25+ clay titles, 4 RG titles, 5 Monte-Carlo, 5 Barcelona and 4 Rome titles and then he'll be ready for the prestigious coronation.
 
Last edited:
i don't know man...the way a pro plays his tennis tells me a lot about his intelligence...

jmac is intelligent, santoro is intelligent, federer is intelligent.......nadal is not

One could equally posit that Federer is not intelligent (yes some have called it stubbornness, but there's a fine line) for not making the changes to his game required to beat Nadal sooner. I think the kind of intelligence you infer from what a person says is different from the type of intelligence displayed on court.
 
vtmike is desperate for attention. Just shows a sad state of his shallow mind.

Anyway both of my quoted posts are still true and accurate. It is just hard for someone like vtmike to realize that.

If I am small minded like him, I could dig dozens of his ridiculous posts now, but I have better things to do.
You are no angel here by any means.When I was new I thought you just didnt like Roger but I was okay with you otherwise.You however have proven to be every bit of the troll you are called.Reading some of your posts after the match makes me feel sorry for the fact that I thought you were just another fan who did not like Fed but was good to discuss with on a general basis.And I'm sad it didnt turn out to be so.
 
EXACTLY!! and those are the points I have been trying to make for some time now...



Nice spin. So being respectful to other players is "lying" and yet saying things like I am getting closer on clay blah blah blah (which no unbiased viewer really believed) is telling the "honesty". Glad someone finally expressed that thought for you.
 
One could equally posit that Federer is not intelligent (yes some have called it stubbornness, but there's a fine line) for not making the changes to his game required to beat Nadal sooner. I think the kind of intelligence you infer from what a person says is different from the type of intelligence displayed on court.

actually, not at all...i don't know if you follow football (soccer if u r american:))___but in case u do, have you seen messi talk? he doesn't sound very smart...but what he does in the football field tells me he has an extremely high iq...
 
Actually what Fed has to say is anything but gloating. It's straightforward honesty. That's why Fed is so refreshing to listen to rather than the same old boring drivel that Nadal has been brainwashed into spewing. When someone is so competitive and ferocious in competition it is completely out of character to say oh so and so is a great player and I "hope" I play well against him when you damn well know you're going to beat him. Fed would say it (or at least allude to it) - this is honesty. It does not necessarily mean it will happen, BUT it is his feelings! Saying what you feel is not gloating. Nadal on the other hand has been trained to pay wonderful compliments to opponents when it's obvious it's just a load of crap - this is lying.

Frankly to believe that any athlete who excessively praises the opponent both before and after the match, is just plain naive. It's being "nice" for the media; just done for the press and public. It's not real. This is why Federer is refreshing. He tells it like it is...to him.
Perfect post and I totally agree with you.Out with the politically correct nonsense.:roll:
 
Nice spin. So being respectful to other players is "lying" and yet saying things like I am getting closer on clay blah blah blah (which no unbiased viewer really believed) is telling the "honesty". Glad someone finally expressed that thought for you.
Ho-hum..whatever :roll:
 
Back
Top