Krish872007
Talk Tennis Guru
I know surface debates have been raging on for years, but I just wondered what people's thoughts would be on introducing a completely new surface to the game. First into the club levels, then futures, challengers, etc and finally onto the pro circuit.
I remember a friend and I once played on a very strange concrete surface in Singapore. It had a bit of everything. It played fast at times and slow at other times. If we struck a hard serve or groundstroke, it would zip through with little bounce. Topspin FHs/BHs created some very high bouncing balls and slower, longer rallies. Smashes could sometimes be retrieved as they practically stopped on the surface. Drop shots, on the other hand, were virtually impossible to pick up. Good for kickserves, reasonably good for S&V (although we didn't try much of that). Offers opportunities for plenty of variety from point to point.
IMO it could be quite entertaining to see a pro match on this, but there are some very obvious flaws/drawbacks:
1. Movement is more restricted. Any excessive sliding could be very dangerous and could probably end some careers.
2. Falling on court? Not an option really, for similar reasons.
3. Same goes for excessive baseline grinding.
4. The ball bounces over your head and you look foolish.
So, my question is really this: what surface addition would you like to see (if any) and why? Or should everyone stick with the standard clay/grass/cement?
I remember a friend and I once played on a very strange concrete surface in Singapore. It had a bit of everything. It played fast at times and slow at other times. If we struck a hard serve or groundstroke, it would zip through with little bounce. Topspin FHs/BHs created some very high bouncing balls and slower, longer rallies. Smashes could sometimes be retrieved as they practically stopped on the surface. Drop shots, on the other hand, were virtually impossible to pick up. Good for kickserves, reasonably good for S&V (although we didn't try much of that). Offers opportunities for plenty of variety from point to point.
IMO it could be quite entertaining to see a pro match on this, but there are some very obvious flaws/drawbacks:
1. Movement is more restricted. Any excessive sliding could be very dangerous and could probably end some careers.
2. Falling on court? Not an option really, for similar reasons.
3. Same goes for excessive baseline grinding.
4. The ball bounces over your head and you look foolish.
So, my question is really this: what surface addition would you like to see (if any) and why? Or should everyone stick with the standard clay/grass/cement?