Okay so lets see if guys like Sampras, Federer, Borg and Laver etc. are all time greats. Edberg, Becker, Wilander, Courier, Agassi etc. are greats Give me a player who simply defines good for you. A few examples I guess would be nice. Like is good a slam winner? Or does good not have any slams? So just list 5 guys you think were just good nothing more nothing less. For me it is guys like Roddick Stitch Krajicek Mecir Chang I don't know those are 5 guys who are think were good tennis players but not greats. I feel good does not need a slam but guys who were multislam winners I think are more than good even if it is two because winning two takes a lot more work than one in my opinion. However what is your definition of a good player. I basically feel a good player is consistent top 10-20 player who could make a run at big events but won a lot of smaller events. How about all of you?